Please nerf 5* Gambit
Comments
-
madoctor said:Milk Jugz said:To not admit Gambit is OP is being naive, I've beaten him about as much as I wipe to him (I'm probably less than 50/50 but I'll go with that thinking to make me feel better). I typically run my 463 DD with either 451 BB or 451 Thanos. I've taken down a 540 Parker/548 Miles team, but I struggle against 450-470 Gambits. I don't know what else needs to be said, HE IS OP!!!!
Not to mention in any match not including Gambit the offensive side has the clear upper hand.0 -
Does gambit red actually gains AP for charged tiles he destroys?
It seems so, but not sure yet1 -
GibbletsGrabber said:Does gambit red actually gains AP for charged tiles he destroys?
It seems so, but not sure yet1 -
Milk Jugz said:I've taken down a 540 Parker/548 Miles team, but I struggle against 450-470 Gambits. I don't know what else needs to be said, HE IS OP!!!!0
-
I was trying to get at this much earlier in this thread, but really anybody can beat anybody on offense; that's kind of an unspoken rule in MPQ. Very very early on, the developers tried to use players' win-rate on offense to determine how they were matched, and found very quickly that unless players were losing on purpose (which was another hilarious exploit that got fixed eventually), nobody ever really loses.
I'm not sure if it's the same at lower tiers, but for me the only way I lose a fight on offense is if something goes terribly wrong. I have to resort to tricks and stuff against much higher level teams, but I normally can't attack those guys anyway because the game hides them.
If anybody remembers boss rush, that event was widely disliked because players lost on offense, a lot. "Supposed to lose" became a rallying cry for certain folks on here. In a normal fight the AI is just so dumb that there's no chance you will lose unless he randomly gets a crazy cascade, or your forgot to heal your guys going in, or something else went wrong.
Gambit breaks this contract. Because of the nature of his design, the AI plays him exactly as a human player would, which makes him different than everyone else. You can't deny his powers, they're going off no matter what. He is a complete counter to any team that needs special tiles. He's guaranteed to do monster damage on red unless you can kill or stun him super fast. And now he also drains your AP, too. When people were saying that fighting him gave like a 95% win rate, that's *really bad*. I'd imagine most players' normal win rates on offense are pretty near 100%.
I'd be fine with more crazy defensive characters if that's the way they're headed, but Gambit is such an outlier that I can't believe he's on purpose.
9 -
Its mostly the same people in her saying the same thing over and over. Me included, I think gambit is no different than any other strong character before him in the bigger picture.
I do think he's crazy good, but I don't think he's unbeatable or OP, I've dealt with OP characters in plenty of other games and gambit doesn't come close to this.
Recently coming from 4 land to 5 land and having to deal with stupid carols and medusa and R&G that left your team on life support NO matter what you ran with NO chance of not taking heavy damage Gambit is just not that bad. I lost to those teams as much as i lose to gambit and I beat 5 star teams higher level with those teams much the same as a BB/gambit.
And even after that when trying to fight a blackbolt and having to try to kill him and match charge tiles I dont need to avoid a minimum of 5k damage at the start of each turn for free....yeah I can't really complain about gambit like that.
It sucks to get blown up quickly for a mistake or eventually just because the board isn't in your favor but that's been happening at every level of the game for awhile now unless you were already ahead of the curve.... Then maybe its something you didn't have to really experience recently.
If i can unsub this thread I will, because its actually getting sad now. 23 pages of going in circles trying to prove why a character is or isn't this or that.
Puzzle quest has never been balanced, its always been "have the best and better up the rest". You can rationalize it however you want, but strong teams and characters have dominated the game since its launch. And the only character that was almost unbeatable no matter if you boosted or not at one point was OML. And even then, if we had some of the characters we had now he would be fine.
4 land is still full of the same 4 or so best characters that>>>>>>>everything from almost 8 or 9 months ago.
But sure, gambit is killing the game, you all have never seen anything like this before. You can't compete at all because 5 games are just taking everything out of your pockets and mouths. You feel filthy for using 5 gambit, but you have too. LOL.1 -
bluewolf said:Milk Jugz said:I've taken down a 540 Parker/548 Miles team, but I struggle against 450-470 Gambits. I don't know what else needs to be said, HE IS OP!!!!0
-
Milk Jugz said:bluewolf said:Milk Jugz said:I've taken down a 540 Parker/548 Miles team, but I struggle against 450-470 Gambits. I don't know what else needs to be said, HE IS OP!!!!0
-
“Recently coming from 4 land to 5 land and having to deal with stupid carols and medusa and R&G that left your team on life support NO matter what you ran with NO chance of not taking heavy damage Gambit is just not that bad. I lost to those teams as much as i lose to gambit and I beat 5 star teams higher level with those teams much the same as a BB/gambit.“
this is why you don’t understand what the meta of this game has looked like since 5s were introduced. You’re a neophyte to 5* land and it’s cool you’ve seen OP toons in other games, but this is MPQ. The vets in this thread (top tier players of 3+ years) are telling you he’s broken, the devs have said they made him too strong, Your arguing against it because you’ve had 1 whole week of 5* mmr; that doesn’t lend itself to being an expert on what the real landscape of top pvp is.
Sometimes you just happen to fall on the wrong side of the coin. But espousing expertise of how the 5* game is when you’re just dipping your toe into the water (with the most OP toon) your argument loses a lot of its steam.3 -
LifeofAgony said:“Recently coming from 4 land to 5 land and having to deal with stupid carols and medusa and R&G that left your team on life support NO matter what you ran with NO chance of not taking heavy damage Gambit is just not that bad. I lost to those teams as much as i lose to gambit and I beat 5 star teams higher level with those teams much the same as a BB/gambit.“
this is why you don’t understand what the meta of this game has looked like since 5s were introduced. You’re a neophyte to 5* land and it’s cool you’ve seen OP toons in other games, but this is MPQ. The vets in this thread (top tier players of 3+ years) are telling you he’s broken, the devs have said they made him too strong, Your arguing against it because you’ve had 1 whole week of 5* mmr; that doesn’t lend itself to being an expert on what the real landscape of top pvp is.
Sometimes you just happen to fall on the wrong side of the coin. But espousing expertise of how the 5* game is when you’re just dipping your toe into the water (with the most OP toon) your argument loses a lot of its steam.
Top players on mpq= guys with best characters and the most time.
And one of my major points is that of course the "Top tier players" should all hate gambit. He levels the playing field a bit and not in there favor. Not only that he's super popular outside of being good. It sucks when you go from almost un challenge able to potentially beatable here and there.
I didn't even have a champed gambit until the end of last week I got 7 covers in the span of about 2 weeks. So I was fighting gambits with my lil 5 stars teams and no gambit like everyone else. And I felt the same way then as I do now.
0 -
thedarkphoenix said:If i can unsub this thread I will, because its actually getting sad now. 23 pages of going in circles trying to prove why a character is or isn't this or that.
Please do unsubscribe because you literally have no idea what you're talking about. What's sad is that there are 23 pages of long time players saying this toon is broken (and many other threads saying the same thing) and you can't wrap your brain around the possibility that he might, just might, not be good for the game. Most of the people complaining about hit him HAVE him.
But please, by all means, bring your baby Gambit to s5 and see how well you can compete there.
2 -
Sm0keyJ0e said:thedarkphoenix said:If i can unsub this thread I will, because its actually getting sad now. 23 pages of going in circles trying to prove why a character is or isn't this or that.
Please do unsubscribe because you literally have no idea what you're talking about. What's sad is that there are 23 pages of long time players saying this toon is broken (and many other threads saying the same thing) and you can't wrap your brain around the possibility that he might, just might, not be good for the game. Most of the people complaining about hit him HAVE him.
But please, by all means, bring your baby Gambit to s5 and see how well you can compete there.
3 -
Sm0keyJ0e said:thedarkphoenix said:If i can unsub this thread I will, because its actually getting sad now. 23 pages of going in circles trying to prove why a character is or isn't this or that.
Please do unsubscribe because you literally have no idea what you're talking about. What's sad is that there are 23 pages of long time players saying this toon is broken (and many other threads saying the same thing) and you can't wrap your brain around the possibility that he might, just might, not be good for the game. Most of the people complaining about hit him HAVE him.
But please, by all means, bring your baby Gambit to s5 and see how well you can compete there.
If you think this is about me having a gambit you are wrong, I JUST said I JUST got him leveled up and I think he's strong.
But you know since he's so OP I'd hate to take him to S5 and just dominate with him. *rolls eyes* Because you know that's what OP characters do.
Once someone can show or provide some actual facts or reasons WHY he is bad for the game the I have no problem agreeing or saying I'm wrong.
As of no its a bunch of people just saying he's bad for the game because he can make any team viable just about. And he's annoying to beat
Yeah that's not enough for me.
Sorry
0 -
thedarkphoenix said:Once someone can show or provide some actual facts or reasons WHY he is bad for the game the I have no problem agreeing or saying I'm wrong.
It's this type of comment that shows you're not paying attention. It has been stated COUNTLESS times over the course of numerous threads why he's bad for the game and what makes him broken. If you don't care to read and just want to comment willy-nilly then of course you're going to have people calling you out.0 -
thedarkphoenix said:LifeofAgony said:“Recently coming from 4 land to 5 land and having to deal with stupid carols and medusa and R&G that left your team on life support NO matter what you ran with NO chance of not taking heavy damage Gambit is just not that bad. I lost to those teams as much as i lose to gambit and I beat 5 star teams higher level with those teams much the same as a BB/gambit.“
this is why you don’t understand what the meta of this game has looked like since 5s were introduced. You’re a neophyte to 5* land and it’s cool you’ve seen OP toons in other games, but this is MPQ. The vets in this thread (top tier players of 3+ years) are telling you he’s broken, the devs have said they made him too strong, Your arguing against it because you’ve had 1 whole week of 5* mmr; that doesn’t lend itself to being an expert on what the real landscape of top pvp is.
Sometimes you just happen to fall on the wrong side of the coin. But espousing expertise of how the 5* game is when you’re just dipping your toe into the water (with the most OP toon) your argument loses a lot of its steam.9 -
The changes to Gambit have certainly slowed him down in my opinion. He is still more than handy tho and the Ap drain seems like an unnecessary add. I’m happy its there as I have a champed Gambit but in terms of balancing the toon I think it would have been better to not add this and you would have been close to a fix. What the end fix should be I don’t know but he is definitely slower now.
Pair him with Arch Angel and if the opposite team has more than 3 AP after 5 goes in any colour then they’ve had a god cascade which you can do nothing about.
0 -
People still having problem beating Gambit after change? I can understand if you are talking about bolt/gambit pair, but gambit by himself is so slow I doubt he his going to be able to get full damage on his red before you match the first charge tiles away. The +2 drain probably was unnecessary, but win rate should be closer to 90% now. Change it +1 drain or no drain he is fine. Use Panthos if you don't know how to fight AP drain...when gambit about to fire red the second time with charge tiles move panther to front.0
-
PenniesForEveryone said:thedarkphoenix said:LifeofAgony said:“Recently coming from 4 land to 5 land and having to deal with stupid carols and medusa and R&G that left your team on life support NO matter what you ran with NO chance of not taking heavy damage Gambit is just not that bad. I lost to those teams as much as i lose to gambit and I beat 5 star teams higher level with those teams much the same as a BB/gambit.“
this is why you don’t understand what the meta of this game has looked like since 5s were introduced. You’re a neophyte to 5* land and it’s cool you’ve seen OP toons in other games, but this is MPQ. The vets in this thread (top tier players of 3+ years) are telling you he’s broken, the devs have said they made him too strong, Your arguing against it because you’ve had 1 whole week of 5* mmr; that doesn’t lend itself to being an expert on what the real landscape of top pvp is.
Sometimes you just happen to fall on the wrong side of the coin. But espousing expertise of how the 5* game is when you’re just dipping your toe into the water (with the most OP toon) your argument loses a lot of its steam.
I could never make that transition now. Anyone attempting to transition into 5* PvP with anyone other than Gambit, or worse yet anyone already in the 5* realm with mid-lower tier 5s, is royally screwed. The recent "nerf" has made him even harder to fight with non-optimal teams.
Players shouldn't be locked out of 50% of end-game content because they lack 1 specific 5* out of 21 in the game. Players who have that character shouldn't be locked out of using the rest of their roster.
14 -
Gambit is head and shoulders more powerful than any other 5*. There is no team you can bring to fight a Gambit team to get a win chance that is even close to any other pairing, and on offense Gambit works better than any other pairing. This means one of two things:
- Gambit is OP
- The devs intend to introduce more characters at his power level and Gambit represents a new peak power level.
At this time, we have two data points against the second - Thor and Archangel aren't even close to Gambit's power level. They are much more in line with previously released 5*s, I would argue that Archangel is actually low tier. I will now go into why either of these two things are bad for the game:
- If Gambit is OP and the devs do not intend to bring him in line with the other 5*s, then essentially the game is pretty much doomed once he leaves Latest. At that point there will be no clear path to enter the "real" 5* tier (which is owning Gambit,) and any players who don't already have a Gambit (or at least 3/4 of one, depending on how long it takes them to link to a 4*,) will always be prey for a Gambit team. It doesn't matter what they run - Gambit and pretty much any other 5* will steamroll their team into the ground. They will have a much harder time climbing in PVP as they will pretty much have to skip every Gambit team. It will be like hitting a wall. It's hard enough to get into the 5* tier, but to add this layer of difficulty will actively kill the game. It will probably take months, but at that point the game will definitely be unsustainable.
- If they intend to introduce other broken 5*s, then the scenario will be similar to the above, but probably last longer as it won't turn off transitioners completely. 5* players will definitely get tired chasing the new hotness, and the new characters will very quickly eliminate the usefulness of the old 5*s altogether, which is very demoralizing. Nothing makes a player want to stop playing more than being basically unable to use most of the characters they spent a long time getting.
Look, my Gambit is at 12 covers, so it's simply a matter of time before I finish him, I'm not saying this because I'm stuck in the "have not" category. I just want the effectiveness of my 10 other 5*s back...
17 -
GrimSkald said:
Look, my Gambit is at 12 covers, so it's simply a matter of time before I finish him, I'm not saying this because I'm stuck in the "have not" category. I just want the effectiveness of my 10 other 5*s back...
I started using Gambit in place of my higher 5*s from when he was 5/3/3... Level 420. He was a bigger deterrent on defense than my 464 surfer.
Gambit is 451 now. He stinks.7
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 300 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements