acescracked said: Wumpushunter said: No fix for sniping yet.... This is a very bad way to run a game. Fix one system even though you have not fixed the issues it creates. SC scaling is great, letting 125 level people in CL 6 for their 2 star farms is sheer lunacy. Just lock out characters from each CL, 8 and 9 you can play every character, 7 you can't play 5 stars, CL6 no 5s or 4 star champs except the essential 4, CL 5 no 4s or 5s. That should fix it. Hah, you guys whine that pve even has placement rewards... then whine if someone beats you out of those placement rewards.Ignore the placement and play progression.
Wumpushunter said: No fix for sniping yet.... This is a very bad way to run a game. Fix one system even though you have not fixed the issues it creates. SC scaling is great, letting 125 level people in CL 6 for their 2 star farms is sheer lunacy. Just lock out characters from each CL, 8 and 9 you can play every character, 7 you can't play 5 stars, CL6 no 5s or 4 star champs except the essential 4, CL 5 no 4s or 5s. That should fix it.
Wumpushunter said: acescracked said: Wumpushunter said: No fix for sniping yet.... This is a very bad way to run a game. Fix one system even though you have not fixed the issues it creates. SC scaling is great, letting 125 level people in CL 6 for their 2 star farms is sheer lunacy. Just lock out characters from each CL, 8 and 9 you can play every character, 7 you can't play 5 stars, CL6 no 5s or 4 star champs except the essential 4, CL 5 no 4s or 5s. That should fix it. Hah, you guys whine that pve even has placement rewards... then whine if someone beats you out of those placement rewards.Ignore the placement and play progression. Why so you lofty vets can just pull farther and farther away creating even more of a have have not situation in which those with 1000 days in game push for more and more exclusive content?Yes, i would like them to remove placement but increase the progression rewards because its PVE, not pvp, fighting for placement is competition against others. But they wont do that because it will reward too many people too much. So now they just create a system where the vets are happy and to tiny kitty with the rest of the community.
Thank you!Looking forward to my PVE clear times going down to a reasonable time in CL8, should be 30 minutes tops, if that.Much more suited to a mobile game.
ADChaos said: I'm not quite sure why people think they're so screwed for 4* development now. T10 finishes aren't actually necessary for it, in my experience.
DarthDeVo said: ADChaos said: I'm not quite sure why people think they're so screwed for 4* development now. T10 finishes aren't actually necessary for it, in my experience. I just did in my post. I typically get T5 or T10 in SCL 7 or 8 each event. With an average of two events per week, that's an extra 8-24 4* covers per month. If that's not enough to hamper your 4* progress, then you're playing at a different level than me, because that will certainly slow me down, big time. Perfect example: This most recent event (Meet Rocket and Groot) I ended up in 32nd place overall, due to very unfortunate timing of IRL conflicts for my very last grind; I managed to do only about half of it. Had I gotten my typical T10, I would be able to champ G4ocket with the progression cover from Webbed Wonder. T5, I could have champed them right away. Now they'll be stuck at 12 covers for the foreseeable future. In both tests they ran, I think I finished somewhere in the 20s or 30s for placement, so pretty much where I just ended up in MR&G. If that pattern holds, that means a lot fewer covers earned and much slower progress overall.
Bowgentle said: DarthDeVo said: ADChaos said: I'm not quite sure why people think they're so screwed for 4* development now. T10 finishes aren't actually necessary for it, in my experience. I just did in my post. I typically get T5 or T10 in SCL 7 or 8 each event. With an average of two events per week, that's an extra 8-24 4* covers per month. If that's not enough to hamper your 4* progress, then you're playing at a different level than me, because that will certainly slow me down, big time. Perfect example: This most recent event (Meet Rocket and Groot) I ended up in 32nd place overall, due to very unfortunate timing of IRL conflicts for my very last grind; I managed to do only about half of it. Had I gotten my typical T10, I would be able to champ G4ocket with the progression cover from Webbed Wonder. T5, I could have champed them right away. Now they'll be stuck at 12 covers for the foreseeable future. In both tests they ran, I think I finished somewhere in the 20s or 30s for placement, so pretty much where I just ended up in MR&G. If that pattern holds, that means a lot fewer covers earned and much slower progress overall. Time to level that Panthos, if you want to keep competing with the big boys, then.
Dwarfsteel said: How do these levels compare to the last test run? They seem lower in CL8 than before. Just remember the last test was an absolute unenjoyable slog.
Spoit said: Bowgentle said: DarthDeVo said: ADChaos said: I'm not quite sure why people think they're so screwed for 4* development now. T10 finishes aren't actually necessary for it, in my experience. I just did in my post. I typically get T5 or T10 in SCL 7 or 8 each event. With an average of two events per week, that's an extra 8-24 4* covers per month. If that's not enough to hamper your 4* progress, then you're playing at a different level than me, because that will certainly slow me down, big time. Perfect example: This most recent event (Meet Rocket and Groot) I ended up in 32nd place overall, due to very unfortunate timing of IRL conflicts for my very last grind; I managed to do only about half of it. Had I gotten my typical T10, I would be able to champ G4ocket with the progression cover from Webbed Wonder. T5, I could have champed them right away. Now they'll be stuck at 12 covers for the foreseeable future. In both tests they ran, I think I finished somewhere in the 20s or 30s for placement, so pretty much where I just ended up in MR&G. If that pattern holds, that means a lot fewer covers earned and much slower progress overall. Time to level that Panthos, if you want to keep competing with the big boys, then. And good freaking luck to anyone who missed the boat on that, eh? I look forward to finally covering them around....a decade from now, with my bonus hero rate
Daredevil217 said: jgomes32 said: I'm on the minority, not a big fan of this change. I believe 5* will dominate most SCL7 brackets for even faster clears/grinds and 4* will have no place to go but 6 (and there's still going to be 5* there). It's going to slow down progress for most 4* roster.Maybe locke SCL? Can't go below your SCL level. This is just too easy. Might as well remove placement if it's bassically whoever has the biggest Thanos wins.. You're absolutely not. I hate it too. Hopefully they give us wins based progression permanently in PVP. Otherwise, PVE progression is my only reliable shot at 4* now.
jgomes32 said: I'm on the minority, not a big fan of this change. I believe 5* will dominate most SCL7 brackets for even faster clears/grinds and 4* will have no place to go but 6 (and there's still going to be 5* there). It's going to slow down progress for most 4* roster.Maybe locke SCL? Can't go below your SCL level. This is just too easy. Might as well remove placement if it's bassically whoever has the biggest Thanos wins..