Upcoming 5-Star (11/17 release): No 3-Star Version
Comments
-
I as fan definitely voted for Night Nurse lol; I assumed Eternals as then-current Marvel Tentpole got us BK first
0 -
@DAZ0273 said:
Maybe we should ask Fight if we have to keep tip-toeing around this subject?@fight4thedream - An unreleased 4* character showed up in peoples non-rostered lists in the game presumably as a mistake/glitch - if forum members refer to this character would it be considered a breach of Forum rules in the circumstances? Thanks.
Edit: OK so I see in another thread that this has sort of been answered and it appears OK as long as we use the spoiler function.
I appreciate you checking.
In this case, when there is an in-game error revealing a future character or event, we don't treat such information as data-mined information. We do ask that you be considerate and use the spoiler tag function for those that may not have noticed the error but that's just a matter of courtesy so normally we won't issue a warning.
With that said, we do reserve the right to remove content when deemed necessary and if a user goes about it in a rude or obnoxious way that would be grounds for a warning (see rules 7 and 8).
Hope that clears things up! Also, please keep in mind we have a new dev team and new Forum Administrator so there's a possibility the current policy may change.
2 -
[redacted].
This game requires a serious reengineering of the game progresssion. planned times for char turn over, full coverage and absolution times (accounting min-max on acceptable levels for planned sales and pve-pvp placement success etc.). diminishing returns instead of increasing returns as well as planned aging ... and doing all that without losing already over commited-overhyped player base.
Mod note: Removed inappropriate comment. - fight4thedream
-1 -
@Bergen said:
This game requires a serious reengineering of the game progresssion. planned times for char turn over, full coverage and absolution times (accounting min-max on acceptable levels for planned sales and pve-pvp placement success etc.). diminishing returns instead of increasing returns as well as planned aging ... and doing all that without losing already over commited-overhyped player base.
Nah it doesn't need any of that. It's fine
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements