Dunkelgrau wrote: For disclosure, I have poorly covered Punisher, Mags Classic, and singleton Daredevil and Psylocke. This time around, I'm leading any sub event I please, and getting to see everything, and I STILL maintain that it's stupid, stupid, stupid.
Skyedyne wrote: mechgouki wrote: Anyone else thinks it is **** to force Daredevil to fight in a minions only match? Yeah, I thought that this was slightly dumb as well. Way to pick the fights DD! They can't fight back!
mechgouki wrote: Anyone else thinks it is **** to force Daredevil to fight in a minions only match?
Dunkelgrau wrote: Locking content behind specific covers is just poor design. It's a poor way to segregate the playerbase, AND it's a bad way to operate F2P, because *it is not F2P!* Locking content behind a required character, when you do not have that character, is Pay to Play, which (I hope people can appreciate) is not F2P. People with the appropriate covers (either by purchasing a 10x pack, or winning a tourney), should have a sizeable advantage - and they do! The req'ed covers not only provide another juicy source of points, but they're also BOOSTED! No reason to lock out other players from enjoying the content that the devs worked so hard to produce. Content walls are simply bottom-barrel design. For disclosure, I have poorly covered Punisher, Mags Classic, and singleton Daredevil and Psylocke. This time around, I'm leading any sub event I please, and getting to see everything, and I STILL maintain that it's stupid, stupid, stupid.