Tanglefoot said: saw this "When you skip a node, the game looks for your next fight by applying filters in cascading order.1. Unshielded players2. A filter here removes fights that are deemed too hard for you to win.3. Players with similar points to you in this event.4. Players with a similar roster to you (note that this has nothing to do with the team you're currently using, it's your roster)."the only thing true here is #1.2 - I am a mid-3* player, with only 1 character over level 200. I regularly get fights offered to me where the LOWEST level on the enemy team is 300+, and they have 2 5* each with multiple covers. The chances I can win a battle against a level 300 5* Carnage with all colors, a level 327 kitty with all colors, and a level 355 Apocalypse with all colors is exactly 0%. so not true.3. I regularly see enemies that I cannot find on the list of scores, at all. Perhaps, as someone mentions above, they are getting similar scores in other slices and I just cannot see them. I was watching this last night. I was #3 in a PvP, and like 150 points ahead of #4. Both #1 and #2 in rankings were unshielded, and neither ever appeared in my PvP in 15 battles, as I caught up to and passed them. By the time I finished, #4 was about 200 points behind the new #3, but I never saw the other two players I passed, but I skipped a TON of other enemies with monster teams. I am not convinced your score has ANYTHING to do with PvP matching.4. Absolutely not true. I have skipped 12-15 opponents before seeing another 3* character, The total levels of my entire team cannot exceed 600 - I just don't have the roster. I rarely see enemy teams where the total levels of the enemy team are lower than maybe 1,000 at best, and often see levels totaling over 1100. That regularly pits me against players with fully champed 4* rosters, when I don't even have a single maxed 3*. so the roster has nothing to do with MMR.MMR is a mystery.
LavaManLee said: Beefhammer69 said: Also, you keep mentioning that you play CL10 PVP in like every post/comment but that still doesn’t change the fact that it has no effect on the teams the game shows you. That’s based on your MMR and your MMR only. Is this a documented fact? And very sorry to upset you by mentioning it as I thought it was worthwhile. There are many people (like my alliance mates) that I never, ever ever see so thought it has something to do with my slice and my CL10. I could definitely be incorrect and thought mentioning what Level I play was helpful. But it might have no bearing.
Beefhammer69 said: Also, you keep mentioning that you play CL10 PVP in like every post/comment but that still doesn’t change the fact that it has no effect on the teams the game shows you. That’s based on your MMR and your MMR only.
Sekilicious said: I just realized that 5* players call me a walrus behind my back. Time to go on a diet and get braces I guess
Tanglefoot said: #5 in my slice with 628 points. Stalled because there are no enemy teams available that I even have a chance of beating. For grins I checked the rosters of everyone in the top 10 on the leaderboard. 8 of the other 9 in the top 10 have a weaker roster than me but none of them appeared in my enemy options. I can get into the low 700s but have no chance of staying anywhere near that since if I get there I get pounded by level 450 teams and shed 150 points in a couple minutes - like the MMR said “hey here is someone scoring too high”I am unconvinced the MMR has anything to do with scores. It has previously been suggested that I am breaking MMR. perhaps then, the proposed rules apply in normal MMR and there are simply no rules when you break MMR. It seems I tend to live in a broken MMR world.
Sekilicious said: The ones who score higher than you with lesser rosters likely all shield hop and coordinate their hops on line. So you’re correct. Your final score has little to do with MMR.
Tanglefoot said: BriMan, none were shielded.I think my point is that MMR in PvP has rules, but it is possible to put yourself in a position where you break MMR and the rules no longer apply correctly. I tend to consume my ammo and climb into the 600-700 range 2x during a PvP, then try to make a run late to get maybe top 10, depending on the rewards. I have hit #3, and usually hit top 10 when I try, but not always - that pounding in the last 3 minutes of a PvP often costs me big, but it’s not often I feel the rewards I can reach are worth the cost of a shield.as a mostly 3* player, though I have both Polaris and R4G rostered, chances I could hit 800 points is pretty close to 0%. Maybe if I shield hopped, but if I spend the HP for shields I will still need to see winnable matches when I unshield. Once I get much over about 600 points I have to shop hard for a potentially winnable match - skipping most opponents who hit me, and using up all my other skips. I typically then buy 3 skips at 10 iso each. If I still don’t get a decent match, I exit the PvP and wait for someone to attack me again and try skipping again. I have “skipped” as many as 15 opponents before finding a reasonable match. Skipping is its own problem - still surprised I can “skip” 3 times and keep getting the same exact opponent tossed back at me.I regularly try matches against multiple 5* covers, but at my level, when it seems like every enemy team includes something like a lvl 340 full color Kitty, a lvl 320 Killmonger with multiple red and black covers or a level 357 full color 5* Deadpool, my “winnable” options are often limited.