Bloody Marvel said: Put the 4* at 30 wins.Put the 15CP at 40 wins.Everybody happy.Do that. No, don't argue. Don't think about it. Do that.
wymtime said: Spudgutter said: Stax the Foyer said: Spudgutter said: My point overall isnt even the cost associated, but the fact that people are upset that they are "losing" cp, claiming it is the only resource that that they play this game for, while at the same time not going after all the cp they could get. This is a silly point, there are more factors at play here than raw CP earnings. People value both CP and time. The marginal CP difference between PvE CLs is coupled with a significant change in time requirement. Choosing to give up a few CP a week in exchange for hours of your time is a totally rational decision, and one that's completely consistent with complaining about possibly getting 45 fewer CP/week in PvP and having to spend more time to get the remainder of the rewards. A few? It's 7 across progression from a 3/4 day event, 10 if you drop down to scl7. Throw down some extra for the extra sub rewards, if there are any. 14 to 20 per week, plus all of the extra covers and tokens, which feed the farms, which gets you more cp....I'm not saying you cant make that rational decision, I'm just pointing out that if you say you want all the cp you can get, then make that decision, it's a little hypocritical It is called quality of life and can also be determined by if you have the 5* required leveled or not for PVE. A lot of 5* players play PVP because that is what we like and we strive for the CP. we play PVE for iso and progression CP. CL9 has a significant jump in levels compared to CL8. I personally strive for the cp in this game but usually go CL8 because the lower CP is worth the quality of life CL8 provides. This new PVP system significantly impacts my quality of life as far as the game goes and how much CP I can earn.most 5* players actually understand how beneficial this change will be for 3* and 4* players what we are asking saying is why is our quality of life being sacrificed for yours. Why can’t there be a system that benefits all?? You can argue with people on the forum and insist upon your points or you can actually look at it from other players perspectives and the support they have given the game. Just remember they way we are being treated now as in the future if you are around long enough it will be how d3 treads you.
Spudgutter said: Stax the Foyer said: Spudgutter said: My point overall isnt even the cost associated, but the fact that people are upset that they are "losing" cp, claiming it is the only resource that that they play this game for, while at the same time not going after all the cp they could get. This is a silly point, there are more factors at play here than raw CP earnings. People value both CP and time. The marginal CP difference between PvE CLs is coupled with a significant change in time requirement. Choosing to give up a few CP a week in exchange for hours of your time is a totally rational decision, and one that's completely consistent with complaining about possibly getting 45 fewer CP/week in PvP and having to spend more time to get the remainder of the rewards. A few? It's 7 across progression from a 3/4 day event, 10 if you drop down to scl7. Throw down some extra for the extra sub rewards, if there are any. 14 to 20 per week, plus all of the extra covers and tokens, which feed the farms, which gets you more cp....I'm not saying you cant make that rational decision, I'm just pointing out that if you say you want all the cp you can get, then make that decision, it's a little hypocritical
Stax the Foyer said: Spudgutter said: My point overall isnt even the cost associated, but the fact that people are upset that they are "losing" cp, claiming it is the only resource that that they play this game for, while at the same time not going after all the cp they could get. This is a silly point, there are more factors at play here than raw CP earnings. People value both CP and time. The marginal CP difference between PvE CLs is coupled with a significant change in time requirement. Choosing to give up a few CP a week in exchange for hours of your time is a totally rational decision, and one that's completely consistent with complaining about possibly getting 45 fewer CP/week in PvP and having to spend more time to get the remainder of the rewards.
Spudgutter said: My point overall isnt even the cost associated, but the fact that people are upset that they are "losing" cp, claiming it is the only resource that that they play this game for, while at the same time not going after all the cp they could get.
Daredevil217 said: We don't know that.
Vhailorx said:Astrp:You are right that we don't know as much about playet soending habits as demi. But i reject the idea that we can't or shouldn't speculate about dev for various moves. We should probably avoid saying things like: "the devs would just make more money if they did X." but what is wrong with saying "the devs have made X change, which they presumably think will raise their revenue in Y fashion, but i wonder if they have considered Z"?
Vhailorx said: Sometimes i just feel that negatives are out of proportion with the positives.
Vhailorx said: Dude awesome: true healing, oml nerf, baking "fix," and boss rush all got much more feedback (true healing was more than 100 pages) and the devs basically did nothing about any of those issues in the short term. Don't hold your breath.
Vhailorx said: Zeiram: what slice do you play? S2 is a wasteland where 1200 is both quite hard to get and much more likely to be a top 10 score. In s3-5 it's a fair bit easier to score well, but it's very rare to get even top 25 below 1200 unless the bracket flips inside the last 8 hours. And really tough brackets can push 1200 scores down into the 60s or 70s. I dont play s1 veey often, but i understabd it to be similar to s3-5.
Vhailorx said:I dont play s1 veey often, but i understabd it to be similar to s3-5.
