Xaldyn wrote: Can someone please put up a poll asking whether d3 should remove Totally Awesome Hulk from all tokens (Heroic and Legendary ) until they update him? He's one of the few characters I seem to pull reliably, and despite needing all the 4*'s I can get, I've sold the cover because the 1k iso was far more useful to me than any color of Cho. In the most recent character ranking he beat out Devil Dino to claim the position of worst 4* in the game, and we only see DD in packs once a year! Personally, whenever I open a 4*, even if it's starlord or invisible women, I can live with it because at least in their boosted events, they can sort of pull their weight. But I get infuriated when I see Cho because to me, that's a completely wasted token. I know I'm not the only one who feels this way, and I'm asking if someone can put up the poll because I dont know how (or I don't have permission to do so) and I want to see what everyone thinks and, maybe, get d3 to respond to this.
ronin-san wrote: Amadeus ****: The Totally Awful Hulk is my $.02. In the Green Lantern movie, Greg Berlanti (writer) had this great idea for Hal and Carol's relationship; that her death, and tear from her face, hits the ring and reignites Hal's resolve, and re-powers the ring. This was the ooomph he needed to fight Sinestro. Because Sinestro, not giant space spaghetti monster, was his villain. Nope. Board intervention meant they needed a "shock and awe" sort of baddie instead of truly good writing and proven character development. Ergo, the movie was wrestled from his hands, and his name is tarnished because of it. What's that got to do with Cho? This character design reeks of Top Brass intervention. You can really feel, when playing a character, when a hand was forced. Casey and Will can design great characters. Example: Iron Fist. This was not one of them.
Vhailorx wrote: ronin-san wrote: Amadeus ****: The Totally Awful Hulk is my $.02. In the Green Lantern movie, Greg Berlanti (writer) had this great idea for Hal and Carol's relationship; that her death, and tear from her face, hits the ring and reignites Hal's resolve, and re-powers the ring. This was the ooomph he needed to fight Sinestro. Because Sinestro, not giant space spaghetti monster, was his villain. Nope. Board intervention meant they needed a "shock and awe" sort of baddie instead of truly good writing and proven character development. Ergo, the movie was wrestled from his hands, and his name is tarnished because of it. What's that got to do with Cho? This character design reeks of Top Brass intervention. You can really feel, when playing a character, when a hand was forced. Casey and Will can design great characters. Example: Iron Fist. This was not one of them. You're suggesting that marvel forced demiurge to design a bad character because . . . reasons? Is chi a big enough character that marvel really wants to push him? Also, just because demiurge can design good characters doesn't mean that they CAN'T design bad ones. There are about 100 characters in the game in total and not all of them are great, or even good. Is marvel responsible for all of the bad ones?!
mckauhu wrote: At max level he does roughly 10k damage with his green when having 30 blue ap... Geez, when you gonna even save 30 blue ap?? And his hot dog stand unless you eliminate blues, is totally useless. Only way I see this character have some value is destroying troublesome tiles with mastermind excello but even for that he needs 12 green! Well there could be some synergy with Hood collecting green and his black reducing timer on his blue, but still pretty much useless...
an1979 wrote: For the first time in a looong time I pulled 4* from Heroics token... And what I got? Garbage Hulk's Hot Dog Stand Now at 3/0/3 Six, SIX! 4* WASTED on this TinYkiTTy