acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it.
entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt.
entrailbucket said: acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it. I didn't say this was a minor change. If it's causing you serious problems, the way to get that point across is to stop playing until it's fixed. Posting feedback here may carry some weight but ultimately, continuing to engage with the game will outweigh any negative feedback here. incorrect — and it’s counterproductive advice.
Yepyep said: entrailbucket said: acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it. I didn't say this was a minor change. If it's causing you serious problems, the way to get that point across is to stop playing until it's fixed. Posting feedback here may carry some weight but ultimately, continuing to engage with the game will outweigh any negative feedback here. incorrect — and it’s counterproductive advice. Your comments in this vein are incorrect. You’ve been a member here long enough to know that if you’ve been even minimally active in keeping up since 2014. 1. Why would they bother to sponsor a forum if there is no intention to monitor the valuable, free feedback volunteered here? 2. While perhaps non-optimal in frequency, there are numerous well-known examples of developers responding to our feedback here. 3. This thread is being actively monitored and moderated. Attention is obviously on it. 4. It seems unlikely that encouraging quitting is your motivation, but it comes off that way. Why discourage player feedback in favor of quitting? Seems like a slow route to better placement for you, but your advice is illogical otherwise. Anyway, find another thread to promote your theories on productive player feedback. This thread is too important to sabotage.
turbomoose said: been trying to play for about a few hours since the change The most annoying thing for me apart from the dark screen on the AI’s turn is that it’s very difficult to know when you have a power ready , yellow doesn’t seem to flash at all nice attempt at improving the game but sadly it just doesn’t work for so many reasons
DAZ0273 said:It is a shame but the whole game now feels slightly depressing, like we were playing it previously in a bright garden on a summer day and now we got locked in the basement with Morrissey and Robert Smith.
entrailbucket said: Yepyep said: entrailbucket said: acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it. I didn't say this was a minor change. If it's causing you serious problems, the way to get that point across is to stop playing until it's fixed. Posting feedback here may carry some weight but ultimately, continuing to engage with the game will outweigh any negative feedback here. incorrect — and it’s counterproductive advice. Your comments in this vein are incorrect. You’ve been a member here long enough to know that if you’ve been even minimally active in keeping up since 2014. 1. Why would they bother to sponsor a forum if there is no intention to monitor the valuable, free feedback volunteered here? 2. While perhaps non-optimal in frequency, there are numerous well-known examples of developers responding to our feedback here. 3. This thread is being actively monitored and moderated. Attention is obviously on it. 4. It seems unlikely that encouraging quitting is your motivation, but it comes off that way. Why discourage player feedback in favor of quitting? Seems like a slow route to better placement for you, but your advice is illogical otherwise. Anyway, find another thread to promote your theories on productive player feedback. This thread is too important to sabotage. I wasn't talking about players who merely dislike the update. For some players the change is apparently causing serious health consequences, including migraines and/or seizures. I don't think it's counterproductive to say that those players should stop playing unless/until it's changed.
whitecat31 said: PLEASE UPDATE THE GAME AND PLACE A WARNING THAT IT MAY CAUSE EPILEPTIC SEIZURES.
DAZ0273 said: Yepyep said: entrailbucket said: acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it. I didn't say this was a minor change. If it's causing you serious problems, the way to get that point across is to stop playing until it's fixed. Posting feedback here may carry some weight but ultimately, continuing to engage with the game will outweigh any negative feedback here. incorrect — and it’s counterproductive advice. Your comments in this vein are incorrect. You’ve been a member here long enough to know that if you’ve been even minimally active in keeping up since 2014. 1. Why would they bother to sponsor a forum if there is no intention to monitor the valuable, free feedback volunteered here? 2. While perhaps non-optimal in frequency, there are numerous well-known examples of developers responding to our feedback here. 3. This thread is being actively monitored and moderated. Attention is obviously on it. 4. It seems unlikely that encouraging quitting is your motivation, but it comes off that way. Why discourage player feedback in favor of quitting? Seems like a slow route to better placement for you, but your advice is illogical otherwise. Anyway, find another thread to promote your theories on productive player feedback. This thread is too important to sabotage. I went back to Facebook and scrolled a bit more - it took 43 comments for somebody to say they liked the change. I then scrolled a further 57 comments and found 3 more positive comments. So from 100 comments, there are 4 positives ones in that sample. I mean I guess they could all be disgruntled Forumites but that seems a bit unlikely.
Captain_Carlman said: DAZ0273 said: Yepyep said: entrailbucket said: acescracked said: entrailbucket said: If a video game you like to play is causing you physical pain/health issues...there are literally thousands of video games to play that are just as fun as this one that won't cause those problems for you. If a large number of people stop playing the game completely as a result of this change, it will be reverted or altered. If you continue to play despite changes that cause you physical pain, all they will see is that player engagement is steady. Vote with your feet.This forum represents a tiny, tiny portion of the playerbase and is historically well-known for violently overreacting to minor changes, so feedback from here is going to be taken with a giant grain of salt. But I play not with my feet but my hands.Grain of salt? Gambit nerf, bishop nerf, pve tapping, maybe time slices a little. That's just what I remember without thinking about what the forum has been involved in changing. Anyone else remember some?You honestly think this complete aesthetic change to the game board that we interact with 100% of the time when playing is a "minor" change? C'mon man!Full disclosure - I did post that this change doesn't bother me and I'd be able to get used to it. I didn't say this was a minor change. If it's causing you serious problems, the way to get that point across is to stop playing until it's fixed. Posting feedback here may carry some weight but ultimately, continuing to engage with the game will outweigh any negative feedback here. incorrect — and it’s counterproductive advice. Your comments in this vein are incorrect. You’ve been a member here long enough to know that if you’ve been even minimally active in keeping up since 2014. 1. Why would they bother to sponsor a forum if there is no intention to monitor the valuable, free feedback volunteered here? 2. While perhaps non-optimal in frequency, there are numerous well-known examples of developers responding to our feedback here. 3. This thread is being actively monitored and moderated. Attention is obviously on it. 4. It seems unlikely that encouraging quitting is your motivation, but it comes off that way. Why discourage player feedback in favor of quitting? Seems like a slow route to better placement for you, but your advice is illogical otherwise. Anyway, find another thread to promote your theories on productive player feedback. This thread is too important to sabotage. I went back to Facebook and scrolled a bit more - it took 43 comments for somebody to say they liked the change. I then scrolled a further 57 comments and found 3 more positive comments. So from 100 comments, there are 4 positives ones in that sample. I mean I guess they could all be disgruntled Forumites but that seems a bit unlikely. I noticed this in their FB post about the new UI as well. Many, many comments mentioning the same issues being reported in this thread. Also decided to look at Google Play reviews for the game and while the game still has a pretty high score, a number of recent reviews are mentioning the same issues with the UI and while there were certainly a number of 1-star ratings, a number of users have stated they are having issues with it but haven't lowered their review score yet because they're hopeful a fix is coming sooner than later. So it's definitely not just here on this forum where people are having issues.
BlackBoltRocks said: DAZ0273 said:It is a shame but the whole game now feels slightly depressing, like we were playing it previously in a bright garden on a summer day and now we got locked in the basement with Morrissey and Robert Smith. Robert Smith is fine. Morrissey though...At least it isn't Piers Morgan.
HoundofShadow said: Interesting. How does other game developers accomodate to those three types of colourblindness? Is there some ISO standard for choices of colours or shades?