Updated 7 Day PVE Event Rewards

1…91011121315»

Comments

  • Bowgentle
    Bowgentle Posts: 7,926 Chairperson of the Boards

    Actually I have no idea since they had the glorious idea to send these out during S2 PVE.

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards

    150 Riri and 500 Deathlok for both my accounts.

  • Bowgentle
    Bowgentle Posts: 7,926 Chairperson of the Boards

    Ok that makes absolutely no sense, but ok.

  • KGB
    KGB Posts: 3,236 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited March 2023

    I think those 10 boss tokens were for the Boss event having to restart due to the side node issues. The rest were for the EOTS issues.

    Sweet bonus rewards for anyone who finished them both and got progression rewards already. I got the same as Hound did for finishing progression in both events.

    KGB

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards

    It's probably based on certain placements. I got top 500 or better placements.

  • Bowgentle
    Bowgentle Posts: 7,926 Chairperson of the Boards

    It still makes no sense since placement would include ISO and HP.

  • Wilger
    Wilger Posts: 96 Match Maker

    @HoundofShadow said:
    150 Riri Shards
    500 Deathlok Shards
    3* Dr Doom cover x 1
    Might tokens x 4
    Heroic tokens x 6
    Boss tokens x 10

    Thanks for the summation those tokens got lost in the Hoard"pile" was looking for what we got

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards

    Wait for the dev to chime in.

  • Bad
    Bad Posts: 3,146 Chairperson of the Boards

    Well, scl10 gave 500 wong shards in total and I was t50 so doble 75 riri shards plus 150 compensation 300 riri shards.
    Not a bad event, after all.

  • Bowgentle
    Bowgentle Posts: 7,926 Chairperson of the Boards

    I wish they'd based that on individual placement but I guess everyone got the same.

  • entrailbucket
    entrailbucket Posts: 5,821 Chairperson of the Boards

    @Bowgentle said:
    I wish they'd based that on individual placement but I guess everyone got the same.

    I imagine the issues caused some players to get lower placement than they normally would, so providing more compensation to players who finished higher (and thus, presumably weren't as affected by the issues) would just be compounding the problem.

  • meteor0905
    meteor0905 Posts: 62 Match Maker

    T10 and got the same

    @Bowgentle said:
    I wish they'd based that on individual placement but I guess everyone got the same.

  • Scofie
    Scofie GLOBAL_MODERATORS Posts: 1,365 Chairperson of the Boards

    I think it was the fairest and easiest way forward.

    Thanks for the compensation - it was very reasonable.

Categories