Dayv said:And I'd be totally fine with this getting announced hand-in-hand with a far more needed and drastic redesign to Gambit at both the 3* and 5* tiers.
Dayv said: thedarkphoenix said: You'll also notice that 3 star gambit isn't really the topic of discussion like he was a few weeks ago...and that's because his damage isn't insane and his utility isn't near as good. I used a 3* Gambit team (along with 3* Storm) in a Daredevil Lightning Round today to take down a team with champed 5* Thanos and 5* Spidey (Peter Parker). None of my 3* champs were maxed out, and my Daredevil wasn't even as big as the enemy's. 3* Gambit is *also* a problem, not because of his damage output (although his purple is no slouch) but because of the constant AP feeding to his actives and the feeding from his red to random AP for the rest of the team.
thedarkphoenix said: You'll also notice that 3 star gambit isn't really the topic of discussion like he was a few weeks ago...and that's because his damage isn't insane and his utility isn't near as good.
entrailbucket said: I don't understand why the BP/Thanos combo seems to be getting so much attention here. Maybe because I play in a less populated slice I don't see it as much, but even pre-Gambit I hardly ever ran into them.
GrumpySmurf1002 said: entrailbucket said: I don't understand why the BP/Thanos combo seems to be getting so much attention here. Maybe because I play in a less populated slice I don't see it as much, but even pre-Gambit I hardly ever ran into them. This seems impossible. They were literally the meta from the moment Panther hit tokens until Gambit's release. And they're still the choice of anyone not running Gambit.
PenniesForEveryone said: GrumpySmurf1002 said: entrailbucket said: I don't understand why the BP/Thanos combo seems to be getting so much attention here. Maybe because I play in a less populated slice I don't see it as much, but even pre-Gambit I hardly ever ran into them. This seems impossible. They were literally the meta from the moment Panther hit tokens until Gambit's release. And they're still the choice of anyone not running Gambit. What do you think he will do to the meta 6 months from now if allowed to reign without a nerf until then???
therightwaye said: Is this the current tread for balance or Nerf talk?
therightwaye said: Sorry is this the official Nerf and or balance thread?
broll said: therightwaye said: Sorry is this the official Nerf and or balance thread? It's the thread for scruffy looking nerf herders.
PenniesForEveryone said: When fighting a level 506 Medusa, 540 Thor, and 450 Gambit........I take out Gambit first. That's pretty telling.
tiomono said: PenniesForEveryone said: When fighting a level 506 Medusa, 540 Thor, and 450 Gambit........I take out Gambit first. That's pretty telling. I would target a hood that was 100 levels weaker than one of his allies first as well. Any character that is that low level wise will have less health and makes a good priority.
Piro_plock said: tiomono said: PenniesForEveryone said: When fighting a level 506 Medusa, 540 Thor, and 450 Gambit........I take out Gambit first. That's pretty telling. I would target a hood that was 100 levels weaker than one of his allies first as well. Any character that is that low level wise will have less health and makes a good priority. Unless you're running Thanos that shouldn't always be the case. In my opinion better to take out the biggest threat first - it might be an AP stealer, a battery, someone with a dangerous/irritating passive or big nuke/AOE. Gotta save them healthpacks if possible.
tiomono said: So wanting to target gambit first proves he needs a nerf? Then there is a large portion of the character pool that also need nerfed.