While I disagree that the AI is "cheating" in any way, I do agree that it is sometimes a little too optimized for my taste. Being able to make multiple primary color swaps per turn while leaving me with nothing but loyalty swaps at clutch moments is quite frustrating.
There is no discernible pattern though. The only consistent theory is that if you are running a lower quality deck than your opponent you can get quite easily overrun. The only solution for improving gameplay is to improve matchmaking.
Most of my event losses in the past few weeks have been from players submitting decks that have not been modified for objectives. There were only a few losses to decks where I spotted at least one card that could be used to satisfy an objective.
Steeme said: While I disagree that the AI is "cheating" in any way, I do agree that it is sometimes a little too optimized for my taste. Being able to make multiple primary color swaps per turn while leaving me with nothing but loyalty swaps at clutch moments is quite frustrating.There is no discernible pattern though. The only consistent theory is that if you are running a lower quality deck than your opponent you can get quite easily overrun. The only solution for improving gameplay is to improve matchmaking.Most of my event losses in the past few weeks have been from players submitting decks that have not been modified for objectives. There were only a few losses to decks where I spotted at least one card that could be used to satisfy an objective.
toastie said: Steeme said: While I disagree that the AI is "cheating" in any way, I do agree that it is sometimes a little too optimized for my taste. Being able to make multiple primary color swaps per turn while leaving me with nothing but loyalty swaps at clutch moments is quite frustrating.There is no discernible pattern though. The only consistent theory is that if you are running a lower quality deck than your opponent you can get quite easily overrun. The only solution for improving gameplay is to improve matchmaking.Most of my event losses in the past few weeks have been from players submitting decks that have not been modified for objectives. There were only a few losses to decks where I spotted at least one card that could be used to satisfy an objective. I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take
Ohboy said: toastie said: I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take It's not. I've tested this many times.
toastie said: I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take
toastie said: Ohboy said: toastie said: I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take It's not. I've tested this many times. Interesting. How did you test this?
Ohboy said: toastie said: Ohboy said: toastie said: I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take It's not. I've tested this many times. Interesting. How did you test this? Mirror match, I match something on a top corner instead of the suggested gem. AI doesn't take its own suggestion.
I've experienced quite the opposite, however, with a caveat. When the AI makes a suggestion which I then ignore in favor of a different match, my experience thus far is that the AI will consistently take the match that it suggested a moment ago.
However, if my defiance results in a gem arrangement which offers a superior match for the AI - a more appropriate color match, a four-fer, or a fiver, for example - the AI will not take it's original suggestion and go with the more favorable match.
In addition, I have encountered a few "defiant matches" which actually resulted in a rather favorable cascade. Being the ghost-in-the-machine cynic that I am, it's my belief that the AI is intentionally attempting to mislead me away from the cascade. So ultimately, I believe that the AI does have insight as to what's coming next and I need to decide if I want to take the red pill gem, or the blue pill gem.
Of course, all of this is bereft of any sort of scientific method and based purely on my emotional opinion of the game AI being a Cheatyface.
Gormhaus said: I just played another match of the luckiest ai ever. The ai should be buying lottery tickets its so lucky. I wish there was an upload battle log function.
Ohboy said: Mirror match, I match something on a top corner instead of the suggested gem. AI doesn't take its own suggestion.
ChowDerHead said: Ohboy said: toastie said: Ohboy said: toastie said: I believe the suggested gem is the one that the AI would take It's not. I've tested this many times. Interesting. How did you test this? Mirror match, I match something on a top corner instead of the suggested gem. AI doesn't take its own suggestion. I've experienced quite the opposite, however, with a caveat. So ultimately, I believe that the AI does have insight as to what's coming next and I need to decide if I want to take the red pill gem, or the blue pill gem.
I've experienced quite the opposite, however, with a caveat. So ultimately, I believe that the AI does have insight as to what's coming next and I need to decide if I want to take the red pill gem, or the blue pill gem.