fmftint wrote: udonomefoo wrote: Why does it seem like so many are hating on the Quake rewards? People just can't tell a good character when they see one? No one's hating, it's just so random for CW
udonomefoo wrote: Why does it seem like so many are hating on the Quake rewards? People just can't tell a good character when they see one?
jackstar0 wrote: Whereas it is taking my Daisy from 10 to 13 covers, so I am delighted!
Moon Roach wrote: In an undocumented change, they've swapped the rewards for rounds 6 and 7. I guess too many alliances were beating round 6 but not round 7 in the first run.
Vhailorx wrote: Moon Roach wrote: In an undocumented change, they've swapped the rewards for rounds 6 and 7. I guess too many alliances were beating round 6 but not round 7 in the first run. Honestly, I never understood why they went 4* cover, 4* cover, LT, 4* cover in the first round. As long as the fixed 4* covers have value (i.e. are for a character that is still undercovered, or a champ), this setup is superior.
"David wrote: Moore"]I got word back from the developers and the removal of Hulkbuster is intended. There is a limited number of characters buffed in each run and he was removed to make room for War Machine.
emaker27 wrote: "David wrote: Moore"]I got word back from the developers and the removal of Hulkbuster is intended. There is a limited number of characters buffed in each run and he was removed to make room for War Machine. This explanation caused a lot of anger because I think it comes across as dismissive due to the brevity. And maybe some of the valid player points got lost in translation. WGLL (What Good Looks Like) is right next door with Hibernum. When they make a somewhat big change they provide insight into their decision making. There are people who still don't completely understand, but the majority get it. We like playing your game and care about it, but would also like greater understanding. We're not entitled to it, but it may foster some good will among your loyal fans. Hibernum Post: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=44515
"David wrote: Moore"] • Difficulty o The surrounding mission pins should have a more gradual ramp in difficulty in this run.
PeeOne wrote: The Hulk wasn't in the movie.... So why should Hulkbuster be powered up?!?! My 2 cents!!
Insert25c wrote: Any one else noticing Iron Boss ignoring Thor's CoS? And no one drone isn't taking his his share of the damage
SnowcaTT wrote: "David wrote: Moore"] • Difficulty o The surrounding mission pins should have a more gradual ramp in difficulty in this run. The subs 2nd day are MUCH tamer, and I for one really appreciate that!