Invisible character stunned, then damaged with matches, while still invis. [solved]

I know the title sounds weird, but here's the situation.
I was using Howard and two others (inconsequential, because they were dead at this point), against Peggy and Elektra (3rd was dead).
Howard had 5 Duck Duck Loose invis tiles out. Peggy fired off Do as Peggy Says. Howard got stunned, due to being the only target... I'm assuming it counts as a team attack for this purpose. Anyways, after that, all matches by the enemy caused damage to Howard, despite still having plenty of invis tiles out. Sure, he was stunned, but he was invisible too.
Theoretically, at the most, I should only lose the turns, but still be protected by the invis effect until those tiles are gone.
I was using Howard and two others (inconsequential, because they were dead at this point), against Peggy and Elektra (3rd was dead).
Howard had 5 Duck Duck Loose invis tiles out. Peggy fired off Do as Peggy Says. Howard got stunned, due to being the only target... I'm assuming it counts as a team attack for this purpose. Anyways, after that, all matches by the enemy caused damage to Howard, despite still having plenty of invis tiles out. Sure, he was stunned, but he was invisible too.
Theoretically, at the most, I should only lose the turns, but still be protected by the invis effect until those tiles are gone.
0
Comments
...personally, I think its a little silly. It seems like the sort of thing where both effects could coexist without any issue.
That said, how well the effects could coexist depends on the code base. Stuns were the only one of those effects that was in the game when it debuted, and depending on how the others were added later, there may well be some kind of conflict.
This has other surprising interactions -- you can use invisibility to wake up a stunned character, for example.
However, per this thread (and some older ones about how her blue is meant to work), Peggy shouldn't have stunned him in the first place. Devs are aware of this and working on a fix.
[Marking this as solved.]
Not to be that guy, but if one of the support staff where I work flagged an issue as solved just because they were working on it, they'd be subject to a stern talking to. At best it's "in progress".
Okay, it's the difference between Solved (diagnosed) and Resolved (fixed). The problem can and will recur, it's the consequence of an active known bug.
I see "Solved", I think fixed. My bad.