R192: Champion Rewards Updates

1…1314161819…27

Comments

  • Freelancer
    Freelancer Posts: 122 Tile Toppler
    Well, the table that outlined the new rewards per level didn't even end up being right...
  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards
    I rarely see devs replying at this timing. They are more likely to reply within the next 4 to 8 hours.
  • Vhailorx
    Vhailorx Posts: 6,085 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited December 2019
    killahKlown said:
    AlexNapalm said:
    HoundofShadow said:
    It's possible they might be doing batch update because their servers can't handle giving out that much rewards in one update.  B)
    Very much hope so. If that's what's up, I hope they come out and say it soon. Morale is currently not high. 
    Why are they being so silent?
    Well, I think the d3 comms team is US west coast.  So I wouldn't expect much from IceIX for at least a few more hours.  Maybe something from demi over on discord?  (Though that would surprisingly fast.)

    Hopefully they are in damage control mode because this is turning into a PR debacle.  That's the only way we will ever actually get any favorable change to this horrible update.
  • AXP_isme
    AXP_isme Posts: 809 Critical Contributor
    I’m just going to leave this here. Seems like people may have need of it:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/7zrz1b/pitchfork_emporium/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
  • pheregas
    pheregas Posts: 1,721 Chairperson of the Boards
    NokkonWud said:
    Not sure this was the way to handle the update. 

    My 4* Cyclops rewarded 1x 5* Cable and 100 shards for Cable. I would have had 500 shards via progression, so now I'm a cover down on Cable. This is just one example. 

    Why not pay the new currency out in whole to those who have played and supported the game as long as they have to be that far in progression rewards? So strange. 
    My 4* Cyc is max champ at 370 and I got 1 Cable Blue cover and 500 shards... 

    On the other hand...  My 4* Iceman is level 349 and I got a single Iceman Yellow cover and 650 shards.  650?  ****?
  • CathexisZero
    CathexisZero Posts: 13 Just Dropped In
    edited December 2019
     IceX stated that "TLDR, if you would have missed Shards towards a cover but *haven’t yet received that cover in full*, you’ll get those Shards. So if you would have been working towards a cover before and now you’re working toward Shards, you’ll have the Shards up till then to equal the cover."

    So I have a Level 359 Medusa.  I received no Black Bolt shards.  So when I hit 360, instead of getting a Black Bolt cover...I instead get 250 shards.    I thought that if we would have "missed" shards due to the updates, those shards would be retroactively awarded. 

    And this isn't the only retroactive or prospective hit my roster is taking due to this change.  

    I mean, SERIOUSLY?  Something went very, very, very wrong here.  
  • pheregas
    pheregas Posts: 1,721 Chairperson of the Boards
    I also got zero 4* covers.  and only 1,400 total shards between 9 4* characters despite the fact I have every single 3* max champed and duplicate champed versions for almost every single one of them.
  • killahKlown
    killahKlown Posts: 585 Critical Contributor
    edited December 2019
    NokkonWud said:
    For what it's worth, the original post was edited today at the bottom to say that we will be getting less shards than we would get through progression. So where you *should* have shards to buy covers, you will get about 20% of the amount you thought you'd get. Not sure why they opted for this, just seems inconsistent and unfair on people who have played the game longer.

    On the other hand, keeping it the old way is unfair to the lower rosters.  As they wouldn't benefit from the "double dipping" of getting LT rewards and the retroactively getting cover rewards for the same level once a new feeder is created.
  • DarthDeVo
    DarthDeVo Posts: 2,178 Chairperson of the Boards
    Good governor, this has to go down as the most needlessly confusing update in the history of the game. 

    Overall shard haul is waaaaayyyy lower than expected. I got some shards for some 5* characters, both new feeders and old, but no shards for other 5* characters? Why? Who knows? (Only the Shadow knows) 

    Got a few 4* shards, but not many. Same with 3* shards. 

    I'm becoming more and more convinced they made this as confusing and complicated as possible so no one really knows what they should or shouldn't be expecting for rewards. Makes it that much easier for mistakes to be missed. 
  • NokkonWud
    NokkonWud Posts: 15 Just Dropped In
    pheregas said:
    NokkonWud said:
    Not sure this was the way to handle the update. 

    My 4* Cyclops rewarded 1x 5* Cable and 100 shards for Cable. I would have had 500 shards via progression, so now I'm a cover down on Cable. This is just one example. 

