[SPOILER] Upcoming characters & contents /2505/

bcas76

And which Cyclops would you prefer?



Let's see, we have the original yellow jumper, and the superheroic underwear-on-the-outside, which is pretty cool and classy. Then we move into the scuba gear era with several variations on the theme, followed by the panties plus completely function-free bandolier, which had surprising staying power compared to the short-lived animated version with awesome shoulder pads. There's my personal favorite: Extreme Mullet Cyclops. We've got the snazzy yellow leather vest uniform before the character's unfortunate steroid scandal, but at least he stopped wearing his underwear over his pants (sadly though, he just substituted his jock strap instead). Then there's some goth **** suit, followed by the current "X of Shame" variant.

I agree, time travel, alternate universes, and teen versions of established characters are played out concepts, and Tyklops is by far the least interesting of the All New X-Men. Hell, they even made Iceman gay. But how else are they going to bring back Jean Grey once per decade , which I'm pretty sure is written into her contract, so they can kill her again?

TLCstormz

ROTF at those descriptions.

Unknown

bcas76 wrote:

And which Cyclops would you prefer?



Let's see, we have the original yellow jumper, and the superheroic underwear-on-the-outside, which is pretty cool and classy. Then we move into the scuba gear era with several variations on the theme, followed by the panties plus completely function-free bandolier, which had surprising staying power compared to the short-lived animated version with awesome shoulder pads. There's my personal favorite: Extreme Mullet Cyclops. We've got the snazzy yellow leather vest uniform before the character's unfortunate steroid scandal, but at least he stopped wearing his underwear over his pants (sadly though, he just substituted his jock strap instead). Then there's some goth **** suit, followed by the current "X of Shame" variant.

I agree, time travel, alternate universes, and teen versions of established characters are played out concepts, and Tyklops is by far the least interesting of the All New X-Men. Hell, they even made Iceman gay. But how else are they going to bring back Jean Grey once per decade , which I'm pretty sure is written into her contract, so they can kill her again?

It's like the most boring party in the universe

Mawtful

I was thinking about the upcoming characters for the next few releases, and the "3*, 3*, 4*" release pattern.

We just had Hulkbuster as the last 4*, and Vision is the next 3*. We're expecting another Cyclops (likely 2*) and a Daredevil villain, maybe Bullseye (likely 3*).

Now that seems to disrupt the pattern a little. Could it be that one of those two is actually going to be a 4*? Or perhaps the next 4* isn't hiding in the code yet?

Unknown

removed because of comment below

ronin_san

hexad_2808 wrote:

My alliance mate just sent us these photos

That's the opposite of discretion that guys like Turul employed. You can get the dev in trouble for just dropping names and powers like that.

You should remove these. Hints. Suggestions. Riddles. Come on, man. I get that it's all cool to hate Demiurge. XFW. Spider-Man. Sentry. Bagneto. Heck; even 2* Thor and 2* Wolverine. They were all cool but neutered because their peers couldn't match their awesomeness.

But early releases like this get people in deep @#%^@#. Even ICEIX doesn't get to reveal details too early.

Unknown

ronin-san wrote:

hexad_2808 wrote:

My alliance mate just sent us these photos

That's the opposite of discretion that guys like Turul employed. You can get the dev in trouble for just dropping names and powers like that.

You should remove these. Hints. Suggestions. Riddles. Come on, man. I get that it's all cool to hate Demiurge. XFW. Spider-Man. Sentry. Bagneto. Heck; even 2* Thor and 2* Wolverine. They were all cool but neutered because their peers couldn't match their awesomeness.

But early releases like this get people in deep @#%^@#. Even ICEIX doesn't get to reveal details too early.

Thanks, you are right, new to forum so didnt know the rules, i have removed the post

Unknown

hexad_2808 wrote:

removed because of comment below

dont just remove it we need to know

ronin_san

hexad_2808 wrote:

Thanks, you are right, new to forum so didnt know the rules, i have removed the post

It's cool. I didn't want you to get in trouble.

And I'm excited to see someone throw paper clips to kill an enemy, and passively get a bonus from it. Speaking of which, did you see the trailer for True Detectives S2?

But it seems a bit psychotic, to lash out details like that. Come on...

Cyclops is a foregone conclusion. They've already discussed colors and abilities for him. But the others are best left cryptically.

Arondite

1.

I'm unstable, it's true,
And with daddy, I've an issue or two.
From my axe (or claw or spear)
None are safe if any are near.

2.
Dead bodies have a price
And I certainly have mine
If the target is in my sights
I'll take them out every time

Unknown

bcas76 wrote:

There's my personal favorite: Extreme Mullet Cyclops.

Yes, please. Business in the front, X-treme(tm) party in the back.

Unknown

so...about them spoilers....put them on a blog maybe? the ones we're not supposed to know about? 3rd party site? somewhere...else?

Cuz I didn't see them and stuff.

That's how the classy games do it.

Unknown

Arondite wrote:

1.

I'm unstable, it's true,
And with daddy, I've an issue or two.
From my axe (or claw or spear)
None are safe if any are near.

2.
Dead bodies have a price
And I certainly have mine
If the target is in my sights
I'll take them out every time

Unsure about the first one, maybe I'm taking parts of it too literally.

That second one sure fits Bullseye tho...

TheHood

Arondite wrote:

1.

I'm unstable, it's true,
And with daddy, I've an issue or two.
From my axe (or claw or spear)
None are safe if any are near.

2.
Dead bodies have a price
And I certainly have mine
If the target is in my sights
I'll take them out every time

Are these descriptions about two different characters or only one?

Dom22

Alexraven wrote:

Arondite wrote:

1.

I'm unstable, it's true,
And with daddy, I've an issue or two.
From my axe (or claw or spear)
None are safe if any are near.

2.
Dead bodies have a price
And I certainly have mine
If the target is in my sights
I'll take them out every time

Unsure about the first one, maybe I'm taking parts of it too literally.

That second one sure fits Bullseye tho...

i believe the 1st one had a MAXIMUM Crossover event in the mid 90's

TheHood

Yeah, the first description perfectly fits Carnage, and the second one could be easily Bullseye.

Unknown

TheHood wrote:

Yeah, the first description perfectly fits Carnage, and the second one could be easily Bullseye.

Agreed. That looks a lot like carnage and his hatred for venom.

atomzed

If it's Carnage tat will be *awesome*!

He's one of the most memorable villain in Spiderman.

Unknown

Carnage.



Some people seem to like him.




I guess.



For some reason.

Unknown

Ben Grimm wrote:

Carnage.



Some people seem to like him.




I guess.



For some reason.

As a fan of carnage i'd like to explain why that may be. For me at the least it was because carnage was so commonly associated with venom and being a guy who likes his bad guys more venom was one of my favorites in the spider-man rogues gallery. So then I saw this character who was basically a more evil venom with seemingly more strength. That's really the reason why I think people like him.

Carnage would be awesome though. I just wish there was a venom who wasn't just 1* before we got carnage. Where's agent venom?