nick_chicane said: Should a fight be that tough that its dependent on whether you get a decent board to whether you can win it?
Should a fight be that tough that its dependent on whether you get a decent board to whether you can win it?
. Should a fight be that tough that its dependent on whether you get a decent board to whether you can win it?
Bowgentle said: Dragon_Nexus said: I'm curious actually.The levels in CL9 suggest your roster would go beyond simply boosted 4*s and nudge into the realm of high level or champed 5*s.And at that point...is getting a single 4* cover for a top 50 placement really an effective reward? Those kinds of posts always crack me up.My 4s are getting to 370 the same way yours are, one level at a time.Of course every 4* cover matters.
Dragon_Nexus said: I'm curious actually.The levels in CL9 suggest your roster would go beyond simply boosted 4*s and nudge into the realm of high level or champed 5*s.And at that point...is getting a single 4* cover for a top 50 placement really an effective reward?
Rick OShay said: Bowgentle said: Dragon_Nexus said: I'm curious actually.The levels in CL9 suggest your roster would go beyond simply boosted 4*s and nudge into the realm of high level or champed 5*s.And at that point...is getting a single 4* cover for a top 50 placement really an effective reward? Those kinds of posts always crack me up.My 4s are getting to 370 the same way yours are, one level at a time.Of course every 4* cover matters. If the question above is 'silly' enough to make you laugh, why don't you try to give an appropriate response on why so many 5* rosters are posting here saying that the rewards are Not high enough to justify going into CL9.I laugh at posts from people who think they are too cool to post helpful and meaningful replies.
rowdster said: I really need some help on the "star-lord amsome mix vol2" effort. The mutations and carriers are destroying anything I try. They are all level 490, and that's stupid.My star-lord is 2/5/5 lv 260. I've tried OML/Thanos, Steve Rogers/IM40, Black Widow, ice-man, and a few others. Help!
Tony Foot said: . Should a fight be that tough that its dependent on whether you get a decent board to whether you can win it? Yes. Should the game be so easy that you win no matter how bad the board is? The whole game is built around gambling and luck of the draw and things you have no control over. Why should a tough match be any different?
Dragon_Nexus said: Bowgentle said: Dragon_Nexus said: I'm curious actually.The levels in CL9 suggest your roster would go beyond simply boosted 4*s and nudge into the realm of high level or champed 5*s.And at that point...is getting a single 4* cover for a top 50 placement really an effective reward? Those kinds of posts always crack me up.My 4s are getting to 370 the same way yours are, one level at a time.Of course every 4* cover matters. Yeah but if you have champed or even high level 5*s, do you still need to slowly level up your 4*s?I'm honestly asking.