stephen43084 wrote: Really? They actually do something positive and great, and you choose to write this?
rowaasr13 wrote: stephen43084 wrote: Really? They actually do something positive and great, and you choose to write this? Uh, wait, not doing something **** after negative feedback is now all it takes to "do something positive and great"? Is your expectation for them THAT LOW so you ready to praise even simply not doing bad things? Because if you didn't notice, what they did do is: DID NOTHING.
LakeStone wrote: We are already in the process of hiring a Community Manager. Of course, finding the right person will take some time. This may not solve all the problems, but adding a community representative whose job is centered on bringing information out on time, gathering feedback and making sure that the fanbase's voice is heard, will ultimately have a positive impact.
Cryptobrancus wrote: So re-establishing lines of communication, giving us a heads up on what next steps are, holding back on a change based on community feedback, and hiring a community manager is nothing? If the cynics are right, 'nothing' would look like complete silence, and changes going through permanently with no warning despite any level of negative feedback. D3 seems to be working on their PR presence, why choose that to complain about?
Malcoran wrote: It doesnt matter what theyre saying, you cant trust them at all. And from same reasons Im not so sure they made decision about holding Daken nerf cause community feedback. Hiring a community manager? Where is this guy, tell me.
Thugpatrol wrote: Skepticism is warranted. Trust is earned, and when it's been this badly broken it's a long and difficult process to repair it. On the other hand when someone says, "We did some things wrong, we're going to try and do better," and your response is, "Yeah? Well tinykitty you!" that's counterproductive. Change takes time, so put the torches and pitchforks on standby and let's see what happens next. It's easy enough to start burning and pillaging again if they mess this up too.
Malcoran wrote: Youve absolutely right mate, all I wanted is to say that you cant blame people for complaining cause they have valid arguments. Its not **** or whining and Im just feeling like some peoples are forcing others to thinking their way.
Malcoran wrote: Cryptobrancus wrote: So re-establishing lines of communication, giving us a heads up on what next steps are, holding back on a change based on community feedback, and hiring a community manager is nothing? If the cynics are right, 'nothing' would look like complete silence, and changes going through permanently with no warning despite any level of negative feedback. D3 seems to be working on their PR presence, why choose that to complain about? There was any communication here? Im playing 4 months and only saw IceX, who wasnt best connection anyway (lies about golden characters, mistakes about healing in prologue and mmr). Next steps...Im hearing about some nerfs etc since when I start reading this forum and nothing changed. So it doesnt matter what theyre saying, you cant trust them at all. And from same reasons Im not so sure they made decision about holding Daken nerf cause community feedback. Hiring a community manager? Where is this guy, tell me. Maybe they finally noticed lowering popularity, maybe someone really start using brain and maybe we will have positive changes. But in same way you want to stay positive some people have right to complain imo. Cause there are enough valid arguments to do this.
DrUnpleasant wrote: I know I **** a lot about certain things (*waves at event finish times for Europe*) but actually the level of dev/publisher interaction on here is far higher than I've seen in some other mobile games. Proof is in the pudding and all that, but the Daken postponement is a decent gesture.