Tony Foot wrote: Love the feature, absolutely hate that all the characters aren't in there. Put them all back in and let us choose a bonus. Yes RNG can be a pain but it's also been nice bringing along all my 4*s to get to the point where they can complete Crash. Ice is one of my least covered 4* now I have to set him and him alone as my bonus 4* as he's just too top tier to miss out on.Put them all back in and let us disregard those we don't want because half your new ones I neither want or will ever put ISO into past DDQ level to pass.
GrumpySmurf1002 wrote: Definitely didn't see this coming. This looks like a decent aid for 3/4* characters, but I don't think this helps getting 5s much. I'd have liked to see a 10% bonus rather than 5%. Good on the devs though for trying something though. Hopefully we'll see improvements on the system as data comes in. Having 1/2 the 3* removed from tokens seems like an unnecessary addition, however.
herm1978 wrote: This would be good if we could chose color when we get the bonus cover. I doubt that I'll select any 4* that I already have maxed two of the colors. That is just begging to get the wrong ones when I get the bonus cover.
tgibbs40 wrote: I also realize some of them are very powerful. That doesn't matter to me. Give me terribly designed 3* Spider Man over them any day. At least its Spider Man, a character I've enjoyed for years. Not some "promo" character forced on me.
whycantwesyncpc wrote: What about those of us that don't have any well covered 4*'s? It's pure tinykitty that I am going to get punished for not being far along in my roster progression. Can't add champ levels to more than half my 3* characters and can't cover most of the 4*'s. So I now have to add every excluded character to my favorites and dilute a 5% change greatly. So stupid. This should be optional. Huge disservice to those of us that need the stuff being rotated out.
Jaedenkaal wrote: smkspy wrote: Add to that, by favoring characters like starlord or X23 that both sit at 5-1-5, I'm just wasting a chance to add covers to much lower characters that I have 4 or less covers in their powers. In fairness, that's neither better or worse than the previous system. Actually it's probably a little better because you can decide to never see a star-lord or X-23 cover. If you do want to see them, you can (if you want) see them with higher odds than you could yesterday. The chance of getting the colour you want is still only 1/3.
smkspy wrote: Add to that, by favoring characters like starlord or X23 that both sit at 5-1-5, I'm just wasting a chance to add covers to much lower characters that I have 4 or less covers in their powers.
Jaedenkaal wrote: Look on the bright side. You'll never have to see another (randomly-generated) Elektra, Reed, or Brock Venom cover ever again, if you don't want to.
MidniteRider7462 wrote: xidragonxi wrote: GrumpySmurf1002 wrote: Now, one can argue which is better, but the end goal here sure seems like they're trying to flatten out the availability of the tier to create more interest in the newer heroes. That's not a terrible goal honestly, since a big gripe is how irrelevant new releases are currently. There was an easy solution to this: Put the latest 12 (or whatever the number is) 4* characters in LATEST LEGENDS tokens, and the older 20-30 4* characters in CLASSIC LEGENDS tokens. Problem solved. Fewer people annoyed. Want the shiny new character? Pony up an extra 5 CP. Want an older one? You got it. ^^ 100% THIS ^^!!!
xidragonxi wrote: GrumpySmurf1002 wrote: Now, one can argue which is better, but the end goal here sure seems like they're trying to flatten out the availability of the tier to create more interest in the newer heroes. That's not a terrible goal honestly, since a big gripe is how irrelevant new releases are currently. There was an easy solution to this: Put the latest 12 (or whatever the number is) 4* characters in LATEST LEGENDS tokens, and the older 20-30 4* characters in CLASSIC LEGENDS tokens. Problem solved. Fewer people annoyed. Want the shiny new character? Pony up an extra 5 CP. Want an older one? You got it.
GrumpySmurf1002 wrote: Now, one can argue which is better, but the end goal here sure seems like they're trying to flatten out the availability of the tier to create more interest in the newer heroes. That's not a terrible goal honestly, since a big gripe is how irrelevant new releases are currently.
smkspy wrote: Jaedenkaal wrote: smkspy wrote: Add to that, by favoring characters like starlord or X23 that both sit at 5-1-5, I'm just wasting a chance to add covers to much lower characters that I have 4 or less covers in their powers. In fairness, that's neither better or worse than the previous system. Actually it's probably a little better because you can decide to never see a star-lord or X-23 cover. If you do want to see them, you can (if you want) see them with higher odds than you could yesterday. The chance of getting the colour you want is still only 1/3. True, but give the ultra low chances of these bonus heroes, it's even more of waste imo to invest on them when you know that selecting others will definitely give you a useable cover. As it stands, I'm just better off patently waiting for that fateful day that pve progression gives me starlord yellow or X23 red. However this is work great for me covering all the recent 4s that just sit idling in my roster for months, like Blade.
Borstock wrote: DayvBang wrote: Borstock wrote: Arphaxad wrote: How are players supposed to get 4* covers for older champions? Not all of us can finish in the top 10 of slices to get rewards. By making those characters your "favorites". And then getting very, very lucky. You always needed to be very, very lucky to get the exact color cover of the exact character you need.
DayvBang wrote: Borstock wrote: Arphaxad wrote: How are players supposed to get 4* covers for older champions? Not all of us can finish in the top 10 of slices to get rewards. By making those characters your "favorites". And then getting very, very lucky.
Borstock wrote: Arphaxad wrote: How are players supposed to get 4* covers for older champions? Not all of us can finish in the top 10 of slices to get rewards. By making those characters your "favorites".
Arphaxad wrote: How are players supposed to get 4* covers for older champions? Not all of us can finish in the top 10 of slices to get rewards.
DayvBang wrote: Jaedenkaal wrote: Look on the bright side. You'll never have to see another (randomly-generated) Elektra, Reed, or Brock Venom cover ever again, if you don't want to. Sure, that's great, except that I champed two of those three characters to make their covers into valuable rewards again. Total waste now.
killerkoala wrote: IDK if this was asked earlier but do we get bonus tokens from post event pulls?
mpqr7 wrote: Very cool feature! I'm excited to get additional chances at winning more covers. Thank you!!! My OML is 5/1/5. If I select OML as my favorite, am I guaranteed to win an OML yellow (if I win)? Or I could also win an OML black or red (which won't be helpful for me)? And I only win a 5* if the draw is for a 5*? (5*s are all I really care about currently).
whycantwesyncpc wrote: I'm not pulling any tokens as I'm hoping they come to their senses on this one. Not feeling too motivated to play at all right now.