Meander said: tiomono said So I'm copping out, and whiny? 70% of the replies in this topic have been whiny. I was not whining but expressing my happiness over a change. Let me be happy. Yes. Using your wife and kids as an excuse is a cop out. "I don't want to play the shield hop game/ use line/ pay for more hp for shields" are all valid in game reasons to like this system. "My wife and kids don't let me play, compared to all you nerds" is not
tiomono said So I'm copping out, and whiny? 70% of the replies in this topic have been whiny. I was not whining but expressing my happiness over a change. Let me be happy.
Dragon_Nexus said: I'm going to throw my hat in the ring as a guy FOR the win based system.There are things wrong with it, sure, the total wins are out of whack...and it would be nice if there weren't as many gaps between prizes. But overall I enjoy myself more with that. I choose matches based on whether I think I can win rather than "Well this is the only fight worth more than 30 points and it's going to be a long painful slog that'll probably cost me 3 health packs assuming I even win..."I enjoyed the wins a lot more. It's more relaxed, more carefree and I can do it as I please for however long I please rather than at set finish times.It can be tweaked later, I'm sure, if they find people still aren't keen on 40 wins. But even if not...eh, it's still better than the old system for me =/
Vhailorx said: Dragon_Nexus said: I'm going to throw my hat in the ring as a guy FOR the win based system.There are things wrong with it, sure, the total wins are out of whack...and it would be nice if there weren't as many gaps between prizes. But overall I enjoy myself more with that. I choose matches based on whether I think I can win rather than "Well this is the only fight worth more than 30 points and it's going to be a long painful slog that'll probably cost me 3 health packs assuming I even win..."I enjoyed the wins a lot more. It's more relaxed, more carefree and I can do it as I please for however long I please rather than at set finish times.It can be tweaked later, I'm sure, if they find people still aren't keen on 40 wins. But even if not...eh, it's still better than the old system for me =/ Would you still feel that way if the changed also significantly reduced your acquisition rate for the resource in the game that offers meaningful roster progression? Because that is what locking the cp in placement does to 5* transitioners.Also, it's silly to suggest that this change lets you play whenever you want. That's only true if you only care about progression; placement still works on the same schedule. And if you really only care,about progression then PVP was already "play whenever you want" unless you got into shield hopping. And no one who shield hops a lot likes this change because they have to play 2x the matches AND finish top 10 to get the same rewards.I would guess that at least half of the opposition to this stupid change would go away if demi just put 15 cp at 40 wins. More grinding sucks, but it's much better than hard capping the number of players who can get rewards that used to be, at least theoretically, open to all.It is especially annoying given that something like clearance level should offer an easy solution to this problem. Put cp back in progression for cl8 and 9. That will incentivize play at the highest levels without opening the floodgates on cp flow to nee players.
Meander said: tiomono said So I'm copping out, and whiny? 70% of the replies in this topic have been whiny. I was not whining but expressing my happiness over a change. Let me be happy. Yes. Using your wife and kids as an excuse is a cop out.
SnowcaTT said: Wow. No SCL9 PVP announced with this huh?Nice knowing all the mid-level PVP'ers. See you in PVE, I guess.Gating off progression - which IS cp at this point - to T10 only is just terrible.-signed, T10 PVP player every event for many seasons.
Jarvind said: Meander said: tiomono said So I'm copping out, and whiny? 70% of the replies in this topic have been whiny. I was not whining but expressing my happiness over a change. Let me be happy. Yes. Using your wife and kids as an excuse is a cop out. Holy smokes, dude. Did you like, read that after you typed it? That's some serious addict mentality.
shardwick said: SnowcaTT said: Wow. No SCL9 PVP announced with this huh?Nice knowing all the mid-level PVP'ers. See you in PVE, I guess.Gating off progression - which IS cp at this point - to T10 only is just terrible.-signed, T10 PVP player every event for many seasons. Why do you need CL9? With so many threatening to quit the game you should have little competition at the top in 8 now.
scottee said: I'd just like to point out that this forum and this thread are both highly skewed with more high end, competitive players. That everyone has different experiences, and that some will like changes and some won't, should be obvious. This isn't a change that has an absolute better or worse.