Borstock said: ThaRoadWarrior said: PiMacleod said: what are your thoughts on 4* Thanos? Just wanted to say that I've been trying to convince people Th4nos was better than everyone thought he was for awhile now, but even I wasn't using him all that regularly. There are so many characters in the game now that there are a lot of characters that get totally ignored even though they are well designed and sneaky good. It's a shame and makes me long for the days when they forced you to choose from a specific group of characters when playing certain PvE events. Those were annoying when rosters were small, but now they'd probably be a blast.
ThaRoadWarrior said: PiMacleod said: what are your thoughts on 4* Thanos? Just wanted to say that I've been trying to convince people Th4nos was better than everyone thought he was for awhile now, but even I wasn't using him all that regularly.
PiMacleod said: what are your thoughts on 4* Thanos?
DAZ0273 said: The lack of compensation offered is interesting. It is like they are saying we knew she was useless, we accidentally made her useful and now we have returned her to her correct state!
Vhailorx said: DAZ0273 said: The lack of compensation offered is interesting. It is like they are saying we knew she was useless, we accidentally made her useful and now we have returned her to her correct state! The term "compensation" is pretty amusing, given how little they have offered for nerfed characters in the past.
MegaBee said: Vhailorx said: DAZ0273 said: The lack of compensation offered is interesting. It is like they are saying we knew she was useless, we accidentally made her useful and now we have returned her to her correct state! The term "compensation" is pretty amusing, given how little they have offered for nerfed characters in the past. Heck, I don't even want compensation. I wasn't using 5-star Carol before Polaris, and I didn't add a single cover to her; she was already at 5 green thanks to RNG. Just some kind of in-game notification so I knew that it wasn't some kind of error. I almost contacted customer support!
pheregas said: MegaBee said: Vhailorx said: DAZ0273 said: The lack of compensation offered is interesting. It is like they are saying we knew she was useless, we accidentally made her useful and now we have returned her to her correct state! The term "compensation" is pretty amusing, given how little they have offered for nerfed characters in the past. Heck, I don't even want compensation. I wasn't using 5-star Carol before Polaris, and I didn't add a single cover to her; she was already at 5 green thanks to RNG. Just some kind of in-game notification so I knew that it wasn't some kind of error. I almost contacted customer support! You should have. Danvers is one of my highest 5s, but only by accident. She exists in a pre- HP/CP nerf state in the days of 4/4/5/4/4/5 releases. I've only ever used her as an essential, but even I'm annoyed that they'd just stealth change a character, even if I don't ever use her. It just seems unnecessarily shady.FWIW, I just took my own advice and reported it at as bug through the in-game HELP.
MegaBee said: pheregas said: MegaBee said: Vhailorx said: DAZ0273 said: The lack of compensation offered is interesting. It is like they are saying we knew she was useless, we accidentally made her useful and now we have returned her to her correct state! The term "compensation" is pretty amusing, given how little they have offered for nerfed characters in the past. Heck, I don't even want compensation. I wasn't using 5-star Carol before Polaris, and I didn't add a single cover to her; she was already at 5 green thanks to RNG. Just some kind of in-game notification so I knew that it wasn't some kind of error. I almost contacted customer support! You should have. Danvers is one of my highest 5s, but only by accident. She exists in a pre- HP/CP nerf state in the days of 4/4/5/4/4/5 releases. I've only ever used her as an essential, but even I'm annoyed that they'd just stealth change a character, even if I don't ever use her. It just seems unnecessarily shady.FWIW, I just took my own advice and reported it at as bug through the in-game HELP. I decided to check the power description before reporting the bug and saw that it had been changed.
Dogface said: It looks like this change would actually be a boost if Polaris didn't exist. Same number of rows destroyed, while keeping the friendly tiles.
Vhailorx said: Borstock said: ThaRoadWarrior said: PiMacleod said: what are your thoughts on 4* Thanos? Just wanted to say that I've been trying to convince people Th4nos was better than everyone thought he was for awhile now, but even I wasn't using him all that regularly. There are so many characters in the game now that there are a lot of characters that get totally ignored even though they are well designed and sneaky good. It's a shame and makes me long for the days when they forced you to choose from a specific group of characters when playing certain PvE events. Those were annoying when rosters were small, but now they'd probably be a blast. Heroic events and cl10 would not work well. There are very few characters that can reliably handle challenging level 650 opponents. Locking those characters put would make cl10 very frustrating. And in general, I think heroic events would be fun for those select few of us who have extremely deep rosters (the variety would be a welcome change of pace). But heroics were very hard on new players when the game had less than 75 characters, let alone more than 200. I think there would be lots of frustrated players if they were reintroduced now.But what about node lockouts (i.e, player can't use any characters on the ai team)? Could they come back without hurting the average player experience? It might be a middle ground.