Malcrof wrote: I fully expect to see IW vs BP
Malcrof wrote: Punisher5784 wrote: Thanks Malcrof, as the day goes by, I am seeing more posts who beat it with an undercovered X-Force, but it took them several tries and many boosts. I'll try again later. Regardless it is still disappointing that this is what they chose to implement for 4* DDQ. Not creative or fun. I 100% expected to see Cyc against Wolvie.. they have been at each others throats for 50 years over Jean.. the match makes sense. As for boosting one of the most powerful 3*'s to 270.. that i cannot explain. I fully expect to see IW vs BP (BP actually took on all 4 F4 in 1 on 1 combat, but Susan was put down so quickly that she wanted retribution) .. that will be interesting.
Punisher5784 wrote: Thanks Malcrof, as the day goes by, I am seeing more posts who beat it with an undercovered X-Force, but it took them several tries and many boosts. I'll try again later. Regardless it is still disappointing that this is what they chose to implement for 4* DDQ. Not creative or fun.
Malcrof wrote: If we keep with Hero rivalry theme, Thing should be VS Johnny Storm.. they fight each other more than they fight bad guys. HB VS Hulk is a given. KP vs DD , also should be a given. PX vs Mags
TheRealJRad wrote: This also made me realize, in 444 days, I have never pulled or won an Xforce cover.
dr tinykittylove wrote: How did that song go? "Nobody said it was easy, no one ever said it would be so hard..." I'm glad that after the initial outcry, people who didn't give up came forward to share their success stories. It really was tough. But it was possible with characters without full covers, which is pretty cool. Great job everyone! (I hope the next one is easier anyway - sure most 3*s won't be as deadly as cyclop, but I am totally not looking forward to IW DAY. Or Mr F day. Or, or.... you know how it goes.
ShionSinX wrote: Philly79 wrote: A note to everyone regarding the absence of tu's for players...if we were allowed to use tu's people would just super whale the node making it extremely easy to get a token that you really need to "earn". The AI is granted a tu because we can use ap/dmg boosts...these are my thoughts, no official word from D3 but this would certainly make sense... Wasting one super whale every 5 days to get a gamble (unlike the last DDQ node that you know what you will get) doesn't seems worth even for a 4* transitioner. Don't forget it takes 10 days to get enough DP points for it. No. The game is about progress. That account will get there. Problem is that they skipped a step completely. You need near maxed 4*s to beat this node, while the regular DDQ asks for one cover 3* to get another one. And in an easy fight, 3x3, with boosts and TUs.
Philly79 wrote: A note to everyone regarding the absence of tu's for players...if we were allowed to use tu's people would just super whale the node making it extremely easy to get a token that you really need to "earn". The AI is granted a tu because we can use ap/dmg boosts...these are my thoughts, no official word from D3 but this would certainly make sense...
No. The game is about progress. That account will get there.
killerkoala wrote: next time it'll be cage upper cutting, then jabbing us silly.
ShionSinX wrote: Wasting one super whale every 5 days to get a gamble (unlike the last DDQ node that you know what you will get) doesn't seems worth even for a 4* transitioner. Don't forget it takes 10 days to get enough DP points for it.
gmp72 wrote: Match is clearly designed for Fully loaded 4* star players transitioning to 5*
Philly79 wrote: Wonder who will be featured on Sunday?