R192: Champion Rewards Updates
Comments
-
OJSP said:Ah.. analogies.. when a discussion starts to include analogies, then the discussion becomes about the analogies..1
-
OJSP's Anology theorum is a much lower stakes variation on Godwin's Law it seems lol1
-
DAZ0273 said:
everyone is complaining about what we're "losing", ignoring that we are actually getting something different and more targeted. HP Loss to me is the strangest complaint for someone in the end game.
0 -
Omegased said:DAZ0273 said:
everyone is complaining about what we're "losing", ignoring that we are actually getting something different and more targeted. HP Loss to me is the strangest complaint for someone in the end game.3 -
Omegased said:DAZ0273 said:
everyone is complaining about what we're "losing", ignoring that we are actually getting something different and more targeted. HP Loss to me is the strangest complaint for someone in the end game.If Demi takes away 50cp from me, but gives me 3x 5* wasp covers, allowing me to champ her, should I be happy? 3*x 5*s is more than I could ever get from 2 LT pulls these days.
Sure, now I have 3/13 more *CALL THE SWARM* but I don't think my overall mpq experience is much better.I can spend cp on any cover store I want, allowing me to target a set of 3x 5*s of my choosing. fixed 5* rewards vary wildly in value from character to character. So for players witu the goal of trying to cover and champ specific characters of their choosing (be that because they are good characters of fan favorites or whatever), it's not at all clear that the new system is better.Is this example an absurd reduction of the principle? It sure is. Does that mean that I am wrong and what we are getting is clearly better than what is being taken away? I don't think so. . .
2 -
There's ten pages of complaints here, then multiple new threads complaining about this implementation which - if we're truly honest - will benefit more people than it would harm.
I've been playing for over 4 years, i have 7 1/2 5stars max covered and champed. I have all but 8 4s champed. i have spend significant time and money in this game (wouldn't call myself a whale by any means). I truly enjoy this game, and the new changes and challenges/rewards they bring excite me.
This type of anger and annoyance is exhausting. Good luck with it all, and i hope you enjoy playing the game you hate.
9 -
Omegased said:There's ten pages of complaints here, then multiple new threads complaining about this implementation which - if we're truly honest - will benefit more people than it would harm.
I've been playing for over 4 years, i have 7 1/2 5stars max covered and champed. I have all but 8 4s champed. i have spend significant time and money in this game (wouldn't call myself a whale by any means). I truly enjoy this game, and the new changes and challenges/rewards they bring excite me.
This type of anger and annoyance is exhausting. Good luck with it all, and i hope you enjoy playing the game you hate.9 -
So is this live yet? I have a bunch of maxed 2s that I’m waiting to sell0
-
Omegased said:There's ten pages of complaints here, then multiple new threads complaining about this implementation which - if we're truly honest - will benefit more people than it would harm.
I've been playing for over 4 years, i have 7 1/2 5stars max covered and champed. I have all but 8 4s champed. i have spend significant time and money in this game (wouldn't call myself a whale by any means). I truly enjoy this game, and the new changes and challenges/rewards they bring excite me.
This type of anger and annoyance is exhausting. Good luck with it all, and i hope you enjoy playing the game you hate.
Most of us love the that feeders have been added in a big way. Most of us dislike that resources have been reduced. For a few of us, loss of resources is inconsequential. For one of us, loss of resources is welcomed with loving arms.16 -
blankcanvas said:People, people, people...
Can we get back on topic please?
I believe we were talking about Bishop being nerfed 😜👍3 -
shap328 said:So is this live yet? I have a bunch of maxed 2s that I’m waiting to sell0
-
Falconfreak said:shap328 said:So is this live yet? I have a bunch of maxed 2s that I’m waiting to sell10
-
Omegased said:<Snip> which - if we're truly honest - will benefit more people than it would harm. <Snip>If you can say this without making a substantive argument then those who disagree with you can say "this change is bad for a majority of players' too.
