Fiddler wrote: I have not noticed any Jace decks out there, and I really like mine for grinding. It has good bounce for board control, Mizzium for mana control, and some heavy hitters when you add in supports. At level 50 you push out cards pretty quick too. Currently at 94.8% over 1791 matches won and 99 lost.Jace Talent of the Telepath (R) Sword of the Animist (R) Sphinx's Tutelage (U) Turn to Frog (R) Anchor to the Ether (U) Mizzium Meddler (R) Disciple of the Ring (M) Harbringer of Tides (R) Soulblade Djinn (R) Brawler's Plate (U)
Nerimos wrote: I think I would switch sword of the animist for Jaces sanctum because it's just so great in slowing down the opponent and I'm not sure if sword of the animist is a good idea if you play with that many supports. Also with the combination of brawlers plate and Jaces first ability you actually don't need anchor of the ether. I would switch it for a double land maybe. But all in all a good blue deck. I'm a bit jelly because of soulblade and disciple. I want them so badly.
Cipher_8 wrote: http://oi63.tinypic.com/261gqic.jpg I have not purchased anything with real money. That's all through unlocks and rewards purchased via the I earned in story and daily reward logins mainly. My go to color is White/Gideon. Lvl 45. Though I bounced back and forth between him and Nissa to get my W/L on quick match I mainly used Gideon. Now Jace I'm leveling up too because I enjoy how Blue plays. Most my wins come via White Powa (jk) though. P.S. Having read this thread though I'm kinda disappointed and unimpressed with the way the game is going. I feel it's lame that so many focus on speed rather than victory. It's more about speed than playing tactically and winning? Really...? I've played where I've been taken down to 1 health but held on and fought back taking like 70 of their health down to win 1 - 0. That's far more satisfying than winning easy and fast. I've also been mis matched by the system once as lvl 15 Jace with 24 health vs lvl 40'ish Nissa with 70 health AND WON... Those are the matches I remember...
EDUSAN wrote: well...thats what normally happens it happens in hearthstone in which you play with a deck with a fairly lower winrate but in which the matches take half the time to finish and so when you get to the end of the ladder you the amount of matches you played outrun the extra wins you could have with a better win ratio If the way Ladder worked was changed to "everyone plays 50 matches, the one with a higher win ratio will finish 1st", then everyone would be fine tunning the deck and doing their best to get up to 100% win rate I play nissa most of the time because i win fast and i have Liliana when i want to play a challenging game with a more thought deck (or to try crazy things) the way it is now there is no escaping that win faster > win more