ValekBoss said: Just a short anwser to start the discussion.what is your current level & what teams do you see in PvP right now ? LVL119, only teams i see in pvp are dual champend 5* teams, does not matter what slice or what time i join.are those 15 CP (1200 points) so important for your progression ? important? No but very usefull and the only reason i have to get to 1200+ in PVP.The 15 cp + the 10cp form the 575 score gets you another pull form Latest Tokens, the only way to improve the 5* i have.Normally i would get to 1200+ within 1 hour / 1,5 hour play and just shield out. Now it is40 matches just for a 4* cover.....:S
D4Ni13 said: ValekBoss said: Just a short anwser to start the discussion.what is your current level & what teams do you see in PvP right now ? LVL119, only teams i see in pvp are dual champend 5* teams, does not matter what slice or what time i join.are those 15 CP (1200 points) so important for your progression ? important? No but very usefull and the only reason i have to get to 1200+ in PVP.The 15 cp + the 10cp form the 575 score gets you another pull form Latest Tokens, the only way to improve the 5* i have.Normally i would get to 1200+ within 1 hour / 1,5 hour play and just shield out. Now it is40 matches just for a 4* cover.....:S What is the level of your 5* compared to the other 4* ? I'm trying to see the difference in level here, so I would understand why don't you see other teams. The dual 5* teams you see have a big 4* with them, or an underleveled 5* ?
dr tinykittylove said: I have a very simple question. What is this mystical 5* land of which you speak that is totally different from every other land? Do 4* players not need cp to progress? Does my 3* roster alt think cp is a waste of time? Do new players working to finish their 3*s and roster their first 4*s not want cp? How would all these players respond, do you think, if tomorrow Brigby announces a new PVE test - you need 6 clears to reach max progression, which will be a 4* cover. The cp that used to be in final progression will be moved to top 20 placement.
D4Ni13 said: dr tinykittylove said: I have a very simple question. What is this mystical 5* land of which you speak that is totally different from every other land? Do 4* players not need cp to progress? Does my 3* roster alt think cp is a waste of time? Do new players working to finish their 3*s and roster their first 4*s not want cp? How would all these players respond, do you think, if tomorrow Brigby announces a new PVE test - you need 6 clears to reach max progression, which will be a 4* cover. The cp that used to be in final progression will be moved to top 20 placement. Who are you asking the question ? As a 4* player I agree with your point, but recent news showed that a lot of 5* players disagree. So I'm trying to understand why, and if there is something to do towards better overall experience. So far it seems that it is a big difference in what people see in PvP. While a 4* player sees a big variety of teams (including 3* & underleveled 5*), a 5* players sees only 5* champs. This certainly isn't the same thing. So having to play 40 games against 5* champs is like we have to play 40 games against the hardest teams we can encounter at our level. Not very motivating...
This is the point you are missing. This change will not hurt me at all, but I run an alliance of 40+ people. THAT'S the point that you are missing. This is not about me or my play style, it is about my ally mates, the people I work with on LINE and people that just don't have the time to fight for a top 10 spot to recover the missing 15 CPs. 1200 is a walk in the park in slice 1/3/4 for PVP. Any 4 * player, heck I have seen 3 * players get 1200, that is in those slices can make that happen. Yes LINE is very useful for this, but can be done without it to. I have seen in the past you have said "I don't want to use a 3rd party application" but I can tell you about 60% of the people I talk to or work with do not come to the forums any more since it is not useful and to be honest, the people that post the most are not even close to the same level as they are. LINE or Discord is so much better for the social aspect, helping rosters progress, learning the game in a different manner then what you can learn from here. Also, the 5* players have been 3* or 4* players as well. I remember taking down 4* HB at 270, yes before champing, with a 3* cyc when he was boosted. Man he was killer. This was before 5* were in the game so yes, a lot of us have been around a long time and have seen many changes. They removed the 25CPs from the 1300 then 1200 mark and spilt it to 575 and 1200 to make it easier for people to get. Now they are removing the 15 CP to progression. This is a huge blow that if you don't play PVP in a competitive level, then you just don't understand.
D4Ni13 said: What is wrong with the 5* Land (precise data, examples, use cases)Why do you think this happened (content or objective reason)What do you think can be done to solve the problem (or part of the problem)
D4Ni13 said: So a couple of honest questions, for a starting point: what is your current level & what teams do you see in PvP right now ? (does it change if you are lower or higher, or is it the same no matter what ?) are those 15 CP (1200 points) so important for your progression ? I'm asking about CP because there are multiple sources of CP in game, and as a 4* player, I never battled for that reward (stopped at 900 points), and despite this I manage to have a pretty good income of CP without buying my way there. So is this really a necessity for your progression, or it's just something you're used to and now you don't have it anymore & feel robbed ? (honest question).
OJSP said: Pants1000 said: On the original subject, I'll share my experience, although I know it's different from more advanced rosters.I have a champed Surfer, a 435 OML, and 10 level 300+ 4's. I do not see constant Panther/Thanos teams like some people report. I see a mix of champed 5's, near-champed 5's, max-champed/boosted 4's, lower champed/boosted 4's, and rarely unboosted 4's (like Carol/Medusa/Vulture). The 5's I see are varied. Lots of OML, Phoenix, Thanos, Panther, Surfer, and Hawkeye. The other 5's are less common.The easiest teams I see during my climb in Black Vortex are teams like 420 OML, 380 Jean, 380 Gamora. The hardest I see are 479 Rocket, 479 Gamora, 479 Carol.If I push hard early I stop seeing the easier opponents and see mostly 479 4's and champed 5's. About halfway through the event, if I push over 800 I "break MMR" and see easier teams. Some easier 4* teams usually worth 10-20 points, and even some 3* teams (seals) worth around 5 points. If I go for 40 wins, I think the best strategy for me will be to get to 800 with 15-20 wins, then rack up a bunch of wins on easy teams after breaking MMR. You are playing in slice 2, where the proportion of 5* players are relatively lower than other slices and also where some players prefer using their boosted 4*s than their 5*s.
Pants1000 said: On the original subject, I'll share my experience, although I know it's different from more advanced rosters.I have a champed Surfer, a 435 OML, and 10 level 300+ 4's. I do not see constant Panther/Thanos teams like some people report. I see a mix of champed 5's, near-champed 5's, max-champed/boosted 4's, lower champed/boosted 4's, and rarely unboosted 4's (like Carol/Medusa/Vulture). The 5's I see are varied. Lots of OML, Phoenix, Thanos, Panther, Surfer, and Hawkeye. The other 5's are less common.The easiest teams I see during my climb in Black Vortex are teams like 420 OML, 380 Jean, 380 Gamora. The hardest I see are 479 Rocket, 479 Gamora, 479 Carol.If I push hard early I stop seeing the easier opponents and see mostly 479 4's and champed 5's. About halfway through the event, if I push over 800 I "break MMR" and see easier teams. Some easier 4* teams usually worth 10-20 points, and even some 3* teams (seals) worth around 5 points. If I go for 40 wins, I think the best strategy for me will be to get to 800 with 15-20 wins, then rack up a bunch of wins on easy teams after breaking MMR.