Gilded Lotus: Bait and switch

124

Comments

  • jtwood
    jtwood Posts: 1,285 Chairperson of the Boards
    babar3355 said:
    Now if you are arguing that you would not buy Karn even for crystals in the current form of Gilded Lotus, then I guess there is a fair point.  But I really have a hard time buying that argument.
    Go on
  • FindingHeart8
    FindingHeart8 Posts: 2,731 Chairperson of the Boards
    babar3355 said:
    jtwood said:
    babar3355 said:
    Now if you are arguing that you would not buy Karn even for crystals in the current form of Gilded Lotus, then I guess there is a fair point.  But I really have a hard time buying that argument.
    Go on
    Ok, Karn is by far the strongest planeswalker in the game in colorless nodes, and better than any of the mono-walkers for colored nodes.  He also has the most options in the game which makes him fun to experiment with..  Anyone who would not buy him for crystals doesn't really understand the game... lol
    that's a pretty strong claim you're making there...though I can't fully contest it (as I'm yet to purchase Karn), I'd wager that as strong as he may be, he's not incontestably the strongest in colored nodes (in all color nodes though I'd definitely agree with you).

    And I, my good sir, have a stupendous understanding of this game!  **except for the new parts I haven't read yet...but we're not counting those ;)

  • jtwood
    jtwood Posts: 1,285 Chairperson of the Boards
    babar3355 said:
    jtwood said:
    babar3355 said:
    Now if you are arguing that you would not buy Karn even for crystals in the current form of Gilded Lotus, then I guess there is a fair point.  But I really have a hard time buying that argument.
    Go on
    Ok, Karn is by far the strongest planeswalker in the game in colorless nodes, and better than any of the mono-walkers for colored nodes.  He also has the most options in the game which makes him fun to experiment with..  Anyone who would not buy him for crystals doesn't really understand the game... lol
    Sure, but how does that pertain to people who bought this stuff for cash? The topic of this thread.
  • Chavez303
    Chavez303 Posts: 42 Just Dropped In
    I paid money for Karn......would i have paid money for him knowing lotus was going to be nerfed that hard.....probably not.  But it wouldn't have stopped me paying for him with crystals.  

    The point is people put down cash for a whole product.  That product is now changing.  I get it why people are upset.  I'm one of them. 

    I agree with Gabrosin.  Its pretty much pay for something the general populace will never get.  I dont think thats right either. 

    At this point, none of this surprises me....shame on me for thinking it would be better.
  • GrizzoMtGPQ
    GrizzoMtGPQ Posts: 776 Critical Contributor
    Theros said:
    Thank you @fight4thedream apology accepted. I think it was an honest mistake and I do hope you get well soon @Brigby

    Now I can get back to being irritated at the actual problem. 

    No, I don’t actually think that Gilded Lotus was broken in its initial form. I thought it was a very, very good card and, like others have mentioned, it was the main reason I bought Karn... I think that it is too limiting to restrict him to only the color of the node, rather than give him access to all the cards. I may as well just use a dual color PW instead. But I knew about that and, to me, Gilded Lotus made up for it. I probably would not have purchased Karn without it. 

    In the past, it’s taken months of outrage before gamebreakers were nerfed and we predicted just how broken they would be and asked them to change it before release (see Baral—we all kinda knew Baral would change).  In this case, I don’t think Gilded Lotus is game-breaking so I wasn’t expecting it and I’m mostly mad at myself because I’m feeling foolish. 
    wait...he can only use the colors of the node he's in?  Are you serious???
    Yes only the colors of the nodes he's in. He's useless those nodes. He is somewhat viable in mono white cause of good supports.
    He should have access to all cards to make him viable. Facing Karn in TG or all color across Ixalan does not indicate a powerful PW; he's basically a free win just like many cycling decks.
    Restriction to node color was unnecessary and frankly pointless. On paper, having access to all colors would make him OP. In reality, he is below average.
    Karn is not below average. He can use all colors in all PVE. That's top tier.
  • Gunmix25
    Gunmix25 Posts: 1,442 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited May 2018

    Chavez303 said:
    I paid money for Karn......would i have paid money for him knowing lotus was going to be nerfed that hard.....probably not.  But it wouldn't have stopped me paying for him with crystals.  

    The point is people put down cash for a whole product.  That product is now changing.  I get it why people are upset.  I'm one of them. 

    I agree with Gabrosin.  Its pretty much pay for something the general populace will never get.  I dont think thats right either. 

    At this point, none of this surprises me....shame on me for thinking it would be better.


    You do realize that Karn was among the cheapest PWs to have gone up for sale, right?  That and he is among the strongest PWs ... period. Like @GrizzoMtGPQ said, he is a top tier PW.


    babar3355 said:
    The point is, you cant make the argument that people paid cash for Karn rather than waiting to buy him for crystals, just so they would get Gilded Lotus.  Because they would get Gilded Lotus if they bought Karn for crystals too.  So the only argument is they wouldn't have bought Karn, even for crystals, in Gilded Lotus'  nerfed form.

    If that what people are saying, then I think they are either blowing smoke or haven't played him enough to understand his power.

    I also agree with everything @babar3355 is saying too. I don't know a soul in here that is willing to shell out that much cash for a single rare … unless … it was for a PW  

    All I know is that this discussion is being watched by D3 and Oktagon and all of those players who said that they bought the pack just for Gilded Lotus... a rare of all things. and not Karn is only going to be giving them ideas that they can jack up the price thinking that "hey, these guys were willing to pay $20 for just Gilded lotus, a single rare and here we are selling three rares at $3.99?!?!?"

    Seriously, what do you think will happen?


  • jtwood
    jtwood Posts: 1,285 Chairperson of the Boards
    Gunmix25 said:

    I also agree with everything @babar3355 is saying too. I don't know a soul in here that is willing to shell out that much cash for a single rareunless … it was for a PW  

    All I know is that this discussion is being watched by D3 and Oktagon and all of those players who said that they bought the pack just for Gilded Lotus... a rare of all things. and not Karn is only going to be giving them ideas that they can jack up the price thinking that "hey, these guys were willing to pay $20 for just Gilded lotus, a single rare and here we are selling three rares at $3.99?!?!?"

    Seriously, what do you think will happen?

    Well, now you know one (sort of). Hi!

    I paid $20 for Gilded Lotus + Karn (not the other way around).

    • I evaluated Gilded Lotus as being very powerful.
    • There is no guarantee I will open any card. Only probabilities.
    • Crafting every rare in a new set would take a long time. That means the guaranteed minimum cost of a rare is pretty high in free-to-play terms
    • Karn is a PW with a fixed, known cost. It's not even an oppressive cost in FtP terms. And to some extent, I can buy him at my convenience.
    Since the Lotus bundle came with Karn, I paid for it knowing that it would probably be 2 months before I could even use Karn - but Lotus was a powerful card that I could use now and in a lot of places right away. There was no risk that I would never open it or not craft it. The value seemed to be there in my mind.

    What I didn't realize was that the Lotus always came with Karn even if I got him later for crystals. With that knowledge now, I can say that I would have just waited and not spent the cash. So that was my mistake for not understanding how they sell stuff in this game. I'll openly admit that.

    But I stand by my original logic: Paying cash to remove chance from an outcome is really the best way to spend money in this game (assuming you want to pay money at all). PWs can always be had for a known price. There is no chance in acquiring them. Other cards - even lower rarity cards* - are not guaranteed without spending a lot of crystals to be able to craft every card. So if you have a chance to straight up buy a card, it makes sense to consider the offer. The only question is: Is it good enough for the price?

    *I've been playing for around 7 months now and I only now opened Demolish over the weekend :-/

  • __Adam
    __Adam Posts: 111 Tile Toppler
    Gunmix25 said:

    Chavez303 said:
    I paid money for Karn......would i have paid money for him knowing lotus was going to be nerfed that hard.....probably not.  But it wouldn't have stopped me paying for him with crystals.  

    The point is people put down cash for a whole product.  That product is now changing.  I get it why people are upset.  I'm one of them. 

    I agree with Gabrosin.  Its pretty much pay for something the general populace will never get.  I dont think thats right either. 

    At this point, none of this surprises me....shame on me for thinking it would be better.


    You do realize that Karn was among the cheapest PWs to have gone up for sale, right?  That and he is among the strongest PWs ... period. Like @GrizzoMtGPQ said, he is a top tier PW.


    babar3355 said:
    The point is, you cant make the argument that people paid cash for Karn rather than waiting to buy him for crystals, just so they would get Gilded Lotus.  Because they would get Gilded Lotus if they bought Karn for crystals too.  So the only argument is they wouldn't have bought Karn, even for crystals, in Gilded Lotus'  nerfed form.

    If that what people are saying, then I think they are either blowing smoke or haven't played him enough to understand his power.

    I also agree with everything @babar3355 is saying too. I don't know a soul in here that is willing to shell out that much cash for a single rare … unless … it was for a PW  

    All I know is that this discussion is being watched by D3 and Oktagon and all of those players who said that they bought the pack just for Gilded Lotus... a rare of all things. and not Karn is only going to be giving them ideas that they can jack up the price thinking that "hey, these guys were willing to pay $20 for just Gilded lotus, a single rare and here we are selling three rares at $3.99?!?!?"

    Seriously, what do you think will happen?


    The rarity of the card is entirely irrelevant, as are the exact legalities involved.

    People liked the what the bundle allowed them to do with their existing collection of PWs and cards. They liked its utility in the current meta and events.  They felt that impact provided enough value to justify a purchase.  Less than a month later they are no longer getting the value they paid for.  Its not unreasonable to be upset. 

    At this point people are arguing over intent (malice vs incompetence) but I don't know that it's relevant; either way it's a breach of trust and a loss of confidence. Considering that they've done this before, and stand to profit from it (again), I think either side could make a compelling case:

    bait-and-switch
    noun
    noun: bait-and-switch
    1. the action (generally illegal) of advertising goods that are an apparent bargain, with the intention of substituting inferior or more expensive goods.
      "a bait-and-switch scheme"
  • Gunmix25
    Gunmix25 Posts: 1,442 Chairperson of the Boards
    edited May 2018
    --Adam said:
    Gunmix25 said:

    Chavez303 said:
    I paid money for Karn......would i have paid money for him knowing lotus was going to be nerfed that hard.....probably not.  But it wouldn't have stopped me paying for him with crystals.  

    The point is people put down cash for a whole product.  That product is now changing.  I get it why people are upset.  I'm one of them. 

    I agree with Gabrosin.  Its pretty much pay for something the general populace will never get.  I dont think thats right either. 

    At this point, none of this surprises me....shame on me for thinking it would be better.


    You do realize that Karn was among the cheapest PWs to have gone up for sale, right?  That and he is among the strongest PWs ... period. Like @GrizzoMtGPQ said, he is a top tier PW.


    babar3355 said:
    The point is, you cant make the argument that people paid cash for Karn rather than waiting to buy him for crystals, just so they would get Gilded Lotus.  Because they would get Gilded Lotus if they bought Karn for crystals too.  So the only argument is they wouldn't have bought Karn, even for crystals, in Gilded Lotus'  nerfed form.

    If that what people are saying, then I think they are either blowing smoke or haven't played him enough to understand his power.

    I also agree with everything @babar3355 is saying too. I don't know a soul in here that is willing to shell out that much cash for a single rare … unless … it was for a PW  

    All I know is that this discussion is being watched by D3 and Oktagon and all of those players who said that they bought the pack just for Gilded Lotus... a rare of all things. and not Karn is only going to be giving them ideas that they can jack up the price thinking that "hey, these guys were willing to pay $20 for just Gilded lotus, a single rare and here we are selling three rares at $3.99?!?!?"

    Seriously, what do you think will happen?


    The rarity of the card is entirely irrelevant, as are the exact legalities involved.

    People liked the what the bundle allowed them to do with their existing collection of PWs and cards. They liked its utility in the current meta and events.  They felt that impact provided enough value to justify a purchase.  Less than a month later they are no longer getting the value they paid for.  Its not unreasonable to be upset. 

    At this point people are arguing over intent (malice vs incompetence) but I don't know that it's relevant; either way it's a breach of trust and a loss of confidence. Considering that they've done this before, and stand to profit from it (again), I think either side could make a compelling case:

    bait-and-switch
    noun
    noun: bait-and-switch
    1. the action (generally illegal) of advertising goods that are an apparent bargain, with the intention of substituting inferior or more expensive goods.
      "a bait-and-switch scheme"
    No need to be redundant,  everyone here knows the definition.  

    That said, explain overwatch and the nerfs they make almost monthly and how that isn't bait and switch? Bevause they offer  new characters and these releases are a draw to new players,  yet quite often they need to nerf abilities that the devs deem to be game breaking... despite players who think otherwise. 

    To claim bait and switch you need evidence that the intent to switch out product prior to the sale had existed.  Something that no one here had been able to.  

    Changes  occur to the game. When a card is banned in paper MTG... is it bait and switch? When Mercy's ult is tweaked after having bought the game to play her, is it bait and switch? When I paid for Baral, was it bait and switch when they nerfed him? When I bought Destiny I was promised up to the latest PS console release for the life of that game which would receive new content, only to have the game cancelled for the next version. That bait and switch? Granted the latter is long term but that was the promise they made to players,  up to 7 years of game life on one purchase. The changes occured but none of these had original intent to switch and honestly believe their business handlings were just that. Honest.

  • sherman2
    sherman2 Posts: 12 Just Dropped In
    So 80 crystals is nice refund but what if I have no recept left on my gmail?
  • andrewvanmarle
    andrewvanmarle Posts: 978 Critical Contributor
    Kinesia said:
    People are arguing over intent because intent is the core of ""bait and switch"", if it wasn't their intent then that isn't what happened.

    If I trip and stab you with a knife or whether I do it on purpose, you hurt exactly the same either way, but intent is _completely_ relevant as to the type of upset I have with you, how much trust I offer you in the future, whether you get more chances, all the important things.

    Intent is far more important than whatever happened because intent decides whether we can have a relationship in the future, whereas whatever trivial day to day thing that happened... That's already past and mostly meaningless.  Only the intent and the nature of the future relationship have any bearing or interest.


    not true because even if you dont intend to, if you keep tripping and stabbing me, I wont trust you when you are near. 

    As far as the annoucement and the 80 gems: im not really impressed. 

    As far as the reasoning: that a card is an auto include shows it's flexibility not the over poweredness of a card.

    it would be like nerfing drownyard temple of that shrine or even some of the basic lands.


    anyway....
  • span_argoman
    span_argoman Posts: 751 Critical Contributor
    @andrewvanmarle A card which is an auto-include shows its flexibility and not that it's overpowered?

    Even in the best case scenario, an auto-include means that actual deckbuilding option for building a competitive deck takes a hit cause you always need to have that card in the deck.

    Just like Corrupted Grafstone or Shrine of the Forsaken Gods, and Tamiyo's Journal back in the days of SOI.

    It's an auto-include because it is a superior option to other cards which would serve the same function. That makes it overpowered in its category.