Pvp vs Pve
Comments
-
We used to do thst but with a rotating 2* cover as they are more common and keeping the 3*0
-
I would keep the 3 if I liked it, or if I had extra hp on hand, but otherwise just would rotate it out.0
-
Perhaps another way to look at this is that the developers saw PvP having fewer and fewer players and want to make a change that may entice newer players and 3*-4* transitioners into playing PvP for that guaranteed 4* cover that anyone can achieve with effort. Unfortunately this change will negatively impact many veteran PvP competitive and even casual players with a lot of lost CP but maybe this is driven by game metrics that we don't know as well? It is plausible and with most changes there are winners and losers. I imagine on the forums, most of us are veterans and will lose from this but perhaps the other 95% of players that don't have a voice on the forum were actually asking for something like this. Let's face it...we forum posters are the bourgeois of MPQ
Some of us are the proletariat and some are royalty as well!2 -
hopper1979 said:PVE and PVP are two very different systems and I am having a hard time seeing how they could make pve progress like they now do in pvp. So please elaborate with an example that is similar.
Next is it the change that bothers people or just the number of wins to get the rewards? I am one of those who play pvp as much as I can (always get the 10 cp, hit 900 when possible) but I am in the weird scaling zone at the moment so things have become very difficult in pvp (I have 1 maxed 5 star and all I see are 5 maxed teams after about 300 points.) I think the wins might improve this because now I do not have to worry about skipping people until I find somebody I can fight and get good points for. My concern right now is the number of wins seem very high to me but that is a tweaking issue and one I hope they address next season but I have no issue with the idea of win progression.0 -
Right...-1
-
OJSP said:It's okay. I'm interested to know the answer to that question too. Your question hopefully will be answered by others in general rather than by one specific person.
As I've stated before, it's about unity.
When PVE max clears were raised we were met with half the Forum saying, "Good, I already do this much".
And by combining a feature a lot of people like (wins PVP) with a bad feature (loss of top prog. CP) they've successfully divided us again.
Shame, really. Playing everyone against each other. Sorry to any 1,200ers who don't get 15 CP now.2 -
Alsmir said:I noticed that a lot of supporters of the old PvP systems are:
b) people who think, that it made them somehow more "skilled" than others
Everyone started PVP sucking at it, and it definitely wasn't the most intuitive game mode. Making it more intuitive by just knowing how wins you need to get, to get whatever rewards is a HUGE step for newer players. No one is complaining about that. However, there is no longer any strategy to that. It doesn't take much skill or knowledge of the game to keep pressing a skip button until you find a team you can easily smash, to get to whatever total. It took skill, strategy, and experience to really figure out what your roster is capable of in the old system. Finding your 'float' point, learning just how far you could actually go with 1 boosted 4, 2 boosted 4s, how long you can generally go unshielded based on what team you were using, how to still score 800+ with no boosted 4s for the week, how to score the most points and still keep them when you're running low on HP, how quickly you can climb to certain point totals....etc.
Yeah all of that? DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE.
Now you just mindlessly grind away at the easiest teams you can beat, until you get to whatever total. You tell me which requires more "skill".5 -
This is poignant-1
-
BoyWonder1914 said:Alsmir said:I noticed that a lot of supporters of the old PvP systems are:
b) people who think, that it made them somehow more "skilled" than others
Everyone started PVP sucking at it, and it definitely wasn't the most intuitive game mode. Making it more intuitive by just knowing how wins you need to get, to get whatever rewards is a HUGE step for newer players. No one is complaining about that. However, there is no longer any strategy to that. It doesn't take much skill or knowledge of the game to keep pressing a skip button until you find a team you can easily smash, to get to whatever total. It took skill, strategy, and experience to really figure out what your roster is capable of in the old system. Finding your 'float' point, learning just how far you could actually go with 1 boosted 4, 2 boosted 4s, how long you can generally go unshielded based on what team you were using, how to still score 800+ with no boosted 4s for the week, how to score the most points and still keep them when you're running low on HP, how quickly you can climb to certain point totals....etc.
Yeah all of that? DOESN'T MATTER ANYMORE.
Now you just mindlessly grind away at the easiest teams you can beat, until you get to whatever total. You tell me which requires more "skill".
Now I know this is a Sim example and not the Storm event (haven't entered that yet), but I am using way more combinations than I did under the old system. The gaming the game strategy is much less, but the in-game strategy is way higher.
I now see a team and ask, "what's the best team to counter it?" or "what's the weakest team I can use and still come out ahead for some weak retaliations" (for those who still want some good ole fashioned gaming the game).
Under the old system half the characters were obsolete because they weren't fast enough, scary enough, or were offense only. It is amazing to feel that so many more characters are open to me. All the in-game and match-up strategies that have opened up are way more appealing to me.
1 -
They were always available to you. Youre only now realizing it.1
-
I actually wrote a similar strategy for my alliance since the new pvp changes1
-
This general question, ‘PvE vs PvP’ is one that I think deserves a different point of view... What I mean is, as far as I can see, the majority of people are focusing on 2 issues - CP distribution and the number of matches that are being enforced on people - which may or may not be as the Developers have stated in their reasoning.
To me, there’s a much more significant issue which is in terms of gameplay. How is PvP different from PvE Simulator mode? Now, yes, there are differences such as nodes, specific opponents, rewards gained per node and so on. But in principle, by making this change to PvP, how is my gaming experience significantly different to PvE? If I am to prolong the life of a mobile game, new, innovate gaming modes are required, rather than less. I would rather see a third option of gameplay, like the old PvP, still used in some way. New characters alone will not keep the game going, nor will new players who have better experiences. Keeping players interested and motivated to play with new modes, new experiences, this is what should be going on.
I am not ignorant that PvP did not need changes, and that newer/less developed rosters were getting a hard time in PvP as it was. But ignoring all rewards, all bonuses, even all the extra time it may or may not take to play, I don’t want PvP to just be a restricted (based on the ‘flavour of the week’ boosts) set of PvE nodes from the Simulator. I’ll play it, I’ll earn the rewards (indeed, I played PvP a lot, I’ve crossed paths with many in this thread and the other main thread over the years), but it’ll get more and more boring without innovation brought to the table.3 -
corytutor said:They were always available to you. Youre only now realizing it.
0 -
You absolutely could if you knew how and took the time. I know a guy who was putting up 2k every event with nothing more than scarlet with and 3* deadpool and doing it consistently.
Ojsp post about it was pretty spot on.
1 -
I'll get taken to task for this, and I hope I don't come across as more abrasive than I mean to, but... here goes.
I dig the PVP changes. I like them a lot. I have played a substantially higher amount of PVP already in the season than I would normally have at this point, and I am still a fan. But at the same time, I have empathy for those that hate the change. To me, the mere thought of getting 1200 points in an event was a ludicrous fantasy. but I get that there were people who did, and I am legitimately sorry for the loss of access to the 15 CP reward. That sucks for you, and I understand. I wish they hadn't done away with it so there'd be a higher percentage of happy players.
But at the same time... that capital of empathy is being spent so quickly with the perpetual and repeated complaining the last few days. And by the same people, over and over.
For reference's sake, when I saw the new SHIELD training event and how it basically locked me right out of accomplishing ANYTHING in it, I made one topic basically saying "Aw nuts, this stinks", and that was it (I actually replied two or three times to clarify I had missed some info and MAYBE it wasn't as bas as I thought, but basically it was my venting that it was something stunk for me and that was it).
Now imagine if every time you came to this site there were 100+ notifications to old topics, and 2-3 new topics al still complaining about SHIELD training. And they were all, by-and-large, by the same 5-6 people or so. You'd think "Boy, those people should go find something better to do with their lives", right?
Well that's where I am at with all the "I'm done buying things!" and "What would you PVE players do?!" and "Who else is boycotting?" topics. Guys, we all get it. It sucks for you. We're all sorry, but it is what it is at this point. Either make do with it (make do? make due? Huh, I never typed that out before! I'm not sure which it is) or don't, but I'm quickly losing sympathy hearing about it.
Go read some comics. That'll cheer you up. I'm slowly rereading both The X-Tinction Agenda and Batgirl of Burnside. They're both way better than complaining online.3 -
Daredevil217 said:corytutor said:They were always available to you. Youre only now realizing it.
1 -
Milk Jugz said:Daredevil217 said:corytutor said:They were always available to you. Youre only now realizing it.
Under the old old system if those 4* rosters hit me I was losing progression points fast but in this new system if they hit me I still get to stay at the same place progression wise, unless I’m missing something.0 -
Daredevil217 said:Milk Jugz said:Daredevil217 said:corytutor said:They were always available to you. Youre only now realizing it.
Under the old old system if those 4* rosters hit me I was losing progression points fast but in this new system if they hit me I still get to stay at the same place progression wise, unless I’m missing something.0 -
You get to keep progression daredevil but not placement which is for cp0
-
How did you notice? What sample are you using?
There are definitely some people, who were not able to get 4* from progression reward pool - i am one of them.
Am i the fan of win-based progression? Yes. Do i like the idea of 16 wins for 10CP/40 wins for 4*? Damn no - wins required should be cut by 30-50% to make it at least comparable to PvE AND the previous PvP system....0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 300 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements