Lucifierso i need you help here about explaining something to me, if i got 5* covers and do not upgrade them. will this effect my PVP matching or not? (i know it will effect the PVE).
Lucifier said: Milk Jugz & Blindmanohhhhhhhhhhh, wait wait, i think this is great news:ok, i have no problem with HP, well for at least 20 more rosters, i guess (i can purchase 20k HP now) and i have 4 or maybe 6 full champed 2* char, could be 8 by end of this week (so this is another 1k HP, and 520k iso).need your helps with these:1- for example at roster 100 or something close, how much one new roster space cost?2- well my highest char is 3* char i think level 174, if i pull 5* that would be level 255, are you sure it will not effect the PVE scaling?? i am currently playing at SCL 7, now i am at shiled rank 46, once i hit 47 i will try the SCL 8, or should i not try it?3- i think i have now 7 or 8 champed 3*, 10 LT 670 CP.4- another reason why i want to spend LT and CP, so i can have as much 4* char as possible for the daily deadpoll, for the before last one fight and for the last rewards, which is vault token (everyday).5- i have all 3* char except one (i think i still don't have the hood).based on these info i really appreciated your advice.
Ducky said: ***Please keep the thread on topic of the OP, if you'd like advice please check out the Tips and Guides section of the forum. Thanks!***
Rod5 said: carrion pigeons said: My personal experience in PvP:Enter the event, do the seeds. Do one more fight against a team of 270s, get super bored, realize I have to do at least 10 more and probably more like 30 more before I get anything worthwhile at it, and quit.I expect that's a pretty typical experience among non-LINE players. PvP sucks. I don't think not having Line is your problem. If you can't be bothered to try and fight any teams on a par with yours then you shouldn't expect to get barely any rewards.
carrion pigeons said: My personal experience in PvP:Enter the event, do the seeds. Do one more fight against a team of 270s, get super bored, realize I have to do at least 10 more and probably more like 30 more before I get anything worthwhile at it, and quit.I expect that's a pretty typical experience among non-LINE players. PvP sucks.
Kahmon said: ... The worst part of PvP is getting beaten back from a reward right before you reach it ...
Kahmon said: ...My suggestion on a previous thread which got 0 feedback ...
Kahmon said: ... People who play most efficiently and game the system ...
Kahmon said: ... that terrible feeling being attacked for a ton during what should be a rewarding fight ...
carrion pigeons said:....Oh, yes, I have loads of 270s on my roster. Waitaminnit...
__________________ carrion pigeons said:....Oh, yes, I have loads of 270s on my roster. Waitaminnit... I am so jealous! I have loads of characters I wish were up to 270. Would you believe I haven't got a single 270? A 267 ... a 271 ... not a single 270.Oh ... you were being sarcastic? No 270s there either? Hey, bright side: we could be "no-270s-havin" roster buddies!
carrion pigeons said: __________________ carrion pigeons said:....Oh, yes, I have loads of 270s on my roster. Waitaminnit... I am so jealous! I have loads of characters I wish were up to 270. Would you believe I haven't got a single 270? A 267 ... a 271 ... not a single 270.Oh ... you were being sarcastic? No 270s there either? Hey, bright side: we could be "no-270s-havin" roster buddies! I actually have no idea what you're trying to say here, so I'm guessing we're talking past each other. Let me try to be more plain.I am a 3* player thrust into face-offs with champed 4*s, and partially levelled 5*s, neither of which I have any of. I do not see 3* teams. I view this as a problem with PvP.There are thousands of 3* players I *could* be matched against, but I'm not. I assume this is because I have a lot of roster slots or some other similar reason. The fact remains that the upshot is I'm facing teams 60-80 levels higher than anything I can field, and this makes matches take too long to compete for meaningful rewards, in addition to making the game excessively boring.I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you don't really have that problem. I seem to recall you saying more than once that players don't lose. Well, I lose maybe one match in four, in PvP, specifically because of bad matchmaking.
Rod5 said: carrion pigeons said: __________________ carrion pigeons said:....Oh, yes, I have loads of 270s on my roster. Waitaminnit... I am so jealous! I have loads of characters I wish were up to 270. Would you believe I haven't got a single 270? A 267 ... a 271 ... not a single 270.Oh ... you were being sarcastic? No 270s there either? Hey, bright side: we could be "no-270s-havin" roster buddies! I actually have no idea what you're trying to say here, so I'm guessing we're talking past each other. Let me try to be more plain.I am a 3* player thrust into face-offs with champed 4*s, and partially levelled 5*s, neither of which I have any of. I do not see 3* teams. I view this as a problem with PvP.There are thousands of 3* players I *could* be matched against, but I'm not. I assume this is because I have a lot of roster slots or some other similar reason. The fact remains that the upshot is I'm facing teams 60-80 levels higher than anything I can field, and this makes matches take too long to compete for meaningful rewards, in addition to making the game excessively boring.I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you don't really have that problem. I seem to recall you saying more than once that players don't lose. Well, I lose maybe one match in four, in PvP, specifically because of bad matchmaking. So skip more? I get matched with lvl 480 5* teams all the time, doesn't mean I have to fight them.
Spudgutter said: Rod5 said: So skip more? I get matched with lvl 480 5* teams all the time, doesn't mean I have to fight them. At some point, i hope that high end players giving tips to 3* transitioners realize that the game is much different then when they came up. The solutions that work for one player, don't always work for others.
Rod5 said: So skip more? I get matched with lvl 480 5* teams all the time, doesn't mean I have to fight them.
carrion pigeons said: The fact remains that the upshot is I'm facing teams 60-80 levels higher than anything I can field, and this makes matches take too long to compete for meaningful rewards, in addition to making the game excessively boring.
The fact remains that the upshot is I'm facing teams 60-80 levels higher than anything I can field, and this makes matches take too long to compete for meaningful rewards, in addition to making the game excessively boring.
aesthetocyst Of course the game has changed. We've all changed with it (or quit). The solutions are the solutions, accept them and benefit from them, or decide the benefit is not worth the cost and reject them. And embrace the costs of doing so.
GrumpySmurf1002 said: This does make a ton of sense, it's a wonder it hasn't been brought up before on here.Unless.......
acescracked said: I thought OP quit the game? And do I only read the bold parts of the post?
Spudgutter said: aesthetocyst Of course the game has changed. We've all changed with it (or quit). The solutions are the solutions, accept them and benefit from them, or decide the benefit is not worth the cost and reject them. And embrace the costs of doing so. Very true. Which is why i want to keep the issue of the pvp test alive. I liked the idea and principle of it, but not the execution. They are probably going to change pvp, people need to accept that. Hopefully, though, we can convince them that the path to more engagement of developing rosters shouldn't come at the expense of the veteran rosters. Leave the the cp in progression, and leave the progression tied to points as well as wins.