Prevalence of MThor and could she be the target of a rebalance?
Comments
-
@bbigler said:
It seems like 99% of the posts on this forum come from the same 10 people.Yeah, I think a lot use Line/Discord to communicate but I find it much harder to follow conversations as there are no "Topic Threads" like there are here.
0 -
@Bowgentle said:
@entrailbucket said:
@KGB I absolutely sympathize with you here and I totally understand what you're saying.The fun, competitive multiplayer game that is MPQ PvP is completely by accident and has nothing at all to do with the game the devs were attempting to build. I don't believe they even anticipated its existence, and I certainly don't think they could ever have created such a fun game on purpose.
They used to talk about making an alliance war mode -- the problem with that is that there's a 0% chance that the official alliance war mode would be anywhere near as fun as the one we created for ourselves. In fact, we'd probably just repurpose their alliance war mode into something more fun.
The fun here is all hidden behind 10 years of shorthand in chats, tactics, social norms, and grudges. It only exists because the MPQ devs managed to accidentally create the perfect platform for it, but none of that is documented or explained anywhere official, nor could it be.
Nobody holds grudges like an MPQ player.
We'd all have quit 9 years ago without LINE.So much Truth.
1 -
I think my issue is just bad faith takes. Nerf. Don’t nerf. Who cares? Just be consistent. Daz, that was a sweet apology. I’m not as nice as you are. Is your popcorn refilled? If not do it now.
There is no wall of Thor guys…
@entrailbucket said:
I find the whole discussion kind of weird. Let's remove Thor from the equation -- I don't see her being used excessively at the moment.-
@entrailbucket said:
I'm not seeing a wall of Thors, at least not right now.Except there actually IS a wall of Thor (that changed quick)
@entrailbucket said:
95% of the teams I saw today were Thor teams. You are not in a minority among the higher-end players, at all. Everyone is only using her. Nobody is coming up either unique teams -- that's the entire point of this!-
@entrailbucket said:
That there's no diversity in the PvP metagame, AGAIN.We went directly from a wall of Chasm/Hulk to a wall of Thor/Shang-Chi. That despite rotating +100 level boosts that create tons more viable options, people prefer to use the same two characters, and refuse to even try anything else. That new characters, and buffed characters, will have no impact on the metagame and will never get looked at or even tried.
She is apparently the same as Chasm…
@entrailbucket said:
Sounds exactly like what Chasm's defenders said...But he also recognizes that there are clear differences…
@entrailbucket said:
Thor is good, and she's better than everyone else, but if you're using her for everything all the time you're at a pretty major disadvantage. It's not like Chasm where at 550 he could trivially stomp 672 boosted guys, and 672 boosted guys had trouble beating him.In a boosted metagame, unboosted Thor is a speed bump. I can boost match damage and kill her in like 2 moves. Yes, she has a chance of going off, and yes, sometimes players can beat me with her, but usually not.
Chasm was actually a problem in a boosted metagame -- relying on him to do everything for you was optimal because he was as good or better than boosted guys. Going all in on Chasm was a ticket to winning everything forever. Going all in on Thor is...not.
Thor is not a problem, guys! She’s not the best option in a given week…
-
@entrailbucket said:
-boosted Kingpin is straight up just faster than Thor. I can oneshot her easily with blue boosts. His green shreds and his black will slow her to a crawl.-
@entrailbucket said:
-Boosted Kingpin is faster than Thor. I did over 100 matches in less than 2 hours yesterday, against Thor teams, using KP/1* Spidey. I have 550 Shang-Chi and Thor and wouldn't be able to do anywhere near that number with the unboosted team.-
@entrailbucket said:
I have Thor at 550 too, and the boosted characters are significantly stronger and better overall than she is, at much lower unboosted levels.But, she actually is the best option?
@entrailbucket said:
So Thor is the fastest, strongest and best character by a mile -- in fact, she's so good that you have no desire or incentive to ever use any other character on your roster, even if they've been buffed and boosted above her level.
See this, devs? Do you think that's an ok state for the game to be in? Do you think you'll be able to sell any other character while Thor is like-
@entrailbucket said:
She's the best damage character, a strong AP generator, the best anti special tile character, the best cascade generator...I don't even know what else.One of my personal favorites… a team with Shang-Chi requires no thought and is autoplay?
@entrailbucket said:
Maybe people like Thor (and particularly Thor/Shang-Chi) because the game just plays itself while you watch?Autopilot teams certainly can have a place, but they should never be more effective than teams you actually have to play.
But requires a ton of skill??
@entrailbucket said:
Shang-Chi is well known to be both slow and horrifically bad on defense, because he requires so much player skill. I have him at 550 too. He'd be much worse and much slower without Thor causing free cascades and charging tiles every turn.And apparently it’s okay to say Shang isn’t a problem because he’s horrifically bad at defense (above), but other players can’t say the same about Thor (below)…
@entrailbucket said:
So a character cannot ever be overpowered on offense? Only a defensive character can be overpowered? That's an... interesting take!There is confusion as to why people think he wants them to play the game like Just like him…
@entrailbucket said:
I still don't understand why you keep saying I want people to play the game like me, or how that invalidates everything I say.-
@entrailbucket said:
I don't think there's really any value in continuing this conversation, at this point. If the impression I'm giving is that I feel like other players are playing the game "wrong," that couldn't be further from the truth.Maybe because he is literally telling people to play, build their roster and enjoy the game the way he does??
@entrailbucket said:
And yes, it's absolutely hilarious when they take away players' overpowered toys. A bunch of people just quit! It's awesome! Don't go all in, have a backup plan, don't depend on just one or two guys.-
@entrailbucket said:
@Bad said:
Yeah you can play pvp how you like. As long as:- you don't care about getting hit
- you are playing for wins, or else you have a high developed roster which allows you to play the best meta teams and still gaining points
- you have a lot of time or you want to spend more time than the optimal teams
- you don't care about health packs not playing characters regenerating or again your roster allows you to play multiple teams.
So in other words being a part of the 3% minority.
OR, and this is completely insane, you could just have fun playing matches with different characters and not worry about rewards or time or anything else.
finally he gets defensive when people repeatedly point out how he lumps players together like Hound
@entrailbucket said:
Ah, this again. Sorry, I'll replace every instance of "MPQ players" with "some MPQ players," to make sure everything i ever say is absolutely semantically correct. There's no way you could possibly have assumed I wasn't talking about literally every single player there.Instead of taking ownership for comments like these lol
@entrailbucket said:
Nobody here plays or has played any other competitive multiplayer game, ever.-
@entrailbucket said:
Everyone is only using her. Nobody is coming up either unique teams -- that's the entire point of this!(Our bad for assuming you weren’t referring to all players. I don’t know how that could be confusing).
And before I’m accused of having no life, clearly someone who writes a character guide longer than his doctoral dissertation for the 10 people on the forums has way too much time on his hands
To be honest this isn’t even a thread about nerfing Thor. It’s a thread about EB wanting the game to be something it isn’t and wanting the devs to fix the fact that people don’t play/enjoy that game the same way he does. This is why the goal posts shift and the arguments are clearly inconsistent. Good luck with the crusade! And while the arguments are clearly different than our departed forumite, the style of argument is straight from the book of canine silhouettes.
11 -
@entrailbucket said:
The fun, competitive multiplayer game that is MPQ PvP is completely by accident and has nothing at all to do with the game the devs were attempting to build. I don't believe they even anticipated its existence, and I certainly don't think they could ever have created such a fun game on purpose.
They used to talk about making an alliance war mode -- the problem with that is that there's a 0% chance that the official alliance war mode would be anywhere near as fun as the one we created for ourselves. In fact, we'd probably just repurpose their alliance war mode into something more fun.
The fun here is all hidden behind 10 years of shorthand in chats, tactics, social norms, and grudges. It only exists because the MPQ devs managed to accidentally create the perfect platform for it, but none of that is documented or explained anywhere official, nor could it be.
It's funny how often you go on about this glorious secret PVP game because it's largely gone extinct; You're making arguments in favor of an "extra" part of the game that very few are still playing.
I'm going to have to run some fuzzy numbers but we can estimate that at least 40k players are interacting with seasonal PVP play to some extent, 15~ of these at the highest tier (info taken from recorded bracket flips).
