Skygazing wrote: Starlord is another one that ranks a bit too high IMO, but admittedly my 5/5/3 has been unchamped for a long time so I may be biased. His Yellow is better now, but not so much that it can carry his unboosted Red and Purple's numbers which still fall a bit short. He's another character that also performs way better in PvE than he does in PvP. On the subject of reworks, Cho should definitely be higher and arguably ahead of Starlord. His Green is expensive, but the modality of it combined with targeted tile destruction is very helpful. His Blue is light on AP generation but almost 2k damage unboosted is nothing to complain about, and his Black isn't a great heal but I've used it a ton just for the Charged tiles which end being very useful.
Fightmastermpq wrote: Leugenesmiff wrote: Is Charlie's Angels the same thing as Winfinite? If not, never mind, if so then I'd have to disagree with the "it sucks and is boring" comment. For me it's one of the most fun teams to play. Playing around making match 5s kind of switches up the entire general gameplay style you get with most teams and makes the team feel unique and different. I wish more character combinations had this kind of chemistry. The way it makes you change how you play is refreshing in a match 3 game and for me adds a lot of fun. Yes they are the same. It doesn't suck, but it is slow which makes it bad for competitive PvE, and weak on defense which makes it bad for competitive PvP. I do think that ProfX is still underrated on this list though. I've also started using 5* BW with ProfX and IF for a near-winfinite combo that is considerably faster than Charlie's Angels.
Leugenesmiff wrote: Is Charlie's Angels the same thing as Winfinite? If not, never mind, if so then I'd have to disagree with the "it sucks and is boring" comment. For me it's one of the most fun teams to play. Playing around making match 5s kind of switches up the entire general gameplay style you get with most teams and makes the team feel unique and different. I wish more character combinations had this kind of chemistry. The way it makes you change how you play is refreshing in a match 3 game and for me adds a lot of fun.
El Satanno wrote: If you think Peggy isn't better than Iceman I'd like to get some of what you're smoking, please. Nice write-up, though! I applaud your formatting and attention to detail.
Wobby wrote: Re: Peggy vs. Iceman, Peggy I am comfortable rolling with on my PVP team alongside OML, even unboosted. No other 4* gets that treatment. In the 4* vacuum Iceman is probably the best for certain, but Peggy is the #1 character for me.
fnedude wrote: So where does Howard and DevilDino fall on the list to you? I'm curious to see how you rank them compared to others. Yes I know they are "specialty" characters
Jarvind wrote: On reviewing the comments and considering further, I made a few changes: - Ant-Man, Kingpin, and Carnage all had their rank increased within their tiers. - Drax's rank was lowered within his tier. - Sam Wilson was bumped out of the trash tier and into the middle of the B-list tier. His description was changed as well. - Changed description of Wasp's AP drain to be correct. - Sorry, Peggy lovers and Reed haters. Iceman is still #1 and Venom is still dead last. Some suggestions clearly indicated that the character description had not been read. Just sayin'.