HoundofShadow said: What's the link between iHulk and Ikaris besides their revive in MPQ?
dianetics said: He is still boring. He is not fun. His in air match damage feels high.His damage in his tier while airborne is near col5.TBH the last marvel movie I saw was endgame.I don’t care about specific toons.you are right about his match damage, and I never denied it. I only said he was boring and not fun, and he doesn’t pair well with heimdall.I use the characters that help me win. I don’t care who they are, but after using him in the welcome to shield he does not feel balanced at all.
Akoni said: dianetics said: He is still boring. He is not fun. His in air match damage feels high.His damage in his tier while airborne is near col5.TBH the last marvel movie I saw was endgame.I don’t care about specific toons.you are right about his match damage, and I never denied it. I only said he was boring and not fun, and he doesn’t pair well with heimdall.I use the characters that help me win. I don’t care who they are, but after using him in the welcome to shield he does not feel balanced at all. Why did this get a flag? I don't see anything offensive or against forum rules.
Sekilicious said: Btw, it was just posted on Reddit that Ikarus feeds iHulk. I assume because they’re both immortal.
HoundofShadow said: I just realised that when Ikaris is alone and airborne, both his passives (make a match when he doesn't have any active ally and deal 380% match damage) will trigger. Imagine him being a 5*.
dianetics said: Hound you are right but the only problem is that he airborne for 4 turns for 6 ap.With be4st and Karnak they are most likely jumping in front eating incoming damage.You can stun them, use powers on them, or knock them out.Ikarus is doing anywhere from 400-2000 every turn with little you can do about it.Using him it just feels like that damage is too high and could possibly use a slight adjustment down from that 380.