Of those 40k+ there are at most 1k unique players amongst all the various pvp slice rooms and the majority of them are there because working together in that way is a reliable method to generate a lot of points.
Of those 1k, how many are actually taking part in the dump/snipe/grudge behavior you relish in? I'm in an alliance family of over 200 active players(I know). Of those 200, I can name like 6 whole people that actually go hard on hunting specific players or alliances.
If we're the 1% you're speaking for an even smaller subset of subsets.
0 -
@Timemachinego said:
@entrailbucket said:
The fun, competitive multiplayer game that is MPQ PvP is completely by accident and has nothing at all to do with the game the devs were attempting to build. I don't believe they even anticipated its existence, and I certainly don't think they could ever have created such a fun game on purpose.
They used to talk about making an alliance war mode -- the problem with that is that there's a 0% chance that the official alliance war mode would be anywhere near as fun as the one we created for ourselves. In fact, we'd probably just repurpose their alliance war mode into something more fun.
The fun here is all hidden behind 10 years of shorthand in chats, tactics, social norms, and grudges. It only exists because the MPQ devs managed to accidentally create the perfect platform for it, but none of that is documented or explained anywhere official, nor could it be.
It's funny how often you go on about this glorious secret PVP game because it's largely gone extinct; You're making arguments in favor of an "extra" part of the game that very few are still playing.
I'm going to have to run some fuzzy numbers but we can estimate that at least 40k players are interacting with seasonal PVP play to some extent, 15~ of these at the highest tier (info taken from recorded bracket flips).
Of those 40k+ there are at most 1k unique players amongst all the various pvp slice rooms and the majority of them are there because working together in that way is a reliable method to generate a lot of points.
Of those 1k, how many are actually taking part in the dump/snipe/grudge behavior you relish in? I'm in an alliance family of over 200 active players(I know). Of those 200, I can name like 6 whole people that actually go hard on hunting specific players or alliances.
If we're the 1% you're speaking for an even smaller subset of subsets.
I mean 6 out of 200 is 3%. I'd agree that it's probably not 3% overall but to say it's largely extinct is a weird thing to say.
1 -
This thread is a split conversation because of many players having big problems with her. She was totally OP, her cascades deadly.
Probably I could post screenshots like this one and the previous one every day I find a maxed Mthor. And make videos severely beating up Mthor teams.
And like I already said, no, there isn't a gacha game having a really hard to build 5*s mechanic where they nerfed an easy to beat character just because they are popular.0 -
@Bad said:
This thread is a split conversation because of many players having big problems with her. She was totally OP, her cascades deadly.
Probably I could post screenshots like this one and the previous one every day I find a maxed Mthor. And make videos severely beating up Mthor teams.
And like I already said, no, there isn't a gacha game having a really hard to build 5*s mechanic where they nerfed an easy to beat character just because they are popular.You realize using a lower level Shang Jane to beat a maxed one isn't really helping you to convince people that she's not OP?
2 -
@Bowgentle said:
You realize using a lower level Shang Jane to beat a maxed one isn't really helping you to convince people that she's not OP?
There is the another screenshot using kingpin and Omega, if it's for to convince people.
Actually what people should take from that screenshot is the damage that a maxed Mthor did to me.
The supposed struggle I had to endure.
And I could beat Mthor with just any other good team.0 -
I couldn't find any maxed Mthor in SIM right now, sorry about that.
But it's possible to see what awful damage did to my team (sarcasm on).0 -
@Daredevil217
I’m not going to quote your post about EB as we’d be here forever scrolling, but just to say I love you and that’s a masterpiece of contradiction. 👍
Well put Sir!3 -
@Pantera236 said:
I mean 6 out of 200 is 3%. I'd agree that it's probably not 3% overall but to say it's largely extinct is a weird thing to say.
Fair, but we're also arguably the top alliance in the game. It's kind of an arms race scenario, every competitive alliance family tries to keep a few of these maniacs around so that they can threaten mutual destruction if anyone goes too hard in a particular direction.
My main (poorly articulated) point was that EB is in favor of a game that very few people are actually participating in; it's amazing that he's taken his inability to understand general consensus and stretch it into a 20+ page thread.
0 -
@DAZ0273 said:
Early MPQ is pretty hilarious in some ways to me with all the nonsense. Like that Spaceship guy and his "legal counsel" who rocked up on the boards at some point. Didn't they try and demand the Devs accept them buying breakfast or something?!?! Bonkers. They had delicious levels of delusional importance, I loved it! I miss those sort of lunatics. I guess it is sort of why I like Entrail so much with his tales of players laying siege to the developers HQ instead of them pretty much being 89% spreadsheet nerds. I regret in some ways not being able to get into the whole Line petty bollocks but at the same time maybe not, lol.
Wow, the catering lunch joke I made 5+ years ago still lives on. NICE!!!!
1 -
@Daredevil217 take all my Likes and Insightfuls. You sir just won the forums.
1 -
@Daredevil217 great job! You cut n pasted like 30 lines, completely out of context, from what, 100 different posts, over how many days, to assemble the argument you wanted, which is what, exactly? That I contradicted myself? Whatever I've been saying seems to have gotten the point across, if you'd spend more time dissecting every line of my every post than you do playing MPQ.
So yes, I think it's pretty weird that "the way people want to play the game," according to you, is to not play the game part of the game. How am I trying to take away someone's fun when players in this thread are saying the game is already no fun and they want to minimize their time spent playing it?
If I want the game to be something it's not, what is that thing? You keep saying that and I don't understand what you think I want. What do YOU want it to be? Why are those things incompatible?
0 -
I never found the Puzzle Warrior > @The rockett said:
@DAZ0273 said:
Early MPQ is pretty hilarious in some ways to me with all the nonsense. Like that Spaceship guy and his "legal counsel" who rocked up on the boards at some point. Didn't they try and demand the Devs accept them buying breakfast or something?!?! Bonkers. They had delicious levels of delusional importance, I loved it! I miss those sort of lunatics. I guess it is sort of why I like Entrail so much with his tales of players laying siege to the developers HQ instead of them pretty much being 89% spreadsheet nerds. I regret in some ways not being able to get into the whole Line petty bollocks but at the same time maybe not, lol.
Wow, the catering lunch joke I made 5+ years ago still lives on. NICE!!!!
Oh that was you? Sorry 'bout that, lol!
0 -
@DAZ0273 said:
I never found the Puzzle Warrior > @The rockett said:@DAZ0273 said:
Oh that was you? Sorry 'bout that, lol!
Yea the joke was about I wonder if I would cater a lunch to their office if we could get some communication from them. Funny enough, I made that joke and it got a response.
0 -
@The rockett said:
@DAZ0273 said:
I never found the Puzzle Warrior > @The rockett said:@DAZ0273 said:
Oh that was you? Sorry 'bout that, lol!
Yea the joke was about I wonder if I would cater a lunch to their office if we could get some communication from them. Funny enough, I made that joke and it got a response.
No worries - I mis-remembered.
0 -
I could post screenshots everyday of MThor battles gone badly - where she gets crazy cascades and AP and hurts my team in just a few turns. Colossus makes her manageable and I would rather fight her than boosted 5-stars. So I’m not justified in calling for a nerf even though her battles look unfair.
In comparison to Shang, she hits above her weight (but not as much as Shang) but she has better defense than Shang too. Put them together and you have a team that can hit way above their level and has some PVP deterrence. But since PVP is a game of picking the lesser of 2 evils, MThor teams get hit a lot.
So now that I’m retracting my original statement to nerf MThor (which started this mess) can this thread die now?
1 -
I think this stopped being about Thor a long time ago (witness the many, many contradictory statements about what she is/does from the same players, including me) and started being about philosophy and what players want the game to be. I actually find all that way more interesting than "is character x bad for the game?" because "bad for the game" will have different meanings to everyone, and it's those ideas that are more fun to talk about.
0 -
@bbigler said:
I could post screenshots everyday of MThor battles gone badly - where she gets crazy cascades and AP and hurts my team in just a few turns.Post them. Maybe you could get more advice.
My screenshot in SIM wasn't my best battle. Bad board, I couldn't match her initial chargeds, she got some lucky cascades.
Also riri isn't the best choice, you can only use her green until Mthor is out (I played her thinking hopefully no one will find more excuses). And still that's all she could hurt me.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements