wolfger said: The moral of this story is: don't spend real money on a card, because they will make it OP so people want to buy it, then nerf it once it becomes a widespread problem.
Onion_lotion said: http://i.imgur.com/NyiE8WQ.jpg here is another endless loop the AI can do I use. Better nerf it too.
cmassive13 said: Onion_lotion said: http://i.imgur.com/NyiE8WQ.jpg here is another endless loop the AI can do I use. Better nerf it too. First forum post here we goThe combo you listed here is can go on for a while, sure. Three big factors make it much less problematic than Baral1) Baral is a one-card engine that loops almost every card in your deck. This combo requires drawing at least two or three different cards before you can combo off, so to speak2) The green deck relies on three non-premium mythics (plus one of the strongest rares in the game). The mythics in this deck make it much less frequent than a Baral deck, which only required $30(?) and a few 3-mana spells3) This combo typically takes more turns to really flow. Obviously the hydra combo runs on mana acceleration, so you won't be hardcasting any of your mythics. The baral combo would turn on as soon as he hit the board, and typically trigger a 10+ minute loop of spellsFor D3H, I think the biggest difference is (1) listed above. They have a history of banning one-card infinite combos (see Seasons Past, Harness the Storm)the baral adjustment was an improvement for everybody (I think, although I don't have the card). It's more versatile for those who use it, it can't loop almost infinitely so there's less grief from those who play against itThe card was unhealthy for the game, and if you so desperately want access to that just because you rented those specific pixels, then I don't know what else to say ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ PS, I've never spent money on this game for financial reasons, but baral is probably the 5th card I would have bought (Olivia, Ulrich, Gisela, Emrakul). Just putting that out there
Gunmix25 said: cmassive13 said: Onion_lotion said: http://i.imgur.com/NyiE8WQ.jpg here is another endless loop the AI can do I use. Better nerf it too. First forum post here we goThe combo you listed here is can go on for a while, sure. Three big factors make it much less problematic than Baral1) Baral is a one-card engine that loops almost every card in your deck. This combo requires drawing at least two or three different cards before you can combo off, so to speak2) The green deck relies on three non-premium mythics (plus one of the strongest rares in the game). The mythics in this deck make it much less frequent than a Baral deck, which only required $30(?) and a few 3-mana spells3) This combo typically takes more turns to really flow. Obviously the hydra combo runs on mana acceleration, so you won't be hardcasting any of your mythics. The baral combo would turn on as soon as he hit the board, and typically trigger a 10+ minute loop of spellsFor D3H, I think the biggest difference is (1) listed above. They have a history of banning one-card infinite combos (see Seasons Past, Harness the Storm)the baral adjustment was an improvement for everybody (I think, although I don't have the card). It's more versatile for those who use it, it can't loop almost infinitely so there's less grief from those who play against itThe card was unhealthy for the game, and if you so desperately want access to that just because you rented those specific pixels, then I don't know what else to say ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ PS, I've never spent money on this game for financial reasons, but baral is probably the 5th card I would have bought (Olivia, Ulrich, Gisela, Emrakul). Just putting that out there Dunno if that was Karma or what but I JUST played against a deck with that ulvenwald build... holy cow. Almost untouchable in its loop and speed to build. The deck I played against was the most aggressive I had... but lost partially because the gods saw it humorous to not let me draw any of my three creature removal cards. That said, I watched in awe of how nuts this build is. O.o
Matthew said: cmassive13 said: Onion_lotion said: http://i.imgur.com/NyiE8WQ.jpg here is another endless loop the AI can do I use. Better nerf it too. First forum post here we goThe combo you listed here is can go on for a while, sure. Three big factors make it much less problematic than Baral1) Baral is a one-card engine that loops almost every card in your deck. This combo requires drawing at least two or three different cards before you can combo off, so to speak2) The green deck relies on three non-premium mythics (plus one of the strongest rares in the game). The mythics in this deck make it much less frequent than a Baral deck, which only required $30(?) and a few 3-mana spells3) This combo typically takes more turns to really flow. Obviously the hydra combo runs on mana acceleration, so you won't be hardcasting any of your mythics. The baral combo would turn on as soon as he hit the board, and typically trigger a 10+ minute loop of spellsFor D3H, I think the biggest difference is (1) listed above. They have a history of banning one-card infinite combos (see Seasons Past, Harness the Storm)the baral adjustment was an improvement for everybody (I think, although I don't have the card). It's more versatile for those who use it, it can't loop almost infinitely so there's less grief from those who play against itThe card was unhealthy for the game, and if you so desperately want access to that just because you rented those specific pixels, then I don't know what else to say ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ PS, I've never spent money on this game for financial reasons, but baral is probably the 5th card I would have bought (Olivia, Ulrich, Gisela, Emrakul). Just putting that out there Heck of an introductory post! I was going to say pretty much exactly what you've already said here, but you beat me to it!I will say though that if you bought Baral and expected him to remain in that form forever, you are either ignorant, naive, selfish, or some combination of the three. A massive swathe of the player base has been poking the development team on a daily basis since this card was first revealed, because we knew how much it would warp the gameplay. Someone who has nearly 50 posts to the forums cannot have been blind to that fact. That indicates that a player is at least marginally engaged with the community. It would be different if they had no involvement in the various social focal points for this game.Additionally, I think it takes a definite lack of creativity to believe that the old version of Baral was 'better' than this new one. Relying on a single card to power your deck is narrow-minded. Every card in your deck should be useful as soon as you draw it. In decks built around the old Baral, you had to hope and pray that you could draw him out quickly enough.
morgue427 : i am sorry some of you feel cheated but i dont and if you ponder the combinations that are now possible you most likely wont either.
EDHdad said: Any company with as much business acumen as a hamster would simply allow a dissatisfied customer to exchange their Baral for a different card. Possibly limited to a card which had been offered for sale in the past. Don't like the new Baral? Fine. Here's your Olivia / Ulrich / Emrakul / Gisela or whatever.
Gunmix25 said: AD&D rpg returning to the original D&D title and ditched all the rules and recreated new ones.... refund? Exchange? Nope. WotC banning cards, refund? Exchange? Nope. Wizkids changed the stats on powerful rare Mage knight and Mech Warrior figures thus making the old ones illegal to play. Refund? Exchange? Nope.
EDHdad said: It doesn't have to be this way, gosh darn it. Every transaction in this game doesn't have to be some sort of Faustian bargain.
Rogan Josh said: Gunmix25 said: AD&D rpg returning to the original D&D title and ditched all the rules and recreated new ones.... refund? Exchange? Nope. WotC banning cards, refund? Exchange? Nope. Wizkids changed the stats on powerful rare Mage knight and Mech Warrior figures thus making the old ones illegal to play. Refund? Exchange? Nope. But you can still use all these previous products with friends. You have a choice in which rules you use.