Scaling Tied To S.H.I.E.L.D. Clearance Levels (5/25/17)
Comments
-
To clarify, I could not care less about placement rewards. I'm referring only to progression. This game is not a competition for me. It is a 3 match favorite related to one of my all time favorite interests, Marvel Comics. I love to play every day and gain more characters and levels. I very rarely do any pvp,so Why do my opinions offend or upset? Obviously my interests are somewhat selfish, but why wouldn't you want everyone to progress as quickly as possible? I feel like this animosity would be completely reduced with the abolition of the placement portion of pve. I so wish it were strictly "story mode". These discussions would be so much more agreeable.
-JaGo0 -
New McG said:zodiac339 said:
Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
I don't believe in soft capping and have never utilized it as a strategy. Why the heck do you think I have access to SCL8??? I level when possible excluding 5 stars but only because they are so under covered. I roster every new character I'm lucky enough to pull/earn and level them when ISO is available.
0 -
I loved the test, and I hope they do it again soon!!!!!! I can't stand my current PVE scaling at SCL 8... the test version was much easier and more fair! Especially in levels with the dreaded Muscles!!!0
-
Nepenthe said:New McG said:zodiac339 said:
This scaling change is finally adding the idea of making progress back into PvE. Collect more covers, level your roster, and then you can step up to the next CL.0 -
GrumpySmurf1002 said:ZootSax said:I really like this idea quite a bit. If they opened up SCL9 and had something like two 4*'s in the progression to make it demonstrably better than SCL8 and implemented the "heroic" system similar to what you described, I feel like it would be a solid improvement across the board.
Thing to keep in mind is that the 5* players are also fairly well loaded in 4s, some boasting ones lvl 340+. They won't have a problem dropping to 7 and using those characters (heck, they might welcome the change of pace).
From players perspective, this is ultimately a "how do i get the most rewards for the least amount of time." Devs need to keep that in mind as they set their scaling/rewards, because 1000iso isn't gonna be enough incentive to get someone to play an extra (up to) 2 hours a day.0 -
zodiac339 said:Fightmastermpq said:JaGo said:Personally, I like the system as is. During the experiment my 2 star essential went from 80ish levels at the start to the 140's for SCL 7 Really?? That's just the easiest comparison I could think of. The others were just bonkers and it's the first time since SCL's were introduced that I didn't just automatically join SCL 8. And honestly, my roster did not start accelerating until 4 clears in PVE awarded a total of 25 CP. it was abyssmally slow until they made that change. Now that it takes 5 clears( right? ) to max out progression for an event it slowed down again for me considerably . That combined with these huge jumps in "starting" levels caused me to just quit the event altogether. That's a first for me as well. It was exhausting and chewed through health packs like sand storm through paper mache.
I understand the plight of the players with many champed 4 stars and 5's, but making it harder for the rest of us isn't the answer either.
I wish I had a great suggestion that was fair to all of us, but I don't. I simply wanted to state my point of view.
The 4 clear system and previous SCL 8 awards were perfect for me and I really want them back. It fit my busy schedule and accelerated my roster.
Regards,
-JaGo
Let us make a comparison here to PVP. Now, you might say a person does not deserve the top rewards from PVP without having the biggest roster, and in the case of PVP, this ends up being the case. And without the biggest roster, even the top progression reward is unattainable, as beyond a certain number of points, there is no way to really progress as points are lost due to attacks. There becomes a progression plateau at various levels of roster strength. A 4 star roster may rarely get to 1200, but will probably not. A 3 star roster might get 900 by some miracle. A 2 star roster should probably hit 300 and call it a day. Would your suggestion be to, "Drop down until you can deal with the difficulty and progress from there?" No. PVP is an area of the game where, regardless of the SCL, players are denied rewards they "deserve" in order to progress because the plateau of points is the same.
Players need to be able to play in the SCL they have access to, PVP or PVE. To say they shouldn't be there due to the strength of the roster is massively and inexcusably arrogant. Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
It's not unfair that a SCL8 player before that couldn't compete in the SCL8 test had rewards taken from them. It was unfair that they were ever getting those rewards in the first place. Be thankful you had them for so long, and pray that this test period moves at a snails pace. I'll do the opposite.6 -
Mega rewards was not my term but people in CL8 wanting more. Some boost in rewards is fine but if CL 8 & 9 start handing out major progression rewards with an improve the in other clearance levels those in CL 5 & 6 will never be able to move up in pve or pvp.0
-
People that say dropping down from SCL8 will stop their progress are talking absolute nonsense. The difference between SCL8 and SCL7 are a small amount of ISO, HP, a few CP and one 3* cover. I know cause I dropped from 8 to 7 for that event. People that think thats going to end their progress are just exaggerating to try and stop the change as it will end their easy ride in SCL8.5
-
Bottom line is rank 52 (47 for the test event) to 125 is too wide a range to share identical scaling.5
-
nick_chicane said:People that say dropping down from SCL8 will stop their progress are talking absolute nonsense. The difference between SCL8 and SCL7 are a small amount of ISO, HP, a few CP and one 3* cover. I know cause I dropped from 8 to 7 for that event. People that think thats going to end their progress are just exaggerating to try and stop the change as it will end their easy ride in SCL8.
That's progression rewards. So, apart from what you have listed, there is also what one will be missing from placement.
T1 in scl7 is what? 3 4* covers
T2-5 2 4*
T6-10 just 1 4*.
Now, placement rewards in scl8 are not that more generous (1 extra cover throughout t1-10) and some extra iso and tokens I think. They are however better for the transitioner rather than the person who is already there.
If you rely on progression rewards to further your roster you are indeed taking the long way around. You'll get there eventually and it will be easier in scl7, sure. Scl8 however is better for those who are transitioning and their goal is placement.
If the rewards stay as they are, scl8 is the pure 4* transitioner place IMHO and 5* rosters reaaaaaallly need 9 and 101 -
fmftint said:Bottom line is rank 52 (47 for the test event) to 125 is too wide a range to share identical scaling.0
-
Keep the current scaling as it is right now.
I'm more than happy to keep "stealing" 1st places with my 3* roster from those more "deserving" 5* players.
TIL the placement rewards are about deserving0 -
Fightmastermpq said:zodiac339 said:Fightmastermpq said:JaGo said:Personally, I like the system as is. During the experiment my 2 star essential went from 80ish levels at the start to the 140's for SCL 7 Really?? That's just the easiest comparison I could think of. The others were just bonkers and it's the first time since SCL's were introduced that I didn't just automatically join SCL 8. And honestly, my roster did not start accelerating until 4 clears in PVE awarded a total of 25 CP. it was abyssmally slow until they made that change. Now that it takes 5 clears( right? ) to max out progression for an event it slowed down again for me considerably . That combined with these huge jumps in "starting" levels caused me to just quit the event altogether. That's a first for me as well. It was exhausting and chewed through health packs like sand storm through paper mache.
I understand the plight of the players with many champed 4 stars and 5's, but making it harder for the rest of us isn't the answer either.
I wish I had a great suggestion that was fair to all of us, but I don't. I simply wanted to state my point of view.
The 4 clear system and previous SCL 8 awards were perfect for me and I really want them back. It fit my busy schedule and accelerated my roster.
Regards,
-JaGo
Let us make a comparison here to PVP. Now, you might say a person does not deserve the top rewards from PVP without having the biggest roster, and in the case of PVP, this ends up being the case. And without the biggest roster, even the top progression reward is unattainable, as beyond a certain number of points, there is no way to really progress as points are lost due to attacks. There becomes a progression plateau at various levels of roster strength. A 4 star roster may rarely get to 1200, but will probably not. A 3 star roster might get 900 by some miracle. A 2 star roster should probably hit 300 and call it a day. Would your suggestion be to, "Drop down until you can deal with the difficulty and progress from there?" No. PVP is an area of the game where, regardless of the SCL, players are denied rewards they "deserve" in order to progress because the plateau of points is the same.
Players need to be able to play in the SCL they have access to, PVP or PVE. To say they shouldn't be there due to the strength of the roster is massively and inexcusably arrogant. Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
It's not unfair that a SCL8 player before that couldn't compete in the SCL8 test had rewards taken from them. It was unfair that they were ever getting those rewards in the first place. Be thankful you had them for so long, and pray that this test period moves at a snails pace. I'll do the opposite.3 -
sirwookieechris said:Fightmastermpq said:zodiac339 said:Fightmastermpq said:JaGo said:Personally, I like the system as is. During the experiment my 2 star essential went from 80ish levels at the start to the 140's for SCL 7 Really?? That's just the easiest comparison I could think of. The others were just bonkers and it's the first time since SCL's were introduced that I didn't just automatically join SCL 8. And honestly, my roster did not start accelerating until 4 clears in PVE awarded a total of 25 CP. it was abyssmally slow until they made that change. Now that it takes 5 clears( right? ) to max out progression for an event it slowed down again for me considerably . That combined with these huge jumps in "starting" levels caused me to just quit the event altogether. That's a first for me as well. It was exhausting and chewed through health packs like sand storm through paper mache.
I understand the plight of the players with many champed 4 stars and 5's, but making it harder for the rest of us isn't the answer either.
I wish I had a great suggestion that was fair to all of us, but I don't. I simply wanted to state my point of view.
The 4 clear system and previous SCL 8 awards were perfect for me and I really want them back. It fit my busy schedule and accelerated my roster.
Regards,
-JaGo
Let us make a comparison here to PVP. Now, you might say a person does not deserve the top rewards from PVP without having the biggest roster, and in the case of PVP, this ends up being the case. And without the biggest roster, even the top progression reward is unattainable, as beyond a certain number of points, there is no way to really progress as points are lost due to attacks. There becomes a progression plateau at various levels of roster strength. A 4 star roster may rarely get to 1200, but will probably not. A 3 star roster might get 900 by some miracle. A 2 star roster should probably hit 300 and call it a day. Would your suggestion be to, "Drop down until you can deal with the difficulty and progress from there?" No. PVP is an area of the game where, regardless of the SCL, players are denied rewards they "deserve" in order to progress because the plateau of points is the same.
Players need to be able to play in the SCL they have access to, PVP or PVE. To say they shouldn't be there due to the strength of the roster is massively and inexcusably arrogant. Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
It's not unfair that a SCL8 player before that couldn't compete in the SCL8 test had rewards taken from them. It was unfair that they were ever getting those rewards in the first place. Be thankful you had them for so long, and pray that this test period moves at a snails pace. I'll do the opposite.1 -
Just do something, my roster as it is now is stuck in limbo. If you create max and mins based on CL then you can work up to a point where you can stay in a CL but have an easy time with it. If you level up right at the moment you will just increase the difficulty for the most part. Do something!
0 -
@Brigby any idea when we will hear an update about future tests or implementation of a permanent change?0
-
How about this: Scaling is tied to clearance level, everyone can choose any clearance level they want, BUT you can only earn placement from your highest available level. This would mean that more advanced rosters could choose to make their lives easier without "robbing the awards from kiddy pool".1
-
adamdivine said:@Brigby any idea when we will hear an update about future tests or implementation of a permanent change?2
-
Fightmastermpq said:sirwookieechris said:Fightmastermpq said:zodiac339 said:Fightmastermpq said:JaGo said:Personally, I like the system as is. During the experiment my 2 star essential went from 80ish levels at the start to the 140's for SCL 7 Really?? That's just the easiest comparison I could think of. The others were just bonkers and it's the first time since SCL's were introduced that I didn't just automatically join SCL 8. And honestly, my roster did not start accelerating until 4 clears in PVE awarded a total of 25 CP. it was abyssmally slow until they made that change. Now that it takes 5 clears( right? ) to max out progression for an event it slowed down again for me considerably . That combined with these huge jumps in "starting" levels caused me to just quit the event altogether. That's a first for me as well. It was exhausting and chewed through health packs like sand storm through paper mache.
I understand the plight of the players with many champed 4 stars and 5's, but making it harder for the rest of us isn't the answer either.
I wish I had a great suggestion that was fair to all of us, but I don't. I simply wanted to state my point of view.
The 4 clear system and previous SCL 8 awards were perfect for me and I really want them back. It fit my busy schedule and accelerated my roster.
Regards,
-JaGo
Let us make a comparison here to PVP. Now, you might say a person does not deserve the top rewards from PVP without having the biggest roster, and in the case of PVP, this ends up being the case. And without the biggest roster, even the top progression reward is unattainable, as beyond a certain number of points, there is no way to really progress as points are lost due to attacks. There becomes a progression plateau at various levels of roster strength. A 4 star roster may rarely get to 1200, but will probably not. A 3 star roster might get 900 by some miracle. A 2 star roster should probably hit 300 and call it a day. Would your suggestion be to, "Drop down until you can deal with the difficulty and progress from there?" No. PVP is an area of the game where, regardless of the SCL, players are denied rewards they "deserve" in order to progress because the plateau of points is the same.
Players need to be able to play in the SCL they have access to, PVP or PVE. To say they shouldn't be there due to the strength of the roster is massively and inexcusably arrogant. Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
It's not unfair that a SCL8 player before that couldn't compete in the SCL8 test had rewards taken from them. It was unfair that they were ever getting those rewards in the first place. Be thankful you had them for so long, and pray that this test period moves at a snails pace. I'll do the opposite.0 -
Arphaxad said:Fightmastermpq said:sirwookieechris said:Fightmastermpq said:zodiac339 said:Fightmastermpq said:JaGo said:Personally, I like the system as is. During the experiment my 2 star essential went from 80ish levels at the start to the 140's for SCL 7 Really?? That's just the easiest comparison I could think of. The others were just bonkers and it's the first time since SCL's were introduced that I didn't just automatically join SCL 8. And honestly, my roster did not start accelerating until 4 clears in PVE awarded a total of 25 CP. it was abyssmally slow until they made that change. Now that it takes 5 clears( right? ) to max out progression for an event it slowed down again for me considerably . That combined with these huge jumps in "starting" levels caused me to just quit the event altogether. That's a first for me as well. It was exhausting and chewed through health packs like sand storm through paper mache.
I understand the plight of the players with many champed 4 stars and 5's, but making it harder for the rest of us isn't the answer either.
I wish I had a great suggestion that was fair to all of us, but I don't. I simply wanted to state my point of view.
The 4 clear system and previous SCL 8 awards were perfect for me and I really want them back. It fit my busy schedule and accelerated my roster.
Regards,
-JaGo
Let us make a comparison here to PVP. Now, you might say a person does not deserve the top rewards from PVP without having the biggest roster, and in the case of PVP, this ends up being the case. And without the biggest roster, even the top progression reward is unattainable, as beyond a certain number of points, there is no way to really progress as points are lost due to attacks. There becomes a progression plateau at various levels of roster strength. A 4 star roster may rarely get to 1200, but will probably not. A 3 star roster might get 900 by some miracle. A 2 star roster should probably hit 300 and call it a day. Would your suggestion be to, "Drop down until you can deal with the difficulty and progress from there?" No. PVP is an area of the game where, regardless of the SCL, players are denied rewards they "deserve" in order to progress because the plateau of points is the same.
Players need to be able to play in the SCL they have access to, PVP or PVE. To say they shouldn't be there due to the strength of the roster is massively and inexcusably arrogant. Players having a competitive edge in PVE because their lower tier roster somehow clears the content more efficiently that a higher tier roster is 1) impressive use of what the player has or 2) the fault of the Developers for not properly balancing the way scaling works at the higher levels. Don't expect the developers to punish lower tier players for the shortcomings of the developers because that, dear player, is far less fair that the scaling you face.
It's not unfair that a SCL8 player before that couldn't compete in the SCL8 test had rewards taken from them. It was unfair that they were ever getting those rewards in the first place. Be thankful you had them for so long, and pray that this test period moves at a snails pace. I'll do the opposite.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.7K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.5K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 502 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 420 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 296 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements