2.8 Release Notes *Updated (7/30/18)
Comments
-
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.3 -
Flavor-wise, there’s an error in the post. Sarkhan Fireblood is actually well after he breaks free from Bolas and begins acting as an independent hero. I know this doesn’t matter gameplay-wise, but it might be interesting to know for players who don’t have a background in MTG.2
-
Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.I dread the day they nerf cards like Deploy, Olivia, Pig...honestly it would be a significant deterrent for me playing the game if they did, as it would significantly lengthen legacy matches, and I spend enough time playing this game as is.3 -
Funny, most people are complaining that there isn't enough to do in game. I would assume slightly longer matches would help that a bit. Unless you just want a hundred 1 minute long matches instead of 25 5 minute long onesFindingHeart8 said:Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.I dread the day they nerf cards like Deploy, Olivia, Pig...honestly it would be a significant deterrent for me playing the game if they did, as it would significantly lengthen legacy matches, and I spend enough time playing this game as is.0 -
If I play ToTP, RIV, and clearing all nodes in whatever the flavor of the day event is, that's usually 3 to 4 hours of gameplay per day. That's a significant time commitment for anyone with a full-time job, social life, etc.Mburn7 said:
Funny, most people are complaining that there isn't enough to do in game. I would assume slightly longer matches would help that a bit. Unless you just want a hundred 1 minute long matches instead of 25 5 minute long onesFindingHeart8 said:Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.I dread the day they nerf cards like Deploy, Olivia, Pig...honestly it would be a significant deterrent for me playing the game if they did, as it would significantly lengthen legacy matches, and I spend enough time playing this game as is.
9 -
Not a super nerf. Cycling dominated legacy as much as it did standard. It was needed to balance out game play going forward, especially in legacy. You can still do the effects desired, but no more of this 3000 drakes because you can in turn one. (If you've got the time that isMark_Tedin said:Ok, let's go ... First of all, I congratulate you for listening to the forum participants a lot. It have many good things like Land Support Changes (mainly Zhalfirin Void), General Changes (Naru, Traxos, Haphazardous Bombardment), Training Grounds - Standard PVP, Shield Number, bug fixes...BUT....I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks! 
) besides the drakes, NP, Faith of devoted and cheap cycle cards all fit within the nerf hammer parameters set down by Oktagon. Dominate strategy and loop effect that allowed endless cycling for the win. 2 -
It is ... thank goodness I have no life!FindingHeart8 said:
If I play ToTP, RIV, and clearing all nodes in whatever the flavor of the day event is, that's usually 3 to 4 hours of gameplay per day. That's a significant time commitment for anyone with a full-time job, social life, etc.Mburn7 said:
Funny, most people are complaining that there isn't enough to do in game. I would assume slightly longer matches would help that a bit. Unless you just want a hundred 1 minute long matches instead of 25 5 minute long onesFindingHeart8 said:Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.I dread the day they nerf cards like Deploy, Olivia, Pig...honestly it would be a significant deterrent for me playing the game if they did, as it would significantly lengthen legacy matches, and I spend enough time playing this game as is.
0 -
As the one of the biggest "do not nerf cycling" apologist on this forum, I kinda like how devs fixed it. Still going to be playable and pretty powerful. Besides that, faith of the devoted was the best wincon anyway.
Also, LOL. If you havent been touching cycling for all this time (about a year?), why would you change it now? To make that Ominous Sphinx playable? xd0 -
The set looks great overall. I'm pleased.However, am I correct that there are only two cards in M19 that have Flash? Chromium and Murder?Huh. I understand wanting to slow roll a tricky new mechanic, but it really seems like we could have had a couple of others if you wanted to test the waters effectively.0
-
This will be the first time since BFZ where we don't have any truly strong green gem converters. I guess we will be seeing a lot of blue in the future!3
-
It's probably the same thing that they did with Leader. You only put in on a few cards to get all the bugs ironed out, and then start using it as a normal mechanic going forward.madwren said:The set looks great overall. I'm pleased.However, am I correct that there are only two cards in M19 that have Flash? Chromium and Murder?Huh. I understand wanting to slow roll a tricky new mechanic, but it really seems like we could have had a couple of others if you wanted to test the waters effectively.
It also allows it to ease its way into our strategizing, so we aren't just flooded with a brand new mechanic immediately.0 -
Hi Everyone,
I've confirmed with the team that Origins will in fact remain in Standard, and Hour of Devastation will be rotating into Legacy, when Core Set 2019 arrives. I've added this information into the main post.
