Waddles_Pines said: DAZ0273 said: bluewolf said: DAZ0273 said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire. I was late to the party with Buffy starting on Season 4 (it used to get shown on BBC2 in the UK in the old "Star Trek Re-run" slot) and I have never seen the Buffy film. Definitely one for a "to do list". Only for completionist reasons......it's not nearly as good as the show. I watched part of it recently and I don't really think it holds up so well. It's a bit heavy on the camp side of things. Although maybe that's more your taste?There's probably a video of Reubens' stuff from the movie which would take less time to watch. Not particularly, although 60s Batman camp levels probably be OK. I am re-watching Buffy right now with my wife so I will probably wait until I am done to go looking for the film If you haven't, watch Angel also. The first season was terrible, but it gets a lot better after that. You can even skip season 1 altogether. One of the actors committed suicide irl, and it was pseudo re-booted to start season 2.
DAZ0273 said: bluewolf said: DAZ0273 said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire. I was late to the party with Buffy starting on Season 4 (it used to get shown on BBC2 in the UK in the old "Star Trek Re-run" slot) and I have never seen the Buffy film. Definitely one for a "to do list". Only for completionist reasons......it's not nearly as good as the show. I watched part of it recently and I don't really think it holds up so well. It's a bit heavy on the camp side of things. Although maybe that's more your taste?There's probably a video of Reubens' stuff from the movie which would take less time to watch. Not particularly, although 60s Batman camp levels probably be OK. I am re-watching Buffy right now with my wife so I will probably wait until I am done to go looking for the film
bluewolf said: DAZ0273 said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire. I was late to the party with Buffy starting on Season 4 (it used to get shown on BBC2 in the UK in the old "Star Trek Re-run" slot) and I have never seen the Buffy film. Definitely one for a "to do list". Only for completionist reasons......it's not nearly as good as the show. I watched part of it recently and I don't really think it holds up so well. It's a bit heavy on the camp side of things. Although maybe that's more your taste?There's probably a video of Reubens' stuff from the movie which would take less time to watch.
DAZ0273 said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire. I was late to the party with Buffy starting on Season 4 (it used to get shown on BBC2 in the UK in the old "Star Trek Re-run" slot) and I have never seen the Buffy film. Definitely one for a "to do list".
ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire.
bluewolf said: Waddles_Pines said: DAZ0273 said: bluewolf said: DAZ0273 said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I just had to look into it, didn't realize Whedon was involved in the '92 Buffy feature film. Paul Reubens was a lot of fun in that as a decidedly non-Pee Wee Herman vampire. I was late to the party with Buffy starting on Season 4 (it used to get shown on BBC2 in the UK in the old "Star Trek Re-run" slot) and I have never seen the Buffy film. Definitely one for a "to do list". Only for completionist reasons......it's not nearly as good as the show. I watched part of it recently and I don't really think it holds up so well. It's a bit heavy on the camp side of things. Although maybe that's more your taste?There's probably a video of Reubens' stuff from the movie which would take less time to watch. Not particularly, although 60s Batman camp levels probably be OK. I am re-watching Buffy right now with my wife so I will probably wait until I am done to go looking for the film If you haven't, watch Angel also. The first season was terrible, but it gets a lot better after that. You can even skip season 1 altogether. One of the actors committed suicide irl, and it was pseudo re-booted to start season 2. The character was killed off during season 1 (Doyle) (Spoilers for a 21 year old TV show), a couple years before the actor died of a drug overdose. He was struggling with addiction at the time.Most TV shows back then got better in later seasons (assuming they got better)......so it's not surprising this one did too.
krakenoon said: While there is no Dan GR in the game, we do have Jonny & Robbie. I will say Namor seemed long overdue considering how long he was in the comics. As far as the most lacking in representation, Nightcrawler, Banshee, Betsy Braddock and Beast all get my vote (at least w/ X-Men). Now, what’s really going to upset me is when we don’t get classic artwork from the comics when they start releasing New Mutants and the exclusion of Warlock.
DAZ0273 said: Spider-man is the only top character throughout Marvel's history in my opinion and until the MCU the only one to rank along side the DC trinity. Everybody else has fluctuated although possibly Wolverine comes close over the last 25 years. In the early 80s, Thor and Daredevil were tier 1 guys simply due to the popularity of their creators/runs at that time. The same can be said of the FF (Lee/Kirby), X-Men and Punisher. Hulk has enduring public recognition but before the MCU he was little more than a green monster unless you remembered his TV show. Spider-man endures beyond all.
IHoundofShadow said: Costume is back again: 6 covers of Kamala Khan and her costume for $15.
Projectus2501 said: I am really enjoying the kitty chat and it's nice to see that she has lots of fans. Still, she's not a top tier char in marvel nor in popularity nor in power.Legion is an omega level mutant. But I agree that he's not a known/popular char.But... Moving away from that. How about the ultra mighty known and powerful okoye?
HoundofShadow said: So, three 3* covers cost 2100 HP? Coincidentally, three hundred 3* shards cost 700 HP.