Leader board positions changing
Comments
-
There was a second bracket in Platinum.
Someone on Slack who didn't even own Tezz 2 joined at the end of the event and won Rishkar's Expertise.
0 -
Brigby said:@Greistal
This is something I've passed along to the developers already. I'm waiting for their response as to whether they have any insight into this occurrence.
Thank you... sorry for the screenshots, it's the first time I post on the new forum, maybe I should read carefully the new rules...
Greistal0 -
Actually, now that I think about it, I think I know another person who did this real late join snipe.shteev said:There was a second bracket in Platinum.
Someone on Slack who didn't even own Tezz 2 joined at the end of the event and won Rishkar's Expertise.0 -
If you're good and in for the reward at 265 (of which superklopp was first to post that score), then I'm definitely safe being the first to post 266 @ 05:19 EST.Greistal said:Same here... 28 minutes after the refreshing of the nodes I completed my games and I was 4th among those at 265 points (just before @madwren)...
Then, just a minute after, I dropped 1 position because NickBKK got added at the top position among 265ers.
Incidentally, @madwren lost 2 positions in the meanwhile because Ironer was inserted between us...
Now... I ended up 67th... I cannot be sure, but I think I could easily be in the top 50 if my 4th position among 265ers were conserved!
@Brigby , should I open a ticket for this (as I have also the screenshots as a proof), or is there some sort of answer from d3 to all the people that are in the same condition?
Greistal
//Removed Screenshot Displaying In-Game Player Names -Brigby0 -
At 266 points have you got Rishkar's Expertise, didn't you?PhoenixRisen said:
If you're good and in for the reward at 265 (of which superklopp was first to post that score), then I'm definitely safe being the first to post 266 @ 05:19 EST.Greistal said:Same here... 28 minutes after the refreshing of the nodes I completed my games and I was 4th among those at 265 points (just before @madwren)...
Then, just a minute after, I dropped 1 position because NickBKK got added at the top position among 265ers.
Incidentally, @madwren lost 2 positions in the meanwhile because Ironer was inserted between us...
Now... I ended up 67th... I cannot be sure, but I think I could easily be in the top 50 if my 4th position among 265ers were conserved!
@Brigby , should I open a ticket for this (as I have also the screenshots as a proof), or is there some sort of answer from d3 to all the people that are in the same condition?
Greistal
//Removed Screenshot Displaying In-Game Player Names -Brigby
0 -
@Brigby
I didn't know about the screenshot thing either. I hope I did it correctly by using links.
Regarding this catastrophe, it looks like there's two options: No one gets it (and the entire player base revolts) and the event is rerun OR every player to post 1 loss or better (score of 266+) receives the reward and the event is possibly rerun correctly next weekend. Otherwise, these devs will need to sort out final scoring per every account to the precise time each player posted his/her final score. I, and I think I would be speaking for the majority here, do not have much faith in the devs piecing together this puzzle of final score timing. Too many players; too many accounts; too many variables. Plus, they're busy with broken coalition rewards...still.
1 -
No, sir. I finished first of the 266 group, but was scored last among them. Think I scored 4 positions better than you? There were a plethora of others positioned ahead of me at 266.Greistal said:
At 266 points have you got Rishkar's Expertise, didn't you?PhoenixRisen said:
If you're good and in for the reward at 265 (of which superklopp was first to post that score), then I'm definitely safe being the first to post 266 @ 05:19 EST.Greistal said:Same here... 28 minutes after the refreshing of the nodes I completed my games and I was 4th among those at 265 points (just before @madwren)...
Then, just a minute after, I dropped 1 position because NickBKK got added at the top position among 265ers.
Incidentally, @madwren lost 2 positions in the meanwhile because Ironer was inserted between us...
Now... I ended up 67th... I cannot be sure, but I think I could easily be in the top 50 if my 4th position among 265ers were conserved!
@Brigby , should I open a ticket for this (as I have also the screenshots as a proof), or is there some sort of answer from d3 to all the people that are in the same condition?
Greistal
//Removed Screenshot Displaying In-Game Player Names -Brigby
//Removed In-Game Player Names -Brigby0 -
That might be a solution, except it still screws over people who would have gotten in at lower scores, or whose scores were ruined by what support calls "known issues".
I think a better solution, if they wanted to hand out more copies, was to simply extend it by one bracket (so 51-100 in plat and 26-50 in gold also gets it, for example) or to simply say that anyone matching the lowest score that was awarded a Rishkar's expertise would get it. I don't know in Plat, but in gold the 259 score reached from above rank 25 all the way down to around rank 50, maybe even past it.0 -
No, sir. I finished first of the 266 group, but was scored last among them. Think I scored 4 positions better than you? NickBKK was right behind me with Spadpl and superklopp. ShadowFlame, JackGunner, Nezumi, Arcannus, were among the plethora of those positioned ahead of me at 266.
So, I have no right to claim the reward, but I'm glad I did my post, as it may have helped you. I can send you the screenshots, should them be of any use for you!
Greistal0 -
From what I saw in my platinum bracket, 265 wasn't good enough - finished in the mid-60s and higher. My bracket needed 1 loss or better, which is obviously an issue given it's a matter of who posted first, the large number of players scoring 266, and the leaderboard bug has no logic to it.Thuran said:That might be a solution, except it still screws over people who would have gotten in at lower scores, or whose scores were ruined by what support calls "known issues".
I think a better solution, if they wanted to hand out more copies, was to simply extend it by one bracket (so 51-100 in plat and 26-50 in gold also gets it, for example) or to simply say that anyone matching the lowest score that was awarded a Rishkar's expertise would get it. I don't know in Plat, but in gold the 259 score reached from above rank 25 all the way down to around rank 50, maybe even past it.0 -
Thank you. Should I need further evidence, I might take you up on this offer. I'm sorry you seemingly missed by a single point. Not very hopeful, but maybe it does get rerun.Greistal said:No, sir. I finished first of the 266 group, but was scored last among them. Think I scored 4 positions better than you? NickBKK was right behind me with Spadpl and superklopp. ShadowFlame, JackGunner, Nezumi, Arcannus, were among the plethora of those positioned ahead of me at 266.
So, I have no right to claim the reward, but I'm glad I did my post, as it may have helped you. I can send you the screenshots, should them be of any use for you!
Greistal0 -
@PhoenixRisen @Greistal
No worries! I understand you two are new to the forum, so no harm done. Just please make sure to read through all the forum rules when you get the chance.
When it comes to the screenshots, the issue has more to do with displaying other player's in-game names, rather than the usage of a screenshot itself. You are perfectly allowed to use screenshots if it does not reveal anyone's name.
As a general comment to everyone, the development team has been investigating and working on some changes to Matchmaking that should help alleviate current player concerns, and that includes leaderboard rankings.(Although I currently don't have any information on how rankings will be addressed in the future)0 -
Are there any plans to address how that messed up this event?Brigby said:
As a general comment to everyone, the development team has been investigating and working on some changes to Matchmaking that should help alleviate current player concerns, and that includes leaderboard rankings.(Although I currently don't have any information on how rankings will be addressed in the future)0 -
I have one better - I finished 50th in platinum and DIDN'T get Rishar's Expertise. My position dropped like others but my final rank at the end of the event was 50 but I got the 51-100 rewards .....
Mike0 -
Terribly sorry. I remember falling to 50th and my positioning was scored 51-100 for whatever reason. Pre-update, it counted our rank a position ahead (+1) in the events screen, now post-update, it's scoring us a position behind our rank (-1). Good God, each update comes with more bugs than the previous version.Soybomb said:I have one better - I finished 50th in platinum and DIDN'T get Rishar's Expertise. My position dropped like others but my final rank at the end of the event was 50 but I got the 51-100 rewards .....
Mike0 -
and again:Brigby said:@PhoenixRisen @Greistal
No worries! I understand you two are new to the forum, so no harm done. Just please make sure to read through all the forum rules when you get the chance.
When it comes to the screenshots, the issue has more to do with displaying other player's in-game names, rather than the usage of a screenshot itself. You are perfectly allowed to use screenshots if it does not reveal anyone's name.
As a general comment to everyone, the development team has been investigating and working on some changes to Matchmaking that should help alleviate current player concerns, and that includes leaderboard rankings.(Although I currently don't have any information on how rankings will be addressed in the future)
A vital information on page 5 of a thread..maybe it'd make sence to pin an announcement at the top of the forum with answers regarding current questions ( like this one ) - the same way you're doing in the bug forum?
I'd love that feature.
Also: the Matchmaking directly impacts/will directly impact the leaderboard rankings? Did I misunderstood that one?1 -
While not speaking for myself (I finished a glorious 592nd), I'm thinking the anticipation of positive future changes to matchmaking and ranking won't do much to alleviate players' current concerns, in particular with respect to this event.Brigby said:@PhoenixRisen @Greistal
As a general comment to everyone, the development team has been investigating and working on some changes to Matchmaking that should help alleviate current player concerns, and that includes leaderboard rankings.(Although I currently don't have any information on how rankings will be addressed in the future)
1 -
I wanted to chime in on this thread that I also got 266. I was with @PhoenixRisen in being in the top 50. Then I saw him get bumped out. Then I have no idea what happened to me. I was 46th when a few minutes left, assume I maybe got to 50 before the event ended, bu ended up with a blank rewards screen and did not get the mythic.
I have to agree with him on this one. Based on how the event went down with tie breaks, the best approach for compensation is that everyone that scored 266+ should receive the mythic. It's clear there were more than 50 people with that score, but I don't see another fair way to fix this.0 -
Just a quick note to inform @Brigby that the same problem is happening in other events as well.
In Emergency Ordinance I was the first to post a 146 points score. I've checked now and I'm last of the group... I'm 42nd right but there is a lot of people before me at 146...
Sorry to bother you again, with a low score and worse rewards by respect to Rishkar's Expertise... but every reward counts!
Thank you and bye,
Greistal0
Categories
- All Categories
- 45.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.6K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.8K MPQ General Discussion
- 6.5K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2.1K MPQ Character Discussion
- 186 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.4K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 14.1K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 538 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.6K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 454 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 316 MtGPQ Events
- 68 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.8K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 550 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 7 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 471 Other Games
- 179 General Discussion
- 292 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements




