entrailbucket said:If you want to look (caution, my 4* roster is EXTREMELY DUMB) I'm in the alliance Clochards. It got this way from playing at a high level for a very long time and only opening classics.
TheEyeDoctorsWife said: I don’t farm nor roster anything irrelevant to winning battles . I play solely to win battles if I wanted to farm I’d play FarmVille. Obviously I have tons of unused resources left over as well . Extrapolation of my current 4*s shows it would take me 6 years at least to max champ a 4. The time isn’t worth the effort nor rewards .
entrailbucket said: TheEyeDoctorsWife said: I don’t farm nor roster anything irrelevant to winning battles . I play solely to win battles if I wanted to farm I’d play FarmVille. Obviously I have tons of unused resources left over as well . Extrapolation of my current 4*s shows it would take me 6 years at least to max champ a 4. The time isn’t worth the effort nor rewards . The last time they did retroactive feeders, my absurd pile of duplicate 4* kicked out something like 80 5* covers, many of which are now highly relevant to winning battles. If they make Elektra a feeder today, I think I'd get about 50 5* covers from her alone (I don't know why I pull so many Elektras).
TheEyeDoctorsWife said: entrailbucket said: TheEyeDoctorsWife said: I don’t farm nor roster anything irrelevant to winning battles . I play solely to win battles if I wanted to farm I’d play FarmVille. Obviously I have tons of unused resources left over as well . Extrapolation of my current 4*s shows it would take me 6 years at least to max champ a 4. The time isn’t worth the effort nor rewards . The last time they did retroactive feeders, my absurd pile of duplicate 4* kicked out something like 80 5* covers, many of which are now highly relevant to winning battles. If they make Elektra a feeder today, I think I'd get about 50 5* covers from her alone (I don't know why I pull so many Elektras). Since I also win my battles without doing all that , I don’t see the relevancy of all the extra work or covers. Also after anniversary week playing with all metas boosted the game had neither challenge nor entertainment value . Playing at high battle speed is not my objective. My wins give the same results and rewards regardless .
ThaRoadWarrior said: TheEyeDoctorsWife said: entrailbucket said: TheEyeDoctorsWife said: I don’t farm nor roster anything irrelevant to winning battles . I play solely to win battles if I wanted to farm I’d play FarmVille. Obviously I have tons of unused resources left over as well . Extrapolation of my current 4*s shows it would take me 6 years at least to max champ a 4. The time isn’t worth the effort nor rewards . The last time they did retroactive feeders, my absurd pile of duplicate 4* kicked out something like 80 5* covers, many of which are now highly relevant to winning battles. If they make Elektra a feeder today, I think I'd get about 50 5* covers from her alone (I don't know why I pull so many Elektras). Since I also win my battles without doing all that , I don’t see the relevancy of all the extra work or covers. Also after anniversary week playing with all metas boosted the game had neither challenge nor entertainment value . Playing at high battle speed is not my objective. My wins give the same results and rewards regardless . We’ve had a few people on the forum extol the virtues of a small meta roster, but I can assure you that having a complete roster pays for itself in champion rewards and gives you access to all the nodes that are required for playing PVE, and there is no comparison between having a champ reward factory spitting out resources vs not having one actually. So you may be getting “the same rewards” from events (which seems unlikely if you are missing out on required character nodes?), but you are super losing out on the character payouts in a big way if you don’t have them rostered.