OJSP said: D4Ni13 said: OJSP said: D4Ni13 said:I certainly don't try to defend them. You could've fooled me. I thought we need to stand behind the game just like we support our football team through the good and the bad? Maybe you should. Though taking comments out of context won't do you any good. I was refearing to people that quit over OML nerf, and has nothing to do with this conversation. But hey while we're at it, how is life going for you ? Do you have a button to stop it & complain that it isn't fair from once in a while ? The point is everybody here got used to have everything for granted, and when demi decided that they don't want to give that much CP anymore, you feel robbed. And you think complaining about it will solve the problem ? The decision is already made. You have 2 options: either move on and find new solutions, either quit. But if you really wanna come here and tell me how hard it is for you to be a top player, at least have the decency to explain yourself and the situation in a civilized manner, with solutions and no whiney complains. All you did here is a cheap fiasco about how unfair is life at the top. It's like a rich guy complains to a poor guy how awful it is to be rich.I can sympathize with you and also try to help you, if you use some logic & maturity in your reasons. I'm not saying that your game is easy or you aren't disadvantaged by this change, but don't treat me like you know everything there is to know just because you have a stronger roster than mine.I played since the beginning, like most of you probably, and I took different decisions apparently.And I'm happy with the state of my roster, progression & how I feel when playing the game, regardless of what is changing in gameplay. So that means I did take some right decisions at some point in time, and maybe I'm not completely desilusional when I make a stance here.You may think what you want from this stance and joke about it, but like I already said today, this game is a lot better than it was 4 years ago. There were good decisions and bad decisions, but this kind of behavior of rejecting everything new is not helping anybody. On top of the fact that we don't even have the official table of rewards yet.I believe you when you say that 5* play is messed up, but this is not the way to make a change. You need to post precise data in a good manner, without sarcasm and pointless blaiming and make a case of what is wrong and how to improve it. And believe me, if you do this I will stand behind you, just like I stand now behind the voice of reason. Did you quote me and just go on a general rant to all 5* players or did you just attack me personally? I've been always curteous to you, ever since you started posting again in the forum when Ghost Rider came out and you suggested Black Panther as a partner. I wasn't even complaining. Check my last few posts.. where did I complain?I was merely using your example as defending the game that you so care about, which is contradictory to what you said about you not defending the game. I understand you're excited, as can be seen by the number of new threads and posts in the last few days related to the new characters and changes in the game. Your posts have been full of praises to the developers and some are justified. But, lets just take a step back and think about what we're doing here.. we are debating about an online match-3 game and attacking each other because of differing opinions? That is the problem here.My life is good. I have nothing to complain about. I just get on with it. Thanks.
D4Ni13 said: OJSP said: D4Ni13 said:I certainly don't try to defend them. You could've fooled me. I thought we need to stand behind the game just like we support our football team through the good and the bad? Maybe you should. Though taking comments out of context won't do you any good. I was refearing to people that quit over OML nerf, and has nothing to do with this conversation. But hey while we're at it, how is life going for you ? Do you have a button to stop it & complain that it isn't fair from once in a while ? The point is everybody here got used to have everything for granted, and when demi decided that they don't want to give that much CP anymore, you feel robbed. And you think complaining about it will solve the problem ? The decision is already made. You have 2 options: either move on and find new solutions, either quit. But if you really wanna come here and tell me how hard it is for you to be a top player, at least have the decency to explain yourself and the situation in a civilized manner, with solutions and no whiney complains. All you did here is a cheap fiasco about how unfair is life at the top. It's like a rich guy complains to a poor guy how awful it is to be rich.I can sympathize with you and also try to help you, if you use some logic & maturity in your reasons. I'm not saying that your game is easy or you aren't disadvantaged by this change, but don't treat me like you know everything there is to know just because you have a stronger roster than mine.I played since the beginning, like most of you probably, and I took different decisions apparently.And I'm happy with the state of my roster, progression & how I feel when playing the game, regardless of what is changing in gameplay. So that means I did take some right decisions at some point in time, and maybe I'm not completely desilusional when I make a stance here.You may think what you want from this stance and joke about it, but like I already said today, this game is a lot better than it was 4 years ago. There were good decisions and bad decisions, but this kind of behavior of rejecting everything new is not helping anybody. On top of the fact that we don't even have the official table of rewards yet.I believe you when you say that 5* play is messed up, but this is not the way to make a change. You need to post precise data in a good manner, without sarcasm and pointless blaiming and make a case of what is wrong and how to improve it. And believe me, if you do this I will stand behind you, just like I stand now behind the voice of reason.
OJSP said: D4Ni13 said:I certainly don't try to defend them. You could've fooled me. I thought we need to stand behind the game just like we support our football team through the good and the bad?
D4Ni13 said:I certainly don't try to defend them.
smkspy said: The irony is that the new scl scaling for pve players was loved by highend vet 5 rosters and a blow to 4 star and under rosters. We were told "well, it's not fair for 5 star players before, and they made it right for us despite it being an inconvenience or detriment to you guys." That system wasn't perfect and still isn't.Now the shoe is on the other foot, the guys that complained about the complainers are now the complainers. It's not a perfect system, but as we were told, this evens out the playing field a bit. Not a perfect solution just like pve, but thems the breaks too.
ronin-san said: In any case, Brigby doesn't deserve the flak he got, but they should be ashamed for throwing him out amidst the wolves like this.