Shikao wrote: I must say that situation in our bracket today is very stable The Ladder wrote: Looks like I'll be ducking out of work at every opportunity tomorrow to stay top 3. Did you got bored at work? Or farmed just in case?
The Ladder wrote: Looks like I'll be ducking out of work at every opportunity tomorrow to stay top 3.
The Ladder wrote: Shikao wrote: I must say that situation in our bracket today is very stable The Ladder wrote: Looks like I'll be ducking out of work at every opportunity tomorrow to stay top 3. Did you got bored at work? Or farmed just in case? Farmed just in case. There was no way I was going to waste all that effort yesterday by being careless today.
Ranzera wrote: Yeah, 3 repeatables is too much on this system. I'm feeling kinda burned out myself.
Shikao wrote: The Ladder wrote: Farmed just in case. There was no way I was going to waste all that effort yesterday by being careless today. I might have done that...
The Ladder wrote: Farmed just in case. There was no way I was going to waste all that effort yesterday by being careless today.
Bainee wrote: I would love face off against a lvl 200 Rag, 150 Daken and 150 Bullseye. But they should reward 120-150 points a pop.
The Ladder wrote: Bainee wrote: I would love face off against a lvl 200 Rag, 150 Daken and 150 Bullseye. But they should reward 120-150 points a pop. Which would gift each bracket to those strong enough to take on that level of opponent. And leave the everyman moaning about how unfair it is that those big guns win the tournaments
Bainee wrote: You could take away the limits on the repeatables, just have a wide range worth appropriate points based on difficulty. This would balance a strong deck against an abundance of time, which the current format favors.
Misguided wrote: Bainee wrote: You could take away the limits on the repeatables, just have a wide range worth appropriate points based on difficulty. This would balance a strong deck against an abundance of time, which the current format favors. And if someone has a strong deck AND an abundance of time? I like the diminishing returns, personally, and think your idea of having missions of multiple difficulties that share stacks is awesome. More challenging grinding sounds better than more time grinding.
sps-puzzlequest wrote: I'm always wary when giving estimates of other people's work. We don't know how it's implemented and this seemingly simple change might be quite the contrary.