Vhailorx said: coming late to this thread, so apologies if the answer to my question is dicussed already.Is the reference to Shardmas 2.0 meant to be hopeful, or insulting? I mean, everyone remembers that the shardmas 1.0 was an absolute clustertinykitty, right?
BriMan2222 said: Vhailorx said: coming late to this thread, so apologies if the answer to my question is dicussed already.Is the reference to Shardmas 2.0 meant to be hopeful, or insulting? I mean, everyone remembers that the shardmas 1.0 was an absolute clustertinykitty, right? Yes, but after the huge backlash they received that made them do it right eventually, surely they wouldn't make that mistake again and would just give us all the proper rewards to begin with right? Right??? Right?!?!?!
Vhailorx said: BriMan2222 said: Vhailorx said: coming late to this thread, so apologies if the answer to my question is dicussed already.Is the reference to Shardmas 2.0 meant to be hopeful, or insulting? I mean, everyone remembers that the shardmas 1.0 was an absolute clustertinykitty, right? Yes, but after the huge backlash they received that made them do it right eventually, surely they wouldn't make that mistake again and would just give us all the proper rewards to begin with right? Right??? Right?!?!?! presumably, their solution will be to stash all the new champ rewards in new 4* releases, so very very few players will have the new feeders above 300 and demi/d3 won't get yelled at by their monetization divisions for giving away so many 5* covers to vets.
OJSP said: DAZ0273 said: Well there are enough 3* characters who only single feed to have a second comfortably feed all the 4* needed to cover the 5* currently unfed. And there are plenty of combinations available from those available. So that would be a bit of a flimsy excuse. Again, your assumption is they are happy giving out the retroactive rewards in the first place. What you’re suggesting will give out a lot of rewards because some players have multiple 3*s and 4*s. Personally, I think they were always reluctant to do so, but they were stuck because of precedence. Last year, during the first round of the update, I think they were testing the waters and seeing what would happen if they gave out less than what playerd were expecting.I always thought when I read that comment (it was said on Discord), it meant that they were trying to avoid updating older 4*s. But, eventually more characters were released and they still didn’t have any obvious 5*s they could feed, so they had to everything at the same time. People were wondering why America Chavez would give out JJ (when Luke Cage would be more sensible) and why Teen Jean Grey doesn’t give out Phoenix. I think they were done that way because they didn’t want to give out too many covers. I think more people had more levels of Luke Cage and Teen Jean as they are older than America Chavez and Jubilee.add: don’t get me wrong. I’m happy too if they decide to update older 4*s and give out retroactive rewards like last year. But, I won’t be upset if they decide to do something different this year.
DAZ0273 said: Well there are enough 3* characters who only single feed to have a second comfortably feed all the 4* needed to cover the 5* currently unfed. And there are plenty of combinations available from those available. So that would be a bit of a flimsy excuse.
Mrcl25 said: So now they decide that only new 4*s will be feeders so no one will gets retroactive rewards? D3 never fails to disappoint us... I hope the player base reacts like last year, so they change this.