JesseRich wrote: Is today the day that the results will be posted? I'm anxious to see these results. If you need assistance with any of the vote counting or character write ups, I am happy to help. Let's get these results posted!!!
HawkeyeSucks wrote: JesseRich wrote: Is today the day that the results will be posted? I'm anxious to see these results. If you need assistance with any of the vote counting or character write ups, I am happy to help. Let's get these results posted!!! I offered to help, and did, giving a week of my time to get these posted sooner than later. That was on September 29th. It's over a month later now and these still haven't been posted. I am confused, disappointed and a bit upset. I feel like I wasted my time.
Kryztoff46 wrote: I think He means since the voted started
Ben Grimm wrote: Well, I for one am outraged, that someone taking on a huge work assignment voluntarily and for no compensation is taking a little longer than I would like for something. I think we should all demand our money back from mischiefmaker.
mischiefmaker wrote: Hey folks, sincere apologies. I'm making progress on these but the last few weeks have been pretty hectic both in-game (yay anniversary content!) and in real life, so I've had to put some things on the back burner. Unfortunately that includes writeups. I'm aware that this means the list will likely be outdated by the time it arrives but I'm hoping that there will be enough fun/useful content to make that tradeoff worthwhile. HawkeyeSucks, I'm very sorry that you're disappointed -- I know you've put a lot of work into your contribution and I do appreciate it. Everyone else, hang tight! Results are coming, I promise. And once I get this version out the door I'll be soliciting some opinions on how we can make the rankings more sustainable, so if this is a thing you care about having in the future, please do weigh in. Thanks much for all the kind words and appreciation! That's the stuff that keeps me motivated.
Nonce Equitaur 2 wrote: You may as well put out results for Yelena / Bagman, just to get things started. It's not really worthwhile doing a big write-up on those two.
Ben Grimm wrote: Nonce Equitaur 2 wrote: You may as well put out results for Yelena / Bagman, just to get things started. It's not really worthwhile doing a big write-up on those two. Actually the big news for this iteration was that those two finished first and second in voting. The other piece of big news was that there was a problem with the new survey program. These two pieces of news may be connected.
jimmyjames wrote: I love these write up too but I think maybe we should do another round of voting. That way the rankings will be current, you could use the write ups you have already done, and people aren't going to be looking for a new list in November.