fmftint said: Not that anyone cares but too long to bring me back, my MPQ days are long past
Anon said: D3 doesn't do slight nerfs. If they nerf, they murder the character.
Kolence said: Very happy that Bishop and jumpy Cap won't be as easy to work for the AI.Happy that older characters are being improved and also that we are getting this many "minor" adjustments, AP costs and damage and maybe other numbers slightly changed, in one go. I don't think either Bishop or Cap got "nerfed into the ground". Well, maybe compared to what they were capable of before... Compared to other 4-stars, though? I believe they'll still work ok. It will just require some team building and maybe even playing skill? Instead of just being there and letting a 5-star make a simple match-3...Man... these final couple of weeks of waiting will be the hardest.
sambrookjm said: Vhailorx said: Therealsmkspy said: While I expected this for a while, kinda makes me sad that I almost got to champ my Hawkeye to use with Worthy. So close, but so far. Oh well, shrug. don't feel bad for now: HE/Coulson/Gamora is untouched, so we still have a good cl10 challenge node option. I just hope you didn't plan to rely on HE/worthy for PVP. 4-star Gamora for Worthy Cap? She's got a cheap stun, but no auto-AP generation, which is what made Worthy nerfable. Do you bring in Blue AP to start the match to get her stunning started?
Vhailorx said: Therealsmkspy said: While I expected this for a while, kinda makes me sad that I almost got to champ my Hawkeye to use with Worthy. So close, but so far. Oh well, shrug. don't feel bad for now: HE/Coulson/Gamora is untouched, so we still have a good cl10 challenge node option. I just hope you didn't plan to rely on HE/worthy for PVP.
Therealsmkspy said: While I expected this for a while, kinda makes me sad that I almost got to champ my Hawkeye to use with Worthy. So close, but so far. Oh well, shrug.
HoundofShadow said: Not every player are interested in only building meta teams. There are players who use characters to discover synergies that are fun. The answer would be: whenever playes want to have fun with characters and test out different strategies.
JHawkInc said: I like the changes.I like seeing a bundle of them at once. That kinda balances out the news a little for people who aren't excited about any one change.I like just having a little bit of explanation written into it all, instead of a clinical "opinion-free" chart of before and after. (I think I might like this part more than the fact that there are changes to begin with)Also, a month before Anniversary? All things considered this has been a pretty fantastic year (weren't rebalances on the bottom of the list when things were getting shifted from the office to work-from-home earlier this year?), looking forward to ringing in the next one for MPQ!
DyingLegend said: IceIX said: DyingLegend said: My question is, with worthy cap, does he negate the damage of a 4 match ability as well, such as prof x or onslaught? I can't say with 110% surety since ya know, not released yet, but the current plan is that yes, he'll block the full damage from that attack. Thanks for the answer, this makes him more intriguing and still have a place in rosters .
IceIX said: DyingLegend said: My question is, with worthy cap, does he negate the damage of a 4 match ability as well, such as prof x or onslaught? I can't say with 110% surety since ya know, not released yet, but the current plan is that yes, he'll block the full damage from that attack.
DyingLegend said: My question is, with worthy cap, does he negate the damage of a 4 match ability as well, such as prof x or onslaught?
Glockoma said: JHawkInc said: I like the changes.I like seeing a bundle of them at once. That kinda balances out the news a little for people who aren't excited about any one change.I like just having a little bit of explanation written into it all, instead of a clinical "opinion-free" chart of before and after. (I think I might like this part more than the fact that there are changes to begin with)Also, a month before Anniversary? All things considered this has been a pretty fantastic year (weren't rebalances on the bottom of the list when things were getting shifted from the office to work-from-home earlier this year?), looking forward to ringing in the next one for MPQ! This is great feedback that I agree with wholeheartedly.I, too, have my opinions on the specifics, but big picture time: ACTUAL rebalancing(!), with approaches, and in batches no less!This is a stark difference from the MPQ the first 5 years I played. Year 6 looks to be quite a good year if we keep on this path....and yeah, Bring back old school 4* Wolverine!
Vhailorx said: Glockoma said: JHawkInc said: I like the changes.I like seeing a bundle of them at once. That kinda balances out the news a little for people who aren't excited about any one change.I like just having a little bit of explanation written into it all, instead of a clinical "opinion-free" chart of before and after. (I think I might like this part more than the fact that there are changes to begin with)Also, a month before Anniversary? All things considered this has been a pretty fantastic year (weren't rebalances on the bottom of the list when things were getting shifted from the office to work-from-home earlier this year?), looking forward to ringing in the next one for MPQ! This is great feedback that I agree with wholeheartedly.I, too, have my opinions on the specifics, but big picture time: ACTUAL rebalancing(!), with approaches, and in batches no less!This is a stark difference from the MPQ the first 5 years I played. Year 6 looks to be quite a good year if we keep on this path....and yeah, Bring back old school 4* Wolverine! You do remember that, off the top of my head, cmags, im40, and riri were all successfully reworked during the first 5 years of MPQ, with the latter two becoming among the best characters in their respective tiers (without being OP) after their reworks, right?Yes, it's been a while since we had reworks (especially reworks that explicitly tried to buff anyone) but let's not pretend that this hasn't happened before.