And to paraphrase:This type of [blind support for every move demi makes] is exhausting. Good luck with it all, and i [sometimes wish I could enjoy being abused by a game I otherwise enjoy as much as you.]See what I did there?
3 -
IceIX said:Falconfreak said:shap328 said:So is this live yet? I have a bunch of maxed 2s that I’m waiting to sell1
-
blankcanvas said:People, people, people...
Can we get back on topic please?
I believe we were talking about Bishop being nerfed 😜👍2 -
This is rad. The cuts don't seem too huge, and the changes (including Emma > Kitty) will let me champ three 5s I have sitting at 5/5/2, without having to level their feeder up to 320.
Bonus shards for secondary characters, at the cost of a few ISO, is also great.1 -
Just for fun, I’d like to point out that the loss of CP (and HP if people were previously using it to pull tokens) will further slow the rate of building up shards for targeted characters. There will be fewer pulls providing the targeted shards for characters that each player wants.I’m not sure that earning some random character specific shards at all makes up for that.5
-
Omegased said:There's ten pages of complaints here, then multiple new threads complaining about this implementation which - if we're truly honest - will benefit more people than it would harm.
I've been playing for over 4 years, i have 7 1/2 5stars max covered and champed. I have all but 8 4s champed. i have spend significant time and money in this game (wouldn't call myself a whale by any means). I truly enjoy this game, and the new changes and challenges/rewards they bring excite me.
This type of anger and annoyance is exhausting. Good luck with it all, and i hope you enjoy playing the game you hate.
There are eleven pages of mixed opinions in this thread. There have been positive, negative, enquiries and humour in those 11 pages. There are clearly not 10, let alone 11 pages of pure "complaints" lead posts so your claim is slightly misleading to anybody just reading it on its own.
Fact check
There is one negative thread (that I can see) on the front page of the General forum and the first 2 responses challenged the negative OP. By all means, fact check for yourself. If there are "multiple new threads" then possibly they are in other forums?11 -
IceIX said:Falconfreak said:shap328 said:So is this live yet? I have a bunch of maxed 2s that I’m waiting to sellIs the additional info on retroactive rewards still coming today?4
-
DAC169 said:IceIX said:BagPuss said:The lord giveth and the lord taketh away, Looks like eye candy.
Amount of CP gained has reduced, number of LTs reduced.
Amount of HP reduced, so those few PvP players left will have to start spending more on HP.
Why couldn't the shards compliment current rewards?
For the newer players it "seems" to open up opportunities, until you realise it's a 6 year old game and the entry point into the game should have been lowered (i.e every 1*, 2* already provided for you)... But this is a mobile game and related P2P dynamics
So in aggregate when you look at a 4-Star going from 270-370, yes. You lose out on some HP/CP. But in actual gameplay, that raise in levels comes over such a time that the HP loss is not really noticeable, since you're gaining so much more HP from elsewhere in that same amount of time. In the mean time, you're gaining further tokens at the comparable level than before, and flexibility in Shards versus covers with color choice and gaining Shards from multiple sources.
More importantly, you guys could have easily reworked the ISO-8, HP, & CP values to total the same in the end and still fit the shards in as you see fit. This makes it seem more like you're taking away from us.
As mentioned retooling so the total iso and HP remained the same and then adding shards wouldn't have been difficult. Or instead of splitting shards so that you get enough for 1 cover over 3 slots just give us the 1 cover. You literally replace 1 cover with less than 1 cover worth of shards and take up away. That is a direct loss of resources for no good reason.
I see most people are responding positively and that's great but I have to say I have a pit and a sinking feeling that this is not actually going to be an improvement for my gameplay and I'm worried that these changes aren't leading us in the right direction. If in the end I am forced to spend more money to get HP because of shortfalls I'm probably just going to be priced out and have to quit.
I literally just champed 5 star wasp because I was short HP and spares covers meant I'd get some to open a cover I wanted and this could have meant I didn't get that cover that day.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.4K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 510 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 426 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 301 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements