[SPOILER] Upcoming characters & contents /2505/

11415171920147

Comments

  • turul
    turul Posts: 1,622 Chairperson of the Boards
    Elektra
    Luke Cage
    SquGirl
    Star Lord
    Cyclops
    ?
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif
  • stochasticism
    stochasticism Posts: 1,181 Chairperson of the Boards
    Professor X
  • turul wrote:
    Elektra
    Luke Cage
    SquGirl
    Star Lord
    Cyclops
    ?
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif

    ERMAGAWD, how many up votes do you want to spill this time?!? Lol
  • turul wrote:
    Elektra
    Luke Cage
    SquGirl
    Star Lord
    Cyclops
    ?
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif

    Gah, another 4* already?
  • turul wrote:
    Elektra
    Luke Cage
    SquGirl
    Star Lord
    Cyclops
    ?
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif

    So how would 3 passives be viable? Obviously it could be a support character in some capacity. But what if we get a character whose match damage scales? Maybe one of those passives scales your match damage based on your current AP... or "momentum."

    Baseless speculation confirms 4* Juggernaut icon_e_wink.gif

    EDIT: Mostly baseless
  • yogi_
    yogi_ Posts: 1,236 Chairperson of the Boards
    4* Professor X?
  • Gonna guess Gambit, even though he seems more like an active damage dealer.
  • DrStrange-616
    DrStrange-616 Posts: 993 Critical Contributor
    Vision, to coincide with his first big full reveal in A2 trailer.
  • Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?
  • Trisul
    Trisul Posts: 887 Critical Contributor
    Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?
    These leaks are a pretty grey area in general, which is probably why they didn't outright say stop. Lots of discussion about it in previous pages of this thread... I don't really sense a consensus.
  • GothicKratos
    GothicKratos Posts: 1,821 Chairperson of the Boards
    He's not breaking any rules. We can't rightfully do anything do him about it. They (a.k.a. the publishing house) "frown on it". All they can really do is suggest it is a problem for them, like they did in the video.
  • Marc_Spector
    Marc_Spector Posts: 628 Critical Contributor
    turul wrote:
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif

    the first all-passive character!?!!?
    Might my 3-passives idea for Man-Thing be true? icon_eek.gif
    (I would love that)
  • cjkmpq wrote:
    turul wrote:
    3 passives for one character....

    The Watchers! No one can be more passive than those guys.

    Want. Bad.
  • atomzed
    atomzed Posts: 1,753 Chairperson of the Boards
    3 passive sounds interesting. If the passive are great, like how falcon blue and yellow ability is, it could be a great 4*.
  • turul wrote:
    Elektra
    Luke Cage
    SquGirl
    Star Lord
    Cyclops
    ?
    ? <-- 3 passives, hope you see some pattern icon_e_smile.gif

    So how would 3 passives be viable? Obviously it could be a support character in some capacity. But what if we get a character whose match damage scales? Maybe one of those passives scales your match damage based on your current AP... or "momentum."

    Baseless speculation confirms 4* Juggernaut icon_e_wink.gif

    EDIT: Mostly baseless

    It could be a character that only had actives in certain situations. Like say: *red passive: Johnny Blaze form* - When Ghost Rider or an ally is dealt over 20% of his health in damage, this ability becomes: 5 red ap: Penance Stare. Ghost Rider looks into his victim's eyes, seeking vengeance. Deals 4x the damage that was dealt to Ghost Rider or his ally. Ghost Rider transforms back into Johnny Blaze.

    This kinda stuff makes for way more interesting defensive characters than just protect tiles in my opinion
  • Mawtful
    Mawtful Posts: 1,646 Chairperson of the Boards
    Recall that the release info for Doom's Purple ability described it as the "first active-passive" ability. Reading between the lines, I got the impression that the devs saw active-passive as a new way forward. My thoughts and speculation on this are:

    Active-passive abilities can essentially be 2 abilities for the one slot. I think this concept will be important to making a clear distinction between 3* and 4* characters - basically 4*'s get "more" stuff. If you look at the 4*'s we currently have, there's already a lot of abilities that do extra "stuff". XForce's Yellow essentially has two different modes; Fury's Yellow has a whole range of different effects depending on what you've got; Th4r's abilities are already fairly strong, and they leave behind charged tiles which further impacts the way you interact with available matches; Star-lord; etc.

    Doom's purple is really maybe only worth 1.5 abilities instead of two wholly distinct abilities, but that extra .5 represents him locking out purple tiles, which we all know means he plays nice with Patch. If the active-passives do become both more frequent and mostly the abilities of 4*'s then the fact that 3* Doom gets to play with one also feels quite fitting.

    So Doom was a "trial run" to see how these new abilities would work in the wild, and how we reacted. I am fairly certain we'll see many more active-passives, and they'll mostly be on 4* characters.

    As for a character with 3 passives. Well, we'll need to wait for more details - they could be active-passives, but there's certainly no rule that says they're not just regular old passives. It will be interesting to see how it turns out regardless.
  • turul
    turul Posts: 1,622 Chairperson of the Boards
    Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?

    Thats why I only shared very little this time icon_e_smile.gif
    A little excitement couldn't be that bad...

    Abilities look fine and fail-safe
  • turul wrote:
    Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?

    Thats why I only shared very little this time icon_e_smile.gif
    A little excitement couldn't be that bad...

    Abilities look fine and fail-safe

    Any word on the character between Cyclopes and his "3 passive ability" toon?
  • Quebbster
    Quebbster Posts: 8,070 Chairperson of the Boards
    ecir2002 wrote:
    turul wrote:
    Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?

    Thats why I only shared very little this time icon_e_smile.gif
    A little excitement couldn't be that bad...

    Abilities look fine and fail-safe

    Any word on the character between Cyclopes and his "3 passive ability" toon?
    I bet it's the In-betweener.
  • turul
    turul Posts: 1,622 Chairperson of the Boards
    ecir2002 wrote:
    turul wrote:
    Turul. Honestly, did you not watch the q and a video?

    Thats why I only shared very little this time icon_e_smile.gif
    A little excitement couldn't be that bad...

    Abilities look fine and fail-safe

    Any word on the character between Cyclopes and his "3 passive ability" toon?

    Should fit well with strike-tiling teams.
This discussion has been closed.