Don't worry! We're working with Octal9 on getting him the resources he needs to put the card gallery up on his site.James13 said:Hopefully the official gallery goes up soon, considering the facebook post shows them.
Otherwise, I don't know why D3 seem to be trolling Octal ever since the feature about his resource!
*looks at flavor-text* Oh! Looks like that was my fault. To keep the post as short as possible, I only included the first sentence of each of the Planeswalker's back-story. Looks like the story continues on to explain how Ajani's victory changed Sarkhan. You can check out the full story, once he arrives in gameElektrophorus said:Flavor-wise, there’s an error in the post. Sarkhan Fireblood is actually well after he breaks free from Bolas and begins acting as an independent hero. I know this doesn’t matter gameplay-wise, but it might be interesting to know for players who don’t have a background in MTG. 4 -
Lack of green gems changers when hod rotates out is worrying me too.
Will m19 add illusion creatures? So far only 2 exist in the entire game and more are needed to make cute Jace more cute.0 -
Mburn7 said:Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks! I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.
They kind of did in the monthly questionnaire response... I think maybe March? or April? Stated that they are looking at balancing cards once they were caught up so as to reduce the problems of power hikes and improve lesser used cards.
Ha! I can see it coming...Mburn7 said:
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.
0 -
I think there might just be 1 illusion in M19. I may be wrong, though. Don't blame Oktagon for the lack, though. Blame WOTCTheros said:Lack of green gems changers when hod rotates out is worrying me too.
Will m19 add illusion creatures? So far only 2 exist in the entire game and more are needed to make cute Jace more cute.0 -
I never had the likes of Rishkar or HoP so I've had to do with Beneath the Sands and Thunderherd Migration and they're fine. The 5 for 5 from DOM isn't bad either. I'm glad there's no easymode mythic gem convertor. I'm gonna miss HuF though.0
-
The problem is that with the lack of ramp, those expensive creatures are going to be a problem. I understand Oktagon wants us to play those gem changing supports they just balanced but c'mon... Ironic they themselves mentioned that green should retain mass gem changing capabilities.
And no... Thunderherd Migration doesn't quite cut it... I used to think HoP was bad and to be frank it was probably the perfect balance when looking at absurdities like Rishksex, Renewal and Season's Past. But I really don't want to get back to poor conditional gem changers like Animist's Awakening.
I thought people wanted fast options to not make matches last FOREVER... without ramp, good luck!
(oh wait, we have StV so I guess people are fine with that now)0 -
@Brigby so is Core being treated like any other set? What are the long-term plans for Core and it's position in standard? Can you provide any additional clarification on these matters?0
-
FindingHeart8 said:
If I play ToTP, RIV, and clearing all nodes in whatever the flavor of the day event is, that's usually 3 to 4 hours of gameplay per day. That's a significant time commitment for anyone with a full-time job, social life, etc.Mburn7 said:
Funny, most people are complaining that there isn't enough to do in game. I would assume slightly longer matches would help that a bit. Unless you just want a hundred 1 minute long matches instead of 25 5 minute long onesFindingHeart8 said:Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.I dread the day they nerf cards like Deploy, Olivia, Pig...honestly it would be a significant deterrent for me playing the game if they did, as it would significantly lengthen legacy matches, and I spend enough time playing this game as is.
They just need to get it to 25 hours of content a day to flip the switch in your brain from "How do I do it all?" to "Which bits do I do?".
Grin.
(It actually happens much earlier than 25 hours, but it varies with individual.)2 -
Don't forget about Mirrorpool getting the nerf. Wasn't that a paid card too?Mburn7 said:
I'm confused. Why is it ok to nerf a standard card but not a legacy one? All cards hit legacy eventually (usually about a year). Why does them being slightly older make them inherently immune to balancing? Oktagon announced that they would be balancing older sets when they first started. Its a little surprising we didn't get a heads up, but not that it happened.Mark_Tedin said:I sincerely disagree with the SUPER NERF's Cycling cards and other legacy cards (Shire of the Forsaken Gods). Please, do not nerf our legacy. This is one of the most fun parts of the game. Thanks!
Cycling needed a nerf a year and a half ago. But Oktagon wasn't around then, and when they started they had to focus on catching the sets up to paper. The cycling nerf is fine. You should not be able to win with nothing but cycling.
I find it interesting that the legacy cards that got changed are mostly not the overpowered ones (Olivia, Pig, Ulrich..ect) but were definitely still probably needed. And some cards were buffed, not nerfed! Balance!
I am waiting for someone to request a refund for their money buy of Shrine, though. That would be hilarious.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements