HoundofShadow said: How is stating an opinion trolling? Is there a certain kind of opinion I must and can only have when you mentioned that Ice said Bishop will not be nerfed? Many will be disappointed and it's plausible that they will retire. My opinion was inferred based on players retiring due to Gritty being the meta.
BigSoftieFF said: HoundofShadow said: I suppose a lot of people are going to quit over this and more retirement topics in the coming days. Why do you care? Keep trollin the threads...You have to be a dev or D3 account or something,
HoundofShadow said: I suppose a lot of people are going to quit over this and more retirement topics in the coming days.
tiomono said: BigSoftieFF said: HoundofShadow said: I suppose a lot of people are going to quit over this and more retirement topics in the coming days. Why do you care? Keep trollin the threads...You have to be a dev or D3 account or something, So because a player doesn't complain about the devs all the time and often supports or defends their decisions or actions they are a troll and have to be a dev? The hatred for the dev team in this community is unreal. How so many people can nonstop spout how clueless/moneygrubbing etc etc the devs are yet still play the game and even spend money on it is mindboggling.
The rockett said: It is sad that this Dev team cannot spot a broken character that needs fixed. It is not surprising because it took so many months for them to fix Gambit even though everyone was telling them how broken he was.
BigSoftieFF said: tiomono said: BigSoftieFF said: HoundofShadow said: I suppose a lot of people are going to quit over this and more retirement topics in the coming days. Why do you care? Keep trollin the threads...You have to be a dev or D3 account or something, So because a player doesn't complain about the devs all the time and often supports or defends their decisions or actions they are a troll and have to be a dev? The hatred for the dev team in this community is unreal. How so many people can nonstop spout how clueless/moneygrubbing etc etc the devs are yet still play the game and even spend money on it is mindboggling. Wrong guy pal. I don’t hate the dev team or the game and understand and support many things they do. For example...I like supports, costumes, bundles, etc. Bishop is a joke plain and simple.What I don’t like is “players” who always argue in bad faith. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to catch the vibe that they put down..
tiomono said: BigSoftieFF said: tiomono said: BigSoftieFF said: HoundofShadow said: I suppose a lot of people are going to quit over this and more retirement topics in the coming days. Why do you care? Keep trollin the threads...You have to be a dev or D3 account or something, So because a player doesn't complain about the devs all the time and often supports or defends their decisions or actions they are a troll and have to be a dev? The hatred for the dev team in this community is unreal. How so many people can nonstop spout how clueless/moneygrubbing etc etc the devs are yet still play the game and even spend money on it is mindboggling. Wrong guy pal. I don’t hate the dev team or the game and understand and support many things they do. For example...I like supports, costumes, bundles, etc. Bishop is a joke plain and simple.What I don’t like is “players” who always argue in bad faith. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to catch the vibe that they put down.. Then ignore them or something. If they really are a troll and bother you, you can block yourself from seeing the posts they make. There is no need to pounce on other people and call them a dev that is just here to troll the forums.
Therealsmkspy said: When 4* Starload got a rebalance, he with someone else (remember) made an infinite win team. The devs corrected it in a day.I'll leave that here.
bluewolf said: Pulling the rug out on someone who's trying to finish Bishop is risky. For all the vets hanging around, there are probably an equal number of players who are trying to figure out how to make progress in the 4 tier and anyone serious about it is probably a spender too.
Borstock said: The rockett said: It is sad that this Dev team cannot spot a broken character that needs fixed. It is not surprising because it took so many months for them to fix Gambit even though everyone was telling them how broken he was. Who says they can't?It should once again be mentioned that the goals of the player and the goals of the devs are not the same thing. I pretty much always assume that a character is working as intended until patched. Even then, we can assume their intentions for the fix, but I doubt we can know for sure, even if an explanation is offered on the forums. A character that is "broken" for the players is not necessarily "broken" for a dev.
The rockett said: Borstock said: The rockett said: It is sad that this Dev team cannot spot a broken character that needs fixed. It is not surprising because it took so many months for them to fix Gambit even though everyone was telling them how broken he was. Who says they can't?It should once again be mentioned that the goals of the player and the goals of the devs are not the same thing. I pretty much always assume that a character is working as intended until patched. Even then, we can assume their intentions for the fix, but I doubt we can know for sure, even if an explanation is offered on the forums. A character that is "broken" for the players is not necessarily "broken" for a dev. While I understand what you are getting at and understand your point, if the Dev team thinks he is fine then they seriously do not understand the 5* game. And if that is the case, that is even more scarier then the current set up of Bishop.
grunth13 said: The rockett said: Borstock said: The rockett said: It is sad that this Dev team cannot spot a broken character that needs fixed. It is not surprising because it took so many months for them to fix Gambit even though everyone was telling them how broken he was. Who says they can't?It should once again be mentioned that the goals of the player and the goals of the devs are not the same thing. I pretty much always assume that a character is working as intended until patched. Even then, we can assume their intentions for the fix, but I doubt we can know for sure, even if an explanation is offered on the forums. A character that is "broken" for the players is not necessarily "broken" for a dev. While I understand what you are getting at and understand your point, if the Dev team thinks he is fine then they seriously do not understand the 5* game. And if that is the case, that is even more scarier then the current set up of Bishop. I think what he means is a match against bishop is going to cause you to use between 1 and 3 health packs which to the dev's means $. Remember, the reason Oml was nerfed was because "too many people were using him for too many matches" meaning he was causing the players to not have to use health packs.