    Why not pay the new currency out in whole to those who have played and supported the game as long as they have to be that far in progression rewards? So strange. 
    My 4* Cyc is max champ at 370 and I got 1 Cable Blue cover and 500 shards... 

    On the other hand...  My 4* Iceman is level 349 and I got a single Iceman Yellow cover and 650 shards.  650?  tinykitty?
    So you should have 2500 shards for Cable from progression, so around 20*. My Cyclops is 312, I should have 500, got 100. Again, 20%. 
  • shinnaruto
    shinnaruto Posts: 60 Match Maker
    i am trying to look over a few covers and noticed i am getting about half of what I should have.
    Example - 3* Torch - received all of the Thing shards, but none of 4* Torch shards

    I think there is a bug in this rollout.

    Ice - Could you please let us know if there is an issue with the update??
  • killahKlown
    killahKlown Posts: 585 Critical Contributor
    bluewolf said:
    killahKlown said:
    NokkonWud said:
    For what it's worth, the original post was edited today at the bottom to say that we will be getting less shards than we would get through progression. So where you *should* have shards to buy covers, you will get about 20% of the amount you thought you'd get. Not sure why they opted for this, just seems inconsistent and unfair on people who have played the game longer.

    On the other hand, keeping it the old way is unfair to the lower rosters.  As they wouldn't benefit from the "double dipping" of getting LT rewards and the retroactively getting cover rewards for the same level once a new feeder is created.
    Uh huh...so did the newer/lower rosters pay into the game for 4 years keeping it going?
    Oh right...updates should only be unfair towards the group that you are not in.  Got it.
  • fmftint
    fmftint Posts: 3,653 Chairperson of the Boards
    Don't worry about this loss of rewards,  they'll make it up in other places.  Yeah right LMFAO
  • dramatist
    dramatist Posts: 227 Tile Toppler
    In this current form this is an outrage. There is no reason to penalize people for having higher level rosters.



  • killahKlown
    killahKlown Posts: 585 Critical Contributor
    NokkonWud said:
    killahKlown said:
    NokkonWud said:
    For what it's worth, the original post was edited today at the bottom to say that we will be getting less shards than we would get through progression. So where you *should* have shards to buy covers, you will get about 20% of the amount you thought you'd get. Not sure why they opted for this, just seems inconsistent and unfair on people who have played the game longer.

    On the other hand, keeping it the old way is unfair to the lower rosters.  As they wouldn't benefit from the "double dipping" of getting LT rewards and the retroactively getting cover rewards for the same level once a new feeder is created.
    Whilst that is true, LT's are far from a guarantee of a 5* cover, which is one of the reasons for this change (to allow a fairer covering of 5*'s across the board, not just Latest Legends. 

    We didn't ask for the change, this was something decided and implemented, yet we lose out. The fair way to do this would be to make the changes (and the change is the shard resource) available for its placement in progression rewards for those who have supported the game (in playtime and expense) to keep it going. 

    Now we have lost out on a resource we can't get back because progression has passed. 

    understood

    this update favors lower rosters.  no doubt about it.  But were any of us hooting and hollering when the updates were favoring the bigger rosters? 


    I'm disappointed too that I didn't get all that I was expecting.  But I'm also not naïve or arrogant enough to not realize that the feeder introductions used to heavily favor those of us with bigger rosters and the lower rosters ultimately were not receiving the equal rewards.  The pendulum swings both ways, we just happen to be on the wrong side of it this time.  So for everyone to be crying about NOT FAIR is silly and hypocritical.

  • Waddles_Pines
    Waddles_Pines Posts: 1,245 Chairperson of the Boards
    DarthDeVo said:
    Good governor, this has to go down as the most needlessly confusing update in the history of the game. 

    Overall shard haul is waaaaayyyy lower than expected. I got some shards for some 5* characters, both new feeders and old, but no shards for other 5* characters? Why? Who knows? (Only the Shadow knows) 

    Got a few 4* shards, but not many. Same with 3* shards. 

    I'm becoming more and more convinced they made this as confusing and complicated as possible so no one really knows what they should or shouldn't be expecting for rewards. Makes it that much easier for mistakes to be missed. 
    ^^^ This.  They easily could have said, 2* rewards on Tues, 3* rewards on Wed, etc; instead of dumping everything all at once to the confusion of all...

Categories