*** Quicksilver (Pietro Maximoff) ***

1171820222339

Comments

  • What if it stunned EVERYONE except quicksilver?

    What if the devs actually looked at Quicksilver speculation/fanmade post instead of producing Bagsilver?
  • Tacked on a build poll. Feel free to vote. Working my way down the line for the couple other new guys too. :]

    [EDIT]: I think they're all taken care of. Quicksilver, Fisk, Khamala, Xavier, Iron Fist had best build polls now. If I missed one, shot me a message or just report the thread.
    You should make "none of the above" an option haha.
  • Oldboy
    Oldboy Posts: 452 Mover and Shaker
    Quicksilver is so bad that not even Beast had a thread about how bad he is
  • evil panda
    evil panda Posts: 419 Mover and Shaker
    Quicksilver is so bad that the new bagforce looks OP compared to him

    Quicksilver is so bad that MMags was so ashamed of bringing him into this world that he nerfed himself
  • Dauthi
    Dauthi Posts: 995 Critical Contributor
    I understand he is supposed to be yawning because he's bored when you use Idle Hands (black), but it looks like when someone gets punched in their jaw and they are cradling it because it hurts. Every time I see it I feel like the other team is just wailing on the poor guy.

    Either that or he has a toothache and is in line to see the dentist. I hope they change it, it looks ridiculous. Anyone else feel the same?
  • Moon Roach
    Moon Roach Posts: 2,863 Chairperson of the Boards
    Quicksilver is so bad that not even Jamie Madrox can save him.
  • xdogg
    xdogg Posts: 334 Mover and Shaker
    5qr8z.jpg I don't think he has any teeth, some of their artwork has seemed pretty lame lately, imo
  • Give man a break, he clearly got hit by nerf, going from powerful/broken to bad/niche must have hurt. He shall continue to be like that until buff... hopefully.
  • Druss
    Druss Posts: 368 Mover and Shaker
    Anyone who played him I would think.
  • Phaserhawk
    Phaserhawk Posts: 2,676 Chairperson of the Boards
    Quicksilver is so bad that even X-Force said, "damn, you suck"
  • bknfoodie
    bknfoodie Posts: 53
    Quicksilver is so bad, everyone will be happy he's vaulted.
  • RWTDBurn
    RWTDBurn Posts: 291
    QuickSilver is so bad, I submitted a request to the developers to add an "Are you sure?" confirmation notice that will appear anytime you select him for your 3 man team. This should help reduce the rage quits when somone accidentally selects him.
  • RWTDBurn
    RWTDBurn Posts: 291
    QuickSilver is so bad, I'd rather watch an Uwe Boll movie marathon than to see another damn TU tile get locked.
  • xellessanova
    xellessanova Posts: 183 Tile Toppler
    Quicksilver is so bad he's retained the services of Matt Murdock and Jennifer Walters, Esq. to sue the development team for defamation of character.

    Quicksilver is so bad that people are only keeping him around to get a shot at picking up his sister.
  • So, when both QS have blue cover and the passive locks a tile. Why is it when I make a blue match to put 4 on the board, I am the one that takes the damage?
  • wymtime
    wymtime Posts: 3,760 Chairperson of the Boards
    ricin wrote:
    So, when both QS have blue cover and the passive locks a tile. Why is it when I make a blue match to put 4 on the board, I am the one that takes the damage?
    Because when the passive is activated on both characters the player always goes first. Look at Daken, your strike tiles go down before the AI. If the AI makes a match and there are 4 locked tiles on the board you do the damage. It is a double edge sword.
  • fmftint
    fmftint Posts: 3,653 Chairperson of the Boards
    ricin wrote:
    So, when both QS have blue cover and the passive locks a tile. Why is it when I make a blue match to put 4 on the board, I am the one that takes the damage?
    use the loaner and don't worry about it
  • Assuming no tiles get unlocked it should always go Player (lock 1), AI (Lock 2), Player (Lock 3), AI (Lock 4). The next blue match should then be Player (BOOM) and AI (Lock 1). So if there are an even number of lock tiles on the board (and dual QS) don't unlock any. If there are an odd number, try and unlock one.
  • _RiO_
    _RiO_ Posts: 1,047 Chairperson of the Boards
    Lerysh wrote:
    Assuming no tiles get unlocked it should always go Player (lock 1), AI (Lock 2), Player (Lock 3), AI (Lock 4). The next blue match should then be Player (BOOM) and AI (Lock 1). So if there are an even number of lock tiles on the board (and dual QS) don't unlock any. If there are an odd number, try and unlock one.

    Does that sound like it puts the "Puzzle" in "Puzzle Quest" in completely the wrong way to anyone else, or just me?
    If I were a betting man, I'd say this is another one of those little "Oops, you did something we didn't expect you to do." moments that the devs pride themselves on...
  • _RiO_ wrote:
    Lerysh wrote:
    Assuming no tiles get unlocked it should always go Player (lock 1), AI (Lock 2), Player (Lock 3), AI (Lock 4). The next blue match should then be Player (BOOM) and AI (Lock 1). So if there are an even number of lock tiles on the board (and dual QS) don't unlock any. If there are an odd number, try and unlock one.

    Does that sound like it puts the "Puzzle" in "Puzzle Quest" in completely the wrong way to anyone else, or just me?
    If I were a betting man, I'd say this is another one of those little "Oops, you did something we didn't expect you to do." moments that the devs pride themselves on...

    Did they not expect the Mirror match? When they force them on us every single PvP event?