entrailbucket said: 1. Okoye2. Hulk....(Tied for last). Everyone else.You can spend a bunch of time and write a bunch of words, argue and split hairs over the relative rankings of the bottom tier, but ultimately, in a game where most of the time you only get to pick two, doing a full set of rankings is a purely theoretical exercise.
CharlieCroker said: entrailbucket said: 1. Okoye2. Hulk....(Tied for last). Everyone else.You can spend a bunch of time and write a bunch of words, argue and split hairs over the relative rankings of the bottom tier, but ultimately, in a game where most of the time you only get to pick two, doing a full set of rankings is a purely theoretical exercise. Personally think you’re underrating Apocalypse. I’d rather hit (try hitting at least) a 550 Okoye/Hulk than a 550 Apoc. 3 actives, all cheap and potentially game ending. Combined with a crazy high health pool.
entrailbucket said: 1. Okoye2. Hulk....(Tied for last). Everyone else.
Sekilicious said: entrailbucket said: 1. Okoye2. Hulk....(Tied for last). Everyone else. I have never understood applying the Ricky Bobby mentality to a game, or any other aspect of life for that matter. Especially to the point where it needs to be reiterated every time a character discussion comes up. We obviously get it, you only play with two characters. Some will agree, most understand that it is more nuanced than this severely reductionist philosophy.