Spoit wrote: gamar wrote: I'm all for one or two new 2* chars. But even a lazy 2* character still needs its numbers tweaked so it fits in with the power level of other 2* chars. D3 had a few options here that don't take the time of a "full new character": 1) Make Moonstone or Bullseye actually playable 2) Make a 2* Falcon, or BP, or PSylocke 3) Make a R/G 2* who won't ever be used because he's outclassed by Thor and Ares What's annoying people is: "Lazy characters are less effort" doesn't justify why they chose option 3! A 2* falcon would be interesting. Might make bullseye and not-laken actually viable...ish
gamar wrote: I'm all for one or two new 2* chars. But even a lazy 2* character still needs its numbers tweaked so it fits in with the power level of other 2* chars. D3 had a few options here that don't take the time of a "full new character": 1) Make Moonstone or Bullseye actually playable 2) Make a 2* Falcon, or BP, or PSylocke 3) Make a R/G 2* who won't ever be used because he's outclassed by Thor and Ares What's annoying people is: "Lazy characters are less effort" doesn't justify why they chose option 3!
Natsu-dragneel612 wrote: This is why i think they should have had the 3* human torch for the topprize and the 2* one as the lower prize.
RockMonster wrote: theHappyDance wrote: This wasn't exactly what I meant when I said they should try to balance character gender ratios better... On a more serious note, if they want to keep introducing all these lazy versions of characters, they really ought to change required nodes to requiring distinct characters rather than requiring a specific version of a character. Granted the extent of my playing since TH went live was about 30 min yesterday, but nothing's more annoying than seeing a Cap node in PvE that you end up skipping because it requires the useless 2* version and won't let you use lazy cap. Actually, since I've shifted to playing a lot more casually (if at all), maybe this is a good time for me to delete all my useless 2* versions of stronger 3* heroes to make roster space. That's such a pet-peeve of mine. Lazy versions are the same character, no extra work went in to their development, so don't put it on us to put extra work in to collecting both.
theHappyDance wrote: This wasn't exactly what I meant when I said they should try to balance character gender ratios better... On a more serious note, if they want to keep introducing all these lazy versions of characters, they really ought to change required nodes to requiring distinct characters rather than requiring a specific version of a character. Granted the extent of my playing since TH went live was about 30 min yesterday, but nothing's more annoying than seeing a Cap node in PvE that you end up skipping because it requires the useless 2* version and won't let you use lazy cap. Actually, since I've shifted to playing a lot more casually (if at all), maybe this is a good time for me to delete all my useless 2* versions of stronger 3* heroes to make roster space.
Arogntbastrd wrote: I don't see what all the fuss is about. If you're in 3 star land you're not going to use 2* torch or any other new 2*. Hell, you don't even use 3* torch if your roster is legit. If you're in 2* land he'll be good. What's the problem?
gamar wrote: Once again, because of rubberbanding any snapshot taken during an event at any time but the last half hour tells you exactly jack and squat about how well people are placing, and snapshots taken in the first 3/4 of the event before scaling has really ramped up tell you even less
CornerPocket wrote: Does anyone think they actually have limitations on the characters they can use from marvel. It would explain the sudden surge of lazy characters. I don't mind torch too much. Everyone mentions they would like a break from needing to do every event: here is your break. Everyone will get this torch eventually through pvp wins and recruit tokens if he has similar percentages to other 2 stars