Gambit sell back price: Looking at the true value
The rockett
Posts: 2,016 Chairperson of the Boards
I have seen some ally mates, friends and some I don’t get along with sell their Gambits. Mine is 494 and I can get 57 tokens for him. This is a 1:1 deal. Some like this because you can get other 5*. Some still compare this to the OML nerf sell back at 2:1. Have seen many sell and pull good or bad for this. I am in the Camp, even though I did write up and share my experience with Gambit on the node of all nodes in PVE he was built for, Royal Family/InHumans, that I do not want to sell him. I spent a lot of money, time and energy to get mine as high as I could within my monetary budget and with what in game resource I had.
57 tokens over 24 5*. This would equal 2.3 covers for my current 5*. This to me does not seem like a fair trade. Let’s look at the numbers more.
I think it would be safe to say that at minimum 95% of all Gambit covers that were pulled were when he was in the Latest. While he was in the latest, there was only 2 other 5* in this group. They would have been in order.
Peter Parker
Daredevil
Gambit
Thor
Archangel
So explain to me why is it that with this sell back it is with 24-5*. If a safe number of 95% were pulled while he was in Latest with only 2 other 5*, why do we have to see an increase of 700% dilution? You go from pulling from a pool of 3-5* to a pool of 24-5*.
So they can make a character that is so OP during a time of year that has a massive sale, people spend their hard earned money on him, then they nerf him and give us a 700% increase on dilution. How is that a fair trade value? Why don’t these tokens only have 3-5* in them since that is how almost all player built him?
So he gets nerfed after the money train runs dry and then give us a massive dilution pool to pull from on how nobody would have built him.
57 tokens over 24 5*. This would equal 2.3 covers for my current 5*. This to me does not seem like a fair trade. Let’s look at the numbers more.
I think it would be safe to say that at minimum 95% of all Gambit covers that were pulled were when he was in the Latest. While he was in the latest, there was only 2 other 5* in this group. They would have been in order.
Peter Parker
Daredevil
Gambit
Thor
Archangel
So explain to me why is it that with this sell back it is with 24-5*. If a safe number of 95% were pulled while he was in Latest with only 2 other 5*, why do we have to see an increase of 700% dilution? You go from pulling from a pool of 3-5* to a pool of 24-5*.
So they can make a character that is so OP during a time of year that has a massive sale, people spend their hard earned money on him, then they nerf him and give us a 700% increase on dilution. How is that a fair trade value? Why don’t these tokens only have 3-5* in them since that is how almost all player built him?
So he gets nerfed after the money train runs dry and then give us a massive dilution pool to pull from on how nobody would have built him.
2
Comments
-
Welcome to every F2P game, ever.
You never get back what you invested - characters get either nerfed or left behind by power creep.
It's the business model - you pay to have a temporary advantage, then you need to spend again, to keep that advantage.
The only bad thing is that Gambit was allowed to run rampage for 9 months.9 -
Bowgentle said:Welcome to every F2P game, ever.
You never get back what you invested - characters get either nerfed or left behind by power creep.
It's the business model - you pay to have a temporary advantage, then you need to spend again, to keep that advantage.
The only bad thing is that Gambit was allowed to run rampage for 9 months.4 -
I got my champ Gambit 2 weeks before Parker left LL. I was in 4* land. He was my first champ. I am currently on day 1543. Until then, I played SCL 9 in PVE up to the 10 CP and I was happy with that. After getting Gambit, I've reached max progression in PVE in every event. I now have 4 5* Champs (PP, AA, DD, BB). I have several more 5*s at 10-12 covers. I am firmly situated in the 5* game. And I owe all that to having Gambit while he existed in all his glory. Upon his nerf, he was lvl 464. I sold him day 1, no hesitation, no regrets. I am thankful for all he accomplished for my roster, as he made so much of my progress over the last 9 months possible. That definitely has some added value. Maybe I'm not overly deflated by his nerf because I didn't spend extra money on him, just hoarded at a lucky time. Don't get me wrong, I loved me some Gambit, but I'm glad he's been nerfed. There's a lot more variety in PVP, and that, IMO, has a lot of extra value as well.4
-
Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.4
-
Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.0
-
Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.
Doesn't work that way.13 -
Bowgentle said:Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.
Doesn't work that way.0 -
The rockett said:Bowgentle said:Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.
Doesn't work that way.
Second, why should the buy-back be the same as the original acquisition? You're questioning the fact that they're different, as if it's obvious they should be the same, but you haven't backed that up. You say the point is simple, but being able to buy something and sell it back for the same value nine months later just... isn't a thing that happens. Why should this be different when that's literally not how buybacks work anywhere else in society?
4 -
I agree that it seems unfair from a certain point of view. They only have done a limited number of these buybacks, obviously, and OML's had the 2:1 exchange rate with a lot less 5's in there. So one could argue that the buyback now is somewhat equivalent in terms of offering a similar actual gain in any specific character, with dilution spreading your covers out more now than when OML was nerfed. But man, it hurts to consider tossing a well developed characters for the cover spread you'll likely end up with.
It seems very unlikely that anything will change, a week later, for the offer, store, buyback rate, or anything else. But it would have been nice if they had made it different, or offered Bonus Heroes, or something. Dilution is the biggest problem the game has remaining, and solutions seem few and far between.
Devil's advocate: When you pulled Gambit, you absolutely could not have exchanged him for any other character (unless you 550'd him). The same goes for Wasp, who is far worse and less desireable than post-nerf Gambit, and who most players would gladly exchange for another Okoye cover, or even Beardcap. So to suggest that the devs should offer a limited store? I dunno.
And, while the dilution is awful, some players will be excited to have the chance to pull a character in there, small as it may be. Creating a limited store with 3-5 (or whatever) 5's would make some people upset at not being able to try to pull the character(s) they really want.
PS: Note that they did at least leave out Doc Ock, who no one seems upset about (that I've seen) at being unable to try to convert their Gambit covers into.
Lastly, my personal RNG luck was such that I never finished Gambit (4/5/3) but pulled enough Thors to get him to 458, my highest 5. So in a sense, I got Thors over Gambits (and a few other people) which actually left me in a pretty good spot, post Nerfbit. Just to point out that every player's experience can vary quite a bit.1 -
The rockett said:That is what they are making us do. The point is simple. You got this character covered and champ levels in Latest with only 3-5* in that group. The buy back is in 24-5*. Why? Why shouldn’t it be who is in the latests now? Why can’t this be a 3-5* vault because that’s how you got him?3
-
Sim Mayor said:The rockett said:That is what they are making us do. The point is simple. You got this character covered and champ levels in Latest with only 3-5* in that group. The buy back is in 24-5*. Why? Why shouldn’t it be who is in the latests now? Why can’t this be a 3-5* vault because that’s how you got him?0
-
@spidyjedi84 can you explain why you marked this as spam? It is numbers and laying this out.0
-
JHawkInc said:The rockett said:Bowgentle said:Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.
Doesn't work that way.
Second, why should the buy-back be the same as the original acquisition? You're questioning the fact that they're different, as if it's obvious they should be the same, but you haven't backed that up. You say the point is simple, but being able to buy something and sell it back for the same value nine months later just... isn't a thing that happens. Why should this be different when that's literally not how buybacks work anywhere else in society?
Lemon laws protect consumers. There are other consumer laws that do protect you for this. Yes I know what this sounds like, but I just wanted to lay this out by the numbers. I still think this is a terrible ratio for a buy back program.1 -
If he comes in as essential before his sell-back window is closed, then I will likely sell mine right after. A chance for Okoye covers and very little in the pool can hurt my roster makes it a strong consideration. And then Gambit not being essential again for who knows how long means I likely won't notice the lack.
If the window closes first, then I'll just keep 'im. He's certainly not a drag on my game, he's just not the go-to he was.1 -
The people who went all in on digital day and anyone else who has a 550 of any non latest character and sells Gambit and gets a bunch of those unusable fives just has to sell them for iso. CS won’t do non latest swaps even in this instance. Makes selling him even less palatable even though he is a fairly useless character now.0
-
If you don't like it, don't sell him.Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.Bowgentle said:Daiches said:Straycat said:Gambit was the number 1 draft pick that panned out and won you a bunch of titles. Now, past his prime but still good, you expect to trade him for another number 1 draft pick?How big of a hoard would be needed to guarantee 57 5*s? He's in classics now, so lets just say his trade in value matches his current pull value.
Doesn't work that way.2 -
It's actually a great buy-back ratio because they're not making you return all the rewards you won using Gambit in the months that he was OP.
If you want to choose the characters you apply levels to, then fine, return the iso/HP/covers/tokens/CP you won with him.5 -
scottee said:It's actually a great buy-back ratio because they're not making you return all the rewards you won using Gambit in the months that he was OP.
If you want to choose the characters you apply levels to, then fine, return the iso/HP/covers/tokens/CP you won with him.
2 -
The rockett said:scottee said:It's actually a great buy-back ratio because they're not making you return all the rewards you won using Gambit in the months that he was OP.
If you want to choose the characters you apply levels to, then fine, return the iso/HP/covers/tokens/CP you won with him.
Which just brings us full circle, in that dominating with Gambit for months on-end is part of the value, and unless you plan on giving that up (any placement rewards gained due to easier/faster clears), then you shouldn't be expecting such high returns for selling the character.2 -
So, just to clarify;
You have been around long enough to see strong, ubiquitous characters nerfed over the years, some with little to no compensation.
You were also around to witness the buy back rate for OML, who had a similar store, and similar arguments were made about the value of the store.
Then, when you saw a strong character coming inbound, with all that previous knowledge, decide to work, play and spend hard to get him to a level that 99% of the playerbase cannot even fathom.
You then precede to take advantage of this great and all powerful character to maintain your position through more and more rewards, both from the champ levels of said character as well as the placement rewards, for months on end.
And when the character was finally nerfed, and compensation is offered, not only do you disregard past knowledge of previous offerings, you post about it, and argue against the logic put forward by other users.
Is that a good recap, or did i leave anything out, like maybe calling out the the guy who marked your post as spam, instead of just sending him a PM?11
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 504 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements