bluewolf said:The devs have hinted that it will be clear later what they are doing. I dunno.
Blackstone said: So much complaining........It's their game and they can do whatever they want.
JHawkInc said:It is just a game, the people who are disappointed are voicing their opinion because they would like it to remain a game, instead of disappearing into the ether.No one benefits from you telling people to not voice their opinions, so why do it?
Blackstone said: Yes, I agree there are better ways they could have done some things, but I don't understand this apparent need to whine about things. If your criticism is constructive then, by all means, give it and move on.
Dragon_Nexus said: Blackstone said: So much complaining........It's their game and they can do whatever they want. And no-one's arguing that.You could go to your local supermarket and find they stock nothing but gravy cubes now. They can do what they want!You gonna shop there any more? Probably not.We're complaining because this situation isn't good. We're voicing our opinions so they know why this isn't good. If this whole thing doesn't bother you then that's fine, but coming into the topic to complain that we're complaining is kinda hypocritical, especially since you're not being constructive at all. Plenty of people in this thread are, however.
JHawkInc said: Blackstone said: So much complaining........It's their game and they can do whatever they want. Actually, they can't just do whatever they want. These actions are not performed in a vacuum. If they make bad decisions and people stop spending, they stop being profitable, Marvel cancels the license, and then it won't be their game anymore, and we won't have a game to play.It is just a game, the people who are disappointed are voicing their opinion because they would like it to remain a game, instead of disappearing into the ether.No one benefits from you telling people to not voice their opinions, so why do it?
bbigler said: Are there any whales on this forum? You know, people who spend $100 - $500 a week on this game?
DAZ0273 said: I could be wrong but also pretty much none of these guys are 5* feeders, right? Vulture? Maybe I'm getting cynical but you would have thought that would have been an extra incentive for hundreds of $. Or maybe not.
smkspy said: I'll just take my slow 4 star farm and 3 star dupe farm progression since I'm a 5 star player now.Don't need expensive monthly turbo boosts to spend along roster development just for champ levels and lousy 3 star supports.This is the very definition of predatory sales tactics to me. For the record, not against these bundles, but the implementation is just evil.
Yepyep said: smkspy said: I'll just take my slow 4 star farm and 3 star dupe farm progression since I'm a 5 star player now.Don't need expensive monthly turbo boosts to spend along roster development just for champ levels and lousy 3 star supports.This is the very definition of predatory sales tactics to me. For the record, not against these bundles, but the implementation is just evil. Actually, this is like part of the motivation for why they're doing it -- why they're looking for new revenue sources. Players like yourself, some/many of whom were once whales (though not necessarily you, @smkspy), no longer have any real incentive to spend on the game. Post-ISO, post-HP, etc. with only new 5*s really left to chase. Even the marginal advantage of increasing 5* champ levels isn't great enough really to matter much...