New Supports Experience Blog

1356710

Comments

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited March 2023

    And some players keep making stuff up like, "the dev is lying" when they are the one who can't interpret information and context correctly.

  • LavaManLee
    LavaManLee Posts: 1,459 Chairperson of the Boards

    Well, I will be looking for an alliance with zero PVP requirements. It is already a grind and have no desire to actually get involved much with PVP if supports are allowed.

  • DAZ0273
    DAZ0273 Posts: 10,342 Chairperson of the Boards

    @Bzhai said:
    Guys can we not go down this rabbit hole again? Just put on your ignore goggles and let's focus on the main issue. If you feel strongly against the change in pvp it would be more beneficial to give the devs as much feedback and sentiment as possible.

    Personally I will wait for more information, preferably not second hand reported here as to how this all plays out. As I already said there is also a MMR change in the works, who knows how that all adds up and what it means.

  • ThaRoadWarrior
    ThaRoadWarrior Posts: 9,470 Chairperson of the Boards

    Man, this is definitely going to have some knock on effects. I'm very curious how this is going to play out

  • Codex
    Codex Posts: 321 Mover and Shaker

    @entrailbucket said:
    I think it's an issue that literally a few days ago, someone from the publisher told us they have no plans to do this, then today we find out the developers are planning/have been planning to do this (do note that these are two different companies, although they work together closely).

    I don't see the issue. They said there would be no supports in PvP unless there is a change to the UI. If this was taken to be no supports in PvP, I don't see how. There is a condition to their statement.

    As far as we should know the blog info before the end of Kamar taj support offer, I agree it would have impacted my decision to purchase.

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited March 2023

    Scofie is not a developer. He's a moderator of this forum. And I think another moderator has mentioned before what their roles are, and aren't.

    If you want to fully trust information from non-officially approved sources, and then become unhappy when officially approved information differs from unofficial ones, then it's on you, not the dev.

    Supports are not even activated in pvps yet, and there are already resistant to changes. Go get this book called "Who Moved My Cheese?", read it and learn to adapt.

  • DAZ0273
    DAZ0273 Posts: 10,342 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited March 2023

    @HoundofShadow said:
    Scofie is not a developer. He's a moderator of this forum. And I think another moderator has mentioned before what their roles are, and aren't.

    If you want to fully trust information from non-officially approved sources, and then become unhappy when officially approved information differs from unofficial ones, then it's on you, not the dev.

    Supports are not even activated in pvps yet, and there are already resistant to changes. Go get this book called "Who Moved My Cheese?", read it and learn to adapt.

    Scofie would have had nothing to quote if the Devs had stayed quiet. Or even better, before you released a brand new Support with ramifications for PvP you provide advance information to inform players on purchase choices. This is not on Scofie, it is on the person who issued the non officially approved information on the non officially approved media platform. Simples.

    BTW - in most other industries, information provided through a non official channel is normally described as "a leak".

  • HoundofShadow
    HoundofShadow Posts: 8,004 Chairperson of the Boards

    Let me state some facts, as far as some players being unhappy with the information about supports being activated in pvp is concerned:

    BCS posted and said to wait for approval for more information about future of Support.

    Thanks for this thread. We have an official post that is currently wrapping up approvals that help to clarify some points and give some further insight on the future of Supports. Should answer a few questions and spawn some discussion.

    S0kun wrote:

    Our next blog is going to be a good one folks. Apologies for not having it ready this week, but some of your questions will be answered next week if things go as planned. Fingers crossed.

    Scofie posted something from Discord, and some of you ate it up like it has been approved or it's some kind of immutable truth. As a matter of fact, at the time of posting, announcement was still undergoing Marvel approval.

    After this official blog is out, some of you were unhappy supports will be activated in pvps, and decided to bring up Scofie's replies last week.

  • liminal_lad
    liminal_lad Posts: 477 Mover and Shaker

    @BriMan2222 said:

    @Tony_Foot said:
    No one wanted them to bypass the approval process, they wanted them to hold off any releases until the information was available. You just keep making stuff up to bash 'players'.

    I didn't care if it took another week to release. In the same way I don't care if they take longer to release content that works and doesn't break the game. Is that too much to ask for?

    I honestly don't know why anyone bothers to engage with Hound anymore. He doesn't have real conversations, he doesn't reply to things people have actually said, he just makes strawmen arguments replying to things that imaginary "players" have said in his imagination. It's just a waste of time. No one is ever going to change his mind about anything, he's living in his own world where "players" are constantly attacking the omnipotent and benevolent devs.

    This is solid advice. I started to respond directly and this was a good reminder of how counterproductive it is.

  • Scofie
    Scofie GLOBAL_MODERATORS Posts: 1,394 Chairperson of the Boards

    Mod mode off

    Here is the double-edged sword of comms. Players want info and there are channels to get that info immediately rather than waiting for the "official" announcement. Me being a mod on here is irrelevant to some degree - I asked a question on discord and it got answered. I repeated that answer here.

    My personal view on the blog announcement is this: if supports in PvP was a year away because of UI changes and it wasn't announced for 9 months, people would say it should've been announced here as the strategy for supports going forward. I don't know where the UI is on the roadmap. I don't know if it will stay there. I'm guessing it's sufficiently far enough away to not be able to put any timescales on it. So announcing the intention is right at this moment in time. They clearly want supports to be an integral and interesting part of the game and PvP is a big part of that, so they tried to join up the player base by getting everyone excited for the journey ahead.

    It's not lying, it's not misinformation, it's not people misunderstanding the data or the messaging. It's a point in time assessment and that's a little fluid depending on how you are looking at it.