R192: Champion Rewards Updates
Comments
-
killahKlown said:
understood
this update favors lower rosters. no doubt about it. But were any of us hooting and hollering when the updates were favoring the bigger rosters?
I'm disappointed too that I didn't get all that I was expecting. But I'm also not naïve or arrogant enough to not realize that the feeder introductions used to heavily favor those of us with bigger rosters and the lower rosters ultimately were not receiving the equal rewards. The pendulum swings both ways, we just happen to be on the wrong side of it this time. So for everyone to be crying about NOT FAIR is silly and hypocritical.
No, this change favors demi/d3. Vets lose out on covers they would have had (under the old feeder system) and everyone loses out on CP/HP they will need to make up for the LT rewards that have been removed.The more different player factions fight against each other, the eaiser it is for demi to let this system stand as-is. Which is bad for everyone.8 -
Are there whales with 4 max champed 4* or at least 3 max champed 4* with half way champed 4*? The maximum number of shards that can be saved is 9999, so a whales with 4 or at least 3.5 champed 4* of the same character will probably down the server?0
-
This was confusing and needlessly disappointing (if they would have just spelled it out more clearly earlier). I think the key words were "TLDR, if you would have missed Shards towards a cover but *haven’t yet received that cover in full*, you’ll get those Shards."
In other words, since shards only pay off when completed, they were giving them retroactively so that anyone who were relying on those shards to get to the next cover, would have the full set. What that means, is that if you already have the next cover in the set, you don't need what the shards would have provided, you didn't miss out on anything, so you don't get that extra, and so on.0 -
Probably too big of a update and this was just phase one0
-
Man, I just read this, I open the Game, and I got like five 5s covers!
Now that I am starting to look at it though, I think I got waaaaaay less shards that I should have. For rescue I should have got 1500 shards and I just got 300 !!!
PS: Of course, I need just one more cover for Doom and I got the one color I already have at 5...0 -
Well a least there was a developer on Discord adding fuel to the fire.....comment went something like this...."So why is everyone complaining about what amounts to free stuff". Really don't think that's the way it should be handled lol
1 -
tupacboy said:Probably too big of a update and this was just phase one
1 -
chris0001 said:Well a least there was a developer on Discord adding fuel to the fire.....comment went something like this...."So why is everyone complaining about what amounts to free stuff". Really don't think that's the way it should be handled lol*Sigh* maybe they can also complain that we are just whiny, entitled millennials. That will go over really well!0
-
chris0001 said:Well a least there was a developer on Discord adding fuel to the fire.....comment went something like this...."So why is everyone complaining about what amounts to free stuff". Really don't think that's the way it should be handled lol1
-
I'm disappointed too that I didn't get all that I was expecting. But I'm also not naïve or arrogant enough to not realize that the feeder introductions used to heavily favor those of us with bigger rosters and the lower rosters ultimately were not receiving the equal rewards. The pendulum swings both ways, we just happen to be on the wrong side of it this time. So for everyone to be crying about NOT FAIR is silly and hypocritical.
9 -
My experience and examples:
Shards normally given out at 295 (100), 298 (150), and 300 (250)
Old Feeders:
<280: Nothing (Example: Spiderman IW[277] -> 0 anything Spiderman BIB)
>280, <=294: Nothing (Example: Shuri[285]-> 0 Okoye)
>294, <=297: 100 shards (Example: Medusa[297]->100 BB shards)
>297, <=299: 250 shards (Example: X-Force[298]->250 OML shards)
>300, <=314: Nothing (Example: Gamora[302] -> 0 Thanos anything)
New Feeders (Emma>Kitty, Cyclops>Cable, InvisWoman>Doom, Magik>Hela, Cho>Hulk, HB>Rescue, Thor>Storm, Iceman>Iceman, Rogue>Gambit, Nightcrawler>Archangel, ProfX>ProfX)
<280: Nothing (Example: Emma Frost[271]->0 Kitty rewards)
>280, <=294: 1 Cover (Example: Professor X[294]->1 cover, 0 shards)
>294, <=297: 1 Cover, no example
>297, <=299: 1 Cover, no example
>300, <=314: 1 Cover, 100 Shards (Example: Hulkbuster[302]->1 cover, 100 shards)
I find it most frustrating that my 298 X-Force is 150 shards closer to an OML cover than my 302 Hulkbuster is to a rescue cover
1 -
I find that comment weird. I interpret it as why are players arguing about what is considered free stuff. What's the context?0
-
Secondary characters aside Magik, Valkyrie and Nightcrawler were all made new PRIMARY rewards. But nothing came for them
3 -
@IceIX I have a level 306 Rogue, and only got a Gambit cover + 100 shards. What happens now with what would have been the level 300 cover I no longer get since I didn’t get any of those earned shards?
my 298 Vulture picked up the correct number of Parker shards.
It looks like what happened was that new feeder character shards were treated the same as existing feeder character conversions?
was this intended?
I also got 200 shards each for XFDP and XFW, but no other 4*s. What happened there? I would have expected to get a shard-value cover for Sabretooth off my lvl 241 Patch Wolverine, but got 0 shards.2 -
HoundofShadow said:I find that comment weird. I interpret it as why are players arguing about what is considered free stuff. What's the context?I read it as dev feeling defensive about player outrage over these retroactive rewards and asking "why are players upset when all of these retroactive rewards amount to 'free stuff.'"I am sure it sucks to take a lot of harsh criticism on line, but there are many many things wrong with that statement.0
-
Oh my what a mess. This is pretty bad for old rosters. We have been genuinely screwed with the feeders (I don't even care about the 3 to 4 rewards).
So with my 340 IMHB instead of 4 Rescue covers I get 1 and 300 shards? (and the correct amount should have been 1500, not even the retroactive compensation is right)
With my 358 Cyclops instead of 5 Cable covers I get 1 and 750 shards?
And it something similar for Storm and Iceman. Like SERIOUSLY??????3 -
I could see why they went this route, not wanting is to get the cp rewards and shards...except didn't they tell us that the losses were minimal and we'd never notice? And didn't they previously, k knowingly, let us double dip on LT's and the 5* covers?
They knew full well what they were doing all along. And their silence and super late announcement patterns followed by more silence only cements in my mind their intentions and understanding of the response they would receive.
3 -
There must be more batches of rewards coming at a later point. To use a fan favourite character, talos, as an example, I have a level 262 3* captain marvel, and in the listed rewards, there are ticks next to all the ‘received’ talos shards. However, if I look at Talos, he is sitting on zero shards currently. I should have at least received some, if it were all delivered in the same data push.
im sure there will still be some shards that slip the net, but there should definitely be some more coming1 -
For the record, I very much had a "wait and see" approach in regards to shards.
They're essentially colorless covers, a long-requested feature. I knew there were likely gonna be some tradeoffs.
When they were initially announced and implemented and some people immediately went negative, I was still waiting to see what the full picture would look like before weighing in.
I realize there will likely still be updates to PvE and PvP placement/progression rewards to include shards.
But if this update is any indication, just stop. Please stop the bleeding. Go back to bonus heroes. With each update, it seems better and better in hindsight and comparison. Give us back our CP/HP/ISO in champ rewards. Keep the Mighty Tokens though, those are OK.
How's the song go? "Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got till it's gone?"
Thanks for proving that true once again.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.4K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 510 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 426 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 301 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements