Gambit Character Update Details (6/26/18)
Comments
-
Brigby said:Thanks for all of the feedback everyone. I've compiled it all together, and passed it along to the team for evaluation.LifeofAgony said:Bowgentle said:thedarkphoenix said:So a champed 450 gambit sold will net how many tokens?0
-
Seriously dude? He literally just told you the answer to the question. And you’re STILL gonna question it?2
-
Anyone know how much for an unleved Gambit? Mine was broken down by customer service and I think I’d get more if I roster each cover as a separate character, no?0
-
Bowgentle said:thedarkphoenix said:So a champed 450 gambit sold will net how many tokens?
0 -
Rockwell75 said:Bowgentle said:thedarkphoenix said:So a champed 450 gambit sold will net how many tokens?0
-
Brigby said:Thanks for all of the feedback everyone. I've compiled it all together, and passed it along to the team for evaluation.LifeofAgony said:Bowgentle said:thedarkphoenix said:So a champed 450 gambit sold will net how many tokens?
We need like, a formula or something. Telling us what the token number is based on isn't enough for us to figure out what our own total would be. It's like having a cake recipe that starts with "Ingredients: Things that go in cake." While technically correct, it isn't *useful*.
(I mean, we can make an educated guess based on forum posts here, but having an official clarification just in case the forum users are wrong would be nice)1 -
JHawkInc said:Brigby said:Thanks for all of the feedback everyone. I've compiled it all together, and passed it along to the team for evaluation.LifeofAgony said:Bowgentle said:thedarkphoenix said:So a champed 450 gambit sold will net how many tokens?
We need like, a formula or something. Telling us what the token number is based on isn't enough for us to figure out what our own total would be. It's like having a cake recipe that starts with "Ingredients: Things that go in cake." While technically correct, it isn't *useful*.
(I mean, we can make an educated guess based on forum posts here, but having an official clarification just in case the forum users are wrong would be nice)0 -
4
-
MoosePrime said:
Anyways, looks like a good deal. One more month of using Gambit for me before I sell him and accept that twice a year I miss the 5* essential node in pve.2 -
So it's realy worth to sell a 5*? Random covers means a few duds. Worse case lots of duds. I am more inclined to keep him.0
-
@Brigby
With the introduction of 5* essentials, selling off 5* characters completely is no longer viable for high level players. You could remove all his abilities entirely and we'd still need at least a 450 Gambit just for his PVE essential. As such, the more someone has invested in Gambit, the less realistic it is that they can take advantage of compensation for the nerf.
Please consider allowing players with a championed Gambit to sell off champion levels instead of selling the whole character. This would allow players to recoup some of their investment, rather than punishing players for wisely devoting resources toward the strongest character in the game.1 -
Looking at 36 new 5* covers if I sell off Gambit....decisions...decisions0
-
huktonfonix said:@Brigby
With the introduction of 5* essentials, selling off 5* characters completely is no longer viable for high level players. You could remove all his abilities entirely and we'd still need at least a 450 Gambit just for his PVE essential. As such, the more someone has invested in Gambit, the less realistic it is that they can take advantage of compensation for the nerf.
Please consider allowing players with a championed Gambit to sell off champion levels instead of selling the whole character. This would allow players to recoup some of their investment, rather than punishing players for wisely devoting resources toward the strongest character in the game.
I have 0 empathy for people who chased gambit hard and suddenly expect d3 will bend over backwards to accommodate. Keep him or take the 1:1 compensation. Those are the options, and neither are unreasonable.0 -
LifeofAgony said:huktonfonix said:@Brigby
With the introduction of 5* essentials, selling off 5* characters completely is no longer viable for high level players. You could remove all his abilities entirely and we'd still need at least a 450 Gambit just for his PVE essential. As such, the more someone has invested in Gambit, the less realistic it is that they can take advantage of compensation for the nerf.
Please consider allowing players with a championed Gambit to sell off champion levels instead of selling the whole character. This would allow players to recoup some of their investment, rather than punishing players for wisely devoting resources toward the strongest character in the game.
I have 0 empathy for people who chased gambit hard and suddenly expect d3 will bend over backwards to accommodate. Keep him or take the 1:1 compensation. Those are the options, and neither are unreasonable.
The compensation offered, while better than the OML comp, is still very bad. Selling a 450 Gambit will net you half your ISO back and 13 covers spread out over 26 characters, including some absolute stinkers. That one level on half your characters may be a dupe cover (worth 1/3 of a cover), an early cover that brings it still nowhere to championing, or a Champ level. None of these options is even remotely close to the value of champed 5.
And considering they are now giving away newly released Characters (which is sweet btw), so that people can freely skip bad 5s to continue their hoard, those few covers offered look even worse.0 -
Are people asking for better compensation, or to sell off levels, or for an exchange for 5* covers of their choosing willing to give up all the rewards they received dominating with their Gambits while others not blessed by the RNG gods got nothing?0
-
Daiches said:mods Ducky Brigby
any reason this thread is permanently buried on page three after unstickying? It doesn't move to first page after a new comment.
As fmftint mentions above, this discussion thread technically lives in the Character sub-forum, and that is where you can see it constantly update whenever a new comment is added.1 -
@Brigby any chances on removing the teammate power restriction on Gambit's black before this goes live? It's overkill to keep that on there when he doesn't generate AP at near the same level he used to. As mentioned previously, Iron Man 40 and Vulture can both generate more AP than him in the same time frame, and much more easily in the case of Vulture.4
-
Player1575 said:Brigby any chances on removing the teammate power restriction on Gambit's black before this goes live? It's overkill to keep that on there when he doesn't generate AP at near the same level he used to. As mentioned previously, Iron Man 40 and Vulture can both generate more AP than him in the same time frame, and much more easily in the case of Vulture.5
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